Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cardiff - Intended Prosecution....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening all,

 

Came home from a few days away to find a lovely letter (in Welsh..!!) from the South Wales Police - 38mph in a 30mph Limit - I always thought the road was a 40mph; anyway my fault.

 

Couple of questions.....

 

1 - Likely outcome... £100 & 3 points or what's the chance of being offered the Awareness Course?? (currently licence is clean, and has been for over 7 years.)

 

2 - I thought they have to supply a photo? or does that only come along if you deny / argue and it goes to court? It would be a rear pic anyway as it was a Gatso jobbie at some traffic lights.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providing that you have had no previous speeding convictions in the last three years you should be offered a SAC for this.

 

No photo at this stage - only if you opt to contest the ticket

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll be offered a course for anything up to 42 in a 30 provided you haven't done one in the last 3 years. Whether or not you've had any other convictions doesn't matter - just whether you've already done the course.

 

They don't have to provide a photo at this point. You can ask to see one if you like and they might provide one - but they don't have to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Newport Road A4161 / Rover Way junction - there's a Gatso - I thought it was a red light camera. Obviously not..!! Had a look on Streetview (i know it's out of date) but can't see any speed limit signs or camera warning signs either.

 

Got offered the course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Newport Road A4161 / Rover Way junction - there's a Gatso - I thought it was a red light camera. Obviously not..!! Had a look on Streetview (i know it's out of date) but can't see any speed limit signs or camera warning signs either.

 

Got offered the course.

 

Whoops, it's been there a while now, plenty of signs too! :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

And also as they will tell you on the course, if no signs but there are street lights every x meters then that signifies 30 UNLESS signposted otherwise

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just got done same bloody spot... 37mph, thought it was a 40. no houses or signs that I could see but there were road works in August that may have confused me.

 

Would love to fight this but nothing to go on!

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

read my comment above

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read my comment above

 

I have ..just peed as it was a genuine mistake. Hope for a course as I drive for a living. No points in 20 years.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got my "Driver Education Course" on Monday, same spot. I too thought it was a 40, I was doing 36 doh.gif.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got my "Driver Education Course" on Monday, same spot. I too thought it was a 40, I was doing 36 doh.gif.

 

Glad you kept 3 points off. When I drove through there were road works with 30 on, and wrongly i presumed it was just for those works. I have the photos and one car is clearly moving faster than me nearer to the camera. I wonder if they got a ticket as well.

 

 

I drive for a living and have rarely been as confused.

 

Anyway it is what it is and hopefully I will get the course.

 

Oh and I have sent the form back twice now and its not been received ....although an accompanying letter asking for the photos was received! ??

 

I have phoned and spoken to them to complain.. They said I had to comply by the date which I have apparently over run. However I correctly informed them that the form supplied which I have a photo copy is over written and you can not read the date therefore no offence can have been committed. They agreed they knew about the overwritten date so had to agree. Nice to get a small dig in!

 

Not sure if you have seen my success in the consumer credit courts. ..:-)

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Right coming back to this as I recently went back to Cardiff again....Newport Road A4161 / Rover Way junction

 

Coming off the dual carriageway down to the roundabout and heading into Cardiff past the retail sector...there are no speed signs up until 5 meters from the traffic lights where 1 30mph sign is fixed at a 7ft height.

 

Given that the road is 3 and 4 lanes wide it is legally a dual carriageway at 70mph. If it wants to be 30 mph it needs to say so between the exit of the dual carriageway and the main road into Cardiff and a good warning distance before the Gatso.

 

In my opinion there also needs to be speed signs in the outside lanes of the dual carriageway. Not only is it unsafe to look so far across but there may well be a van or bus blocking your view.

 

I believe it also fails as if you are in the 3rd and 4th lane you are expected to look onto the grass verge upon a tree to see the said 30mph sign. This is clearly unsafe and more akin to private clamping companies tacticts.

 

If someone living in Cardiff could double check this it would be appreciated. As I may well now challenge on the above grounds.

 

Regards Jack

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at Streetview, opposite Burger King, I could not see any 30 signs. However, there are plenty of lamp posts on both sides of the road/carriageways.

 

 

Unless there are signs saying otherwise, street lighting (on posts or otherwise) within 200 yards of each other, automatically defines a 30mph speed limit. In those circumstances, signs or repeater signs are not a requirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at Streetview, opposite Burger King, I could not see any 30 signs. However, there are plenty of lamp posts on both sides of the road/carriageways.

 

 

 

Unless there are signs saying otherwise, street lighting (on posts or otherwise) within 200 yards of each other, automatically defines a 30mph speed limit. In those circumstances, signs or repeater signs are not a requirement.

 

Hi Tony,

 

I totally agree with where you are coming from but that can't be strictly true as some motorway stretches etc have 200 yrd lights and no other speed signs.

 

In one of their responses they actually say " that once they have indicated what the speed limit is (which I can not see) as long as there is the street lighting it is 30mph and they do not have to put any more speed signs up.

 

However I am also unsure if the lighting rule only applies to streets with houses?

 

I just thing if 5000 a year are getting stopped on this one and another 12,000 stopped down the road there is something amiss!

 

 

I believe the law only allows Speed cameras to be put in accident blackspots ...is this really one? Ever?

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tony,

 

I totally agree with where you are coming from but that can't be strictly true as some motorway stretches etc have 200 yrd lights and no other speed signs.

 

 

Motorways are 'Special Roads' and are not subject to the same legislation - s.82(3) & 84(2)(4), Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Raykay,

 

Excellent always good to know one way or the other.

 

Where legally do I stand regarding, whether there does need to be a speed notice in place despite the street lights as indication, given that it is not a residential area?

 

How would I know it is not a motorway as it is 3 lanes wide and their are no speed signs.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would I know it is not a motorway as it is 3 lanes wide and their are no speed signs.

 

Ever read the Highway Code?

 

Motorways are announced by blue signs, and other signs detailing restricted use and speed limit signs at the commencement/joining point - usually the black and white 'National Limit' sign that means 70 not, as in the old days, "no speed limit".

 

Equally the end of Motorway regulations is clearly signposted.

 

The Highway Code explains all this for those who don't take an interest in their surroundings.

And once you've been through that, try "Roadcraft" a police book that taught me so much 60 years ago, but still highly relevant today with very few modification, even in the driving madness where I now live!

Edited by Tony P
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Where legally do I stand regarding, whether there does need to be a speed notice in place despite the street lights as indication, given that it is not a residential area?

 

 

Residential area or not, if there are street lights not more than 200yards apart, and a restricted road (30 mph limit), only terminal signs are required.

 

 

Any other road (except a 'Special Road), that has street lights (as above), needs repeater signs to indicate the limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever read the Highway Code?

 

Motorways are announced by blue signs, and other signs detailing restricted use and speed limit signs at the commencement/joining point - usually the black and white 'National Limit' sign that means 70 not, as in the old days, "no speed limit".

 

Equally the end of Motorway regulations is clearly signposted.

 

The Highway Code explains all this for those who don't take an interest in their surroundings.

And once you've been through that, try "Roadcraft" a police book that taught me so much 60 years ago, but still highly relevant today with very few modification, even in the driving madness where I now live!

 

Hey your knowledge is invaluable despite tardiness. This is how I have won so many legal challenges and set legal precedents. Not just those in my in my link. all representing myself.

 

My interest in this case is not for myself but to understand how Cardiff can have such a high rate of speeding capture on two cameras aprx a mile apart, compared to the rest of the speed cameras in the country.

 

 

Then I would be correct to presume it was dual carriageway and as there were no speed signs and it was not a residential area and the national speed limit is 70 and I was doing 38.

 

As i drive for a living i have my own understanding of the law but it may not be correct so asking questions no matter how simple helps me to the answer if indeed there is one. My own opinion is Cardiff are using this as a cash cow and may or not be acting within the law.

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Then I would be correct to presume it was dual carriageway and as there were no speed signs and it was not a residential area and the national speed limit is 70 and I was doing 38.

 

 

Even though it is a dual carriageway in a non residential area, as there are street lights and no repeater signs = restricted road, 30mph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks for some totally crap answers..

 

Cardiff withdrew their intended prosecution when I pointed out that there should be speed signs on both sides of the carriageway given it was 4 lanes wide. No points, no fine.

 

Honestly if you don't know, don't give out smug answers you make your selves look stupid.

 

I pat myself on the back for fighting alone.. which I have never had to do before on this forum!

 

M also stands for Muppet

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for some totally crap answers..

 

Cardiff withdrew their intended prosecution when I pointed out that there should be speed signs on both sides of the carriageway given it was 4 lanes wide. No points, no fine.

 

Honestly if you don't know, don't give out smug answers you make your selves look stupid.

 

I pat myself on the back for fighting alone.. which I have never had to do before on this forum!

 

Well done.

 

One query - your above post seems not to be full of the altruism of this one -

 

My interest in this case is not for myself but to understand how Cardiff can have such a high rate of speeding capture on two cameras aprx a mile apart, compared to the rest of the speed cameras in the country.

 

If this truly is your motive, I trust you have already made appropriate representations to whomsoever is responsible for road signage at the location - and maybe the Orders imposing speed limits, etc, etc. These are the concerns of other than the police, who just enforce on the basis of the paperwork sooner than what they see on the street.

 

I am sure many motorists would appreciate that constructive response sooner than what could be seen as a bit of vindictive crowing.

 

But with absolute sincerity I repeat my first two words above - "Well done".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...