Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage debt from Germany


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3253 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caggers recently returned from Germany and have a couple of questions.

 

We had a house, sold it and owe the bank the mortgage difference. We signed contracts for the house sale prior to leaving germany a few weeks ago. The Bank as far as I'm aware have not stopped teh sale (which is not surprising to be honest) as they'll want as much back as possible. I know the buyers have until Jan 12 to pay up and the solicitor we used to use in germany is truly exceptional and would have informed us if there were any problems. We know we owe money just not the amount and we want to pay it back anyway, well as much as we can afford until the better half gets a better job. The bank knows my new address etc in the UK, so it's not like we've done a runner. Now my question is why haven't the bank got in contact to say by the way you owe us this much money how you gonna pay it?

 

Also due to the signing of contracts and the wife stopping work, I'm not paying the full monthly repayment as normal.

 

Ta

 

PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now my question is why haven't the bank got in contact to say by the way you owe us this much money how you gonna pay it?
They're probably waiting until the sale is completed and monies exchanged before they can determine the full shortfall. The legal and conveyancing fees etc will still have to be deducted from the sale first.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi there, teh wife has told me that she received an email from the solicitors to say that the house has gone through as per the date on the contracts. That was at the start of January 12, I've still not heard anything from the bank though to say what the outstanding amount owed is. Should I contact the bank, as I've not been paying the monthly payment since coming back to the UK in November now. I just cannot physically afford that much just on my wage and the wife isn't working yet either. Its a simple choice of pay bills and eat now that I'm in the UK or not eat and pay the bank the monthly amount! I've opted for the pay bills from the UK and eat. I'm more than happy to pay back what I owe but not at the original amount and probably nowhere near what I was paying.

 

I've also had a couple of letters from old companies asking for money - telephone company etc that have now been given to various german solicitors to chase from the looks of it. They are asking for x amount of euros paid into bank account x or else they are off to court. Now my understanding was they could only go/take me to court if I was a resident in the country which I'm not anymore. These other "debts" range from 130 - 1200 euro, depending on which company it is. After reading on the overseas part of the forum I'm a bit confused as to whether they can take me to court when I'm not there, from some of the threads I've read (a very helpful one was to do with BMW finance and the links included by Brig and Gerson). Am I just better off waiting until they get sick of me ignoring them and sell it onto a UK DCA or try and deal with them directly? Knowing what these companies are like in Germany, they have even less sympathy than UK DCAs and the language barrier is a bit of a pain aswell. I'd like to say I'm concerned about the smaller debts but to be honest I'm not, I'm concerned about the lack of contact from the bank and how much they want off me!

 

Any thoughts or help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will huff and puff but given the amounts they are claiming I doubt whether they'll attempt to obtain a CCJ, it just wouldn't be economical for them so they'll more than likely just sell the debts on to a UK debt collector. As they are non-priority debts even if you only paid £1 per month it shows you aren't trying to evade your debts. Given your circumstances even in the unlikely event it ended up in a UK court a Judge wouldn't order you to pay much more.

 

As for the mortgage, I'd wait until they contact you. Obviously they have your contact details and aren't in a hurry so why should you be? Again, any shortfall will be a non-priority debt so you should only pay what you can.

 

Once you find out what the shortfall figure is you'll be able to decide which are your best options as to payments, of which there are several, but it really depends on what they are claiming. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The UK pulled out of cross-border debt collecting, on the basis that our laws are more stringent than cross-border ones and that we have more time to chase debt - ie six years rather than three years before it becamse statute barred.

 

I would ignore the debt collectors, if they try for a CCJ here you do not own any property and can prove you do not live here so they are stuck at the first hurdle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
The UK pulled out of cross-border debt collecting, on the basis that our laws are more stringent than cross-border ones and that we have more time to chase debt - ie six years rather than three years before it becamse statute barred.

 

I would ignore the debt collectors, if they try for a CCJ here you do not own any property and can prove you do not live here so they are stuck at the first hurdle.

 

Does this apply to all eu debt including a mortgage short fall in france

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure, it isn't my area of expertise. I would think though that all mortgage shortfalls have an element of 'self enrichment' in the total and as the mortgage has gone (the deed) then the mortgage shortfall could be deemed to come under the 6 year rule rather than the 12 year rule.

 

Are you now living in France and being chased for a UK mortgage shortfall, if so my understanding is that unless you have a UK address you actually live at the company (or its puppets) can't bring a CCJ against you, especially if the mortgage shortfall came from a repossession which had a court order to start with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sillygirl, thanks for the reply, you've confused me a bit which isn't hard at all and I'm sat down. I was under the impression for a German company to get a CCJ against me I'd have to be living in Germany, which isn't the case anymore, as you have to be a German resident etc. So I cannot see how they could get a UK CCJ for a german debt. PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've confused me too... I only know a tiny bit about UK law, nothing about the German law. I would assume a German company would have to have a UK registered office to bring claims in a UK court.... maybe somebody with more knowledge could help here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I think it's me that's confused you all I've jumped on your entry. My situation is relevant to a mortgage shortfall in France. I would be interested in sillygirls view on my post from earlier today re French mortgage shortfall. Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi Caggers

 

 

Posting on behalf of a friend as they've asked me to see if I can help them in any way. My friends owned a house in Germany and they left knowing that there was still money going to be outstanding on the mortgage after their house was sold. They informed the bank prior to leaving whereabouts they would be living whilst back in the UK that was back in 2011. They haven't heard anything since moving to the UK until yesterday. My friends wife received an email from the legal department of the bank with a breakdown of what was outstanding and an agreement needed to be reached. I came on here to do a bit of research but its sketchy what I found, and the European Commission website doesn't have most of the pages working that I wanted to read. I did read on another Germany related thread that the Statue of Limitation in Germany is 3 years from the last payment year which in my friends case was 2011. They have had told me that they have not heard anything from the bank since their last payment in December 2011, showing that 3 years had past with no further payments or contact from the bank. This bearing in mind that the bank had my friends address etc in the UK. I've had a look at their paperwork, used a bit of google translate and it seems they own 34K on the mortgage which looks mostly interest outstanding, then they have a personal loan of 14k outstanding which they said they used for renovation. My question is should I tell them not to worry so much due to 3 years passing or is it worth them replying to the email the wife has had? Or is it a different kettle of fish when a mortgage is involved; they are content to ignore as they cannot afford to pay it back anyway. Thanks PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caggers

 

 

Posting on behalf of a friend as they've asked me to see if I can help them in any way. My friends owned a house in Germany and they left knowing that there was still money going to be outstanding on the mortgage after their house was sold. They informed the bank prior to leaving whereabouts they would be living whilst back in the UK that was back in 2011. They haven't heard anything since moving to the UK until yesterday. My friends wife received an email from the legal department of the bank with a breakdown of what was outstanding and an agreement needed to be reached. I came on here to do a bit of research but its sketchy what I found, and the European Commission website doesn't have most of the pages working that I wanted to read. I did read on another Germany related thread that the Statue of Limitation in Germany is 3 years from the last payment year which in my friends case was 2011. They have had told me that they have not heard anything from the bank since their last payment in December 2011, showing that 3 years had past with no further payments or contact from the bank. This bearing in mind that the bank had my friends address etc in the UK. I've had a look at their paperwork, used a bit of google translate and it seems they own 34K on the mortgage which looks mostly interest outstanding, then they have a personal loan of 14k outstanding which they said they used for renovation. My question is should I tell them not to worry so much due to 3 years passing or is it worth them replying to the email the wife has had? Or is it a different kettle of fish when a mortgage is involved; they are content to ignore as they cannot afford to pay it back anyway. Thanks PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I have read it is 3 years from the last day in the year in which the claim arose. The tricky aspect is when does the limitations period start from. When did this debt arise under German law ? This might be from the date that the property was sold and the debt amount was then stated. I would have thought that the German mortgage provider would have sent a statement showing the amount that was due. This would have been issued to the address they had at the time.

 

If they are being chased for this debt, then they need to make a request under German Data Protection law for copies of all the paperwork issued by or on behalf of the German mortgage company.

 

It would be possible for the current owner of the debt to make a claim via a UK court if the debtor is resident here and they would consider whether under German law the debt was still capable of enforcement. This is why the paperwork would be needed to see when the debt arose and to get specific advice about when the limitations period started.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...