Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • The CMA’s latest monitoring report on road fuel shows that prices at the pump have risen since late January, accompanied by above average margins and spreads.View the full article
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Black Horse Secured Loan / 2nd Mortgage arrears dispute FOS complaint


Baz1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

5 How are second charge loans approved by the first charge lender?

 

This is quite complex. Some lenders will put a ‘restriction’ on the title (i.e. property) at the Land Registry preventing the registration of subsequent charges without the lender’s consent. However because of administration difficulties many no longer do this. Instead, a ‘unilateral notice’ may be used to protect a second charge on the register even if there is a restriction.

 

Where a lender does not use a restriction there is no need for the second charge lender to obtain consent.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]61952[/ATTACH]

 

Here you go, this should answer your question and it would appear there is nothing to be concerned about :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks citizenB

 

Could you kindly advise where you found this information ? Tried to click on Attachment but will not allow me to look at.

 

Ok so original lender is Bank of Scotland (1st charge).

 

1st Secured Loan / 2nd Mortgage is BH (2nd charge).

 

2nd Secured Loan / Personal Loan is WFS (3rd charge) with restriction on LR.

 

Am I correct in saying that BOS entered the restriction and therefore no consent was required for WFS to enter their charge ?

 

Just trying to get my head round all this thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have added it for you in pdf format rather than a link.

SN04837 (1).pdf

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have added it for you in pdf format rather than a link.

 

Thanks citizenB

 

Very much appreciated and I will have a read.

 

So if original lender has entered a restriction, would the 2nd and 3rd charge need their consent ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I just wondered if anyone had any further comments to the above thanks.

 

Latest is that we are now being constantly chased by Skye regarding disputed arrears amount.

 

Skye Loans are still refusing to accept Account in Dispute letter and are adding fees every month.

They still cannot provide evidence of the original arrears amount.

 

They are now pressurising us on a daily basis with threatening letters

and constantly calling my OH mobile number in which we believe was given by BH.

 

She eventually answered it and had a conversation with an Arrears Officer at Skye

who was rather rude to say the least and had my OH in tears.

We are now extremely worried and concerned.

 

They said if arrears not paid then they would start court action

and asked if we had any equity in our property to sell our house to pay of disputed arrears amount of approx £2,600 !

 

My OH said that the balance keeps increasing even though she has been making regular monthly payments.

They also suggested that if amount is increased then it will be paid off by end of term of original loan.

 

They have now today sent another letter asking us to complete an expenditure statement,

to provide 3 months pay-slips and bank statements within 7 days.

They also say that they will continue to add default fees whilst the account still has arrears.

 

Now both of us are at our wits end what to do next especially as we are now being constantly harassed.

 

We are sure something does not sit right with this but don't know what to do next.

Do we need to complete what they have requested or agree to demands for bank statements ?

 

Do we need to send a SAR ?

 

We see that Skye are regulated by the FCA.

 

Any help would be very much appreciated thank-you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must stand up to them

 

Yes Sar

Yes get reclaiming

I think its time for a CCA too

Something smells here

 

Can we have the full history with dates please

 

Stay off that phone!!

Block them

If they could do any of what they say

They would do it

Not willy wave!!

 

Who's name is on the land registry now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks again dx

 

I will collate and respond in detail as soon as possible with dates etc.

 

I have attached edited BH agreement details.

 

Now Skye Loans Ltd on Land Registry.

 

Shall I draft up another account in dispute letter regarding the arrears and claim back charges ?

 

Cheers for looking

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not exceeded upload limit again have you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid tablet ...war.

 

SAR them yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Ford and now things have moved on.

 

Skye are pressurising us now regarding arrears.

 

Monthly payments due are being made but interest keeps increasing.

 

Not a nice outfit to deal with according to my OH.

 

Ignoring Account in Dispute Letters, requesting that we sell house / equity to pay arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged.

 

 

this whole debacle smells

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the address on their statements will do

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

reg'd office London 40 dukes place?

no not a dca

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after further discussions with my OH, it now transpires that Skye were quite threatening to her on the telephone last week.

 

She didn't want to tell me (as would have angered me) but they even suggested that we rented out one of our rooms to pay-off arrears. This was in addition to telling her to sell our property or they would issue court proceedings. She said she was in tears and very upset on the phone but they continued to ask her what she was going to do about it.

 

Anyway they have sent another letter received today demanding that we return the enclosed I & E sheet, 3 months payslips and 3 months bank statements within 7 days.

 

We are happy to send back I & E details but are we obliged to respond with other details requested ?

 

My OH has been making the regular monthly payments to Skye and any arrears with them have been cleared.

 

Now on reviewing previous written correspondences further to our Account in Dispute letter, Skye did not provide evidence regarding the arrears amount apart from stating the amount.

 

They actually say that it should be referred to BlackHorse as it is not their issue ?

Also they still keep adding default fees / charges and interest even though we requested not to do so.

 

As previously advised I have sent a SAR, especially requesting telephone conversation details

re the day concerned as my OH was advised that it was recorded.

 

Should I now send a Formal Complaint letter,

including the above mentioned incident and remind them that they are regulated by the FCA ?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Baz

Link to post
Share on other sites

pes i'd not send them anything.

 

 

what they sai on the phone is out of order

and they would never repeat in a letter.

 

 

somethings wrong with this loan

can you scan up all the paperwork again.

its gone since the crash[you might have to rename the file first]

as old filename wont be allowed to be uploaded again.

 

 

formal complaint yes.

how much of this arrears are fees?

how much is outstanding

 

 

trying to gather why they are simply threatening

and being forceful rather than taking things to court..me thinks they cant

hence why BH sold the loan

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A belated thanks dx had to pop out.

 

I will start drafting complaint letter and should I head it up as a formal complaint ?

 

Agreement all loaded now. One sheet no copy of Terms of Agreement mentioned overleaf.

 

Secured loan but apparently unregulated.

 

I am just going through BH statement of account that was recently sent by Skye but no breakdown of arrears. Do they need to still provide breakdown of arrears ?

 

Also checking fees / charges added.

 

I wondered this as BH had never previously put any pressure on us. There again monthly payments were being made but no proof of arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an afterthought

 

On checking letter details received from Skye,

I see that it states that this mortgage is being serviced by Capita Mortgage Services Ltd,

in which are authorised and regulated by FCA (306235).

 

Sorry for daft question but are Skye Loans Limited therefore registered / regulated ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...