Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay - buyer protection fails


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought an item on ebay, and it did not turn up.

 

I asked the seller to track it, and the seller got back to me to say that the item had been left with neighbours, but the courier was unable to state which neighbours.

 

None of the neighbours had it.

 

I therefore wanted a refund, and had to put in a buyer protection claim.

 

Ebay refused to refund me, as the item was delivered within the "allowable distance".

 

I was utterly gobsmacked, I have confirmation from the seller that the item was not delivered to me, and yet ebay say that because it was delivered somewhere close to my house I am not entitled to a refund?

 

The amount of money involved is small, too small even for the small claims court, but the implications are huge. This was a cheap item, but I have been relying on buyer protection when I buy expensive items. Ebay appear to have changed the rules, if the item came somewhere near your house, and the courier can prove that with GPS, you will not get a refund - even if the courier and the seller both state that the item was not delivered!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be signed for, to confirm it was delivered. No signature then no prove it was delivered., however it has been known for couriers to sign it!

Also the courier or postie should have left a note telling you the house no.it was left at.

And they should not do that unless specifically agreed they could do that.

Have you checked they do have a signature?

If you do not wish to take seller to court then the only thing to do is give bad feedback!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a signature.

 

Apparently, the neighbour shares my name as the signature is in my name, despite the tracking showing that the parcel was left with neighbours. The house number where it was left, and the signature, are illegible.

 

 

There was no card left.

 

 

 

My main concern was actually that the ebay buyer protection has been changed, from the advertised "your item or your money back" to be a "if the item was delivered within a certain radius of your house we won't pay".

 

That means that there is no cover for items left in the garden and stolen - the courier GPS would show they were near the house. Neither is there any cover for items left with neighbours that then vanish, or the item handed to the casual stranger in the street.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think eBay have changed their policies at all.

 

They simply look at the online tracking - if it states delivered and it's been signed for its enough for them. You case is with the seller who should then take this up with the courier company - after all is said and done the seller paid for the service and the contract is with him.

 

If you can prove non delivery you are entitled to a full refund. You simply have to decide if it is worth the hassle of pursuing a claim against the seller. If it's only for a few pounds it's probably not worth the effort or expense simply to prove a point - but that's up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The online tracking does not state delivered, it states left with neighbour.

 

The seller confirmed, through ebay messages, that the item was delivered to a neighbour, ebay CS read that message to me.

 

They have also looked at GPS (I assume), and decided that the courier was close enough.

 

If the courier was near your house at the time they state delivered that now counts as proof, and I feel that is not good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say cost is too small for a claim at court but I don't believe there is a lowest limit, clearly you would have to pay a fee but this could be recovered if you were successful, if the courier (or the ebay seller) cant actually give an address it was delivered too this would be favourable for you to win.

 

Id be tempted to go down this route, send a letter before action first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know what courier was used - might be worth naming them !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The courier used was UK Mail.

 

They must have an arrangement with ebay where ebay can see more tracking than the normal consumer, as the CS rep was able to see that the courier had been within an "allowable distance". There is also a house number where it was left, this is not readable, a signature, not readable but the courier has filled in that it is signed for in my name. (How likely is that, when it was left at the neighbours?).

 

The seller confirmed all of the above to me, and to ebay.

 

 

I am still amazed that ebay can change buyer protection to be "allowable distance" even when there is evidence that the item was not delivered.

 

 

Rather more seriously, I have the buyer protection claim denied on my record. Ebay have never stated what the implications are, but I suspect that it is treated as a potentially fraudulent claim, so I am more likely to be turned down in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - I have had a refund from the seller.

 

However, it still leaves me with no confidence in ebay, the seller did not have to refund.

 

 

Ebay without buyer protection is not safe, there is no way of getting the sellers name and address unless it is on the listing, ebay will only give the phone number and town.

 

It also leaves me with the "false" buyer protection claim on my ebay record.

 

 

I have learned my lesson, don't buy via ebay unless you are prepared to gamble on whether you get your item.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I understand your frustration, millions or purchases / sales are made on Ebay every year, the percentage of complaints appears to be comparatively small.

 

The seller has probably refunded you in order not to have negative feedback themselves.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ultimately it's not the sellers fault the courier didn't do his job right. However how they handle your complaint is their issue. You got refunded so thats the main thing, most wouldn't bother.

 

You can get a sellers details even if they are not listed on the page. You need to click the 'request sellers details' link somewhere on ebay, i forget where.

 

If you want to fire a complaint to UK Mail then this is the guy - [email protected].

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paypal buyer protection is still available, although I understand that your (and my) concern is that the Ebay response described appears to be entirely unreasonable.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you "pull" the sellers details you get the town, and a phone number.

 

You no longer get the address. The phone number is permitted to be a mobile, ebay no longer insist on a landline being provided.

 

Of course you could phone the seller and ask for their address, but I can't see that working.

 

It used to be possible to get the seller address by ticking "cheque" during check out, then paying by paypal, but most sellers only take paypal now.

 

Ebay have always argued that buyers don't need the seller's address, as buyer protection is there to protect them, and ebay will get the money back from the seller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...