Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Picked up on a thread on PP's blog regarding Barry Beavis... http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/barry-beavis-chooses-john-de-waal-qc.html

 

Anyone else spot the deliberate mistake?

 

sign.jpg

 

ROFL.gif

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Picked up on a thread on PP's blog regarding Barry Beavis... http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/barry-beavis-chooses-john-de-waal-qc.html

 

Anyone else spot the deliberate mistake?

 

sign.jpg

 

ROFL.gif

 

If they repeat the same mistake, is it "mistake" or "mistakes"?!

 

"It's a licence charge / genuine pre-estimate of loss / charge for trespass ...... In no way is it an unenforceable penalty"

 

"Well, it kind of says it's a penalty, Ya know, in the bit where it says in large font '£70 penalty'!

It gets repeated further down as "penalty information"

Link to post
Share on other sites

But this is the problem with the wording of the learned gentlemen's findings at the appeal. They have turned consumer contract law on its head and now the sign IS correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites
But this is the problem with the wording of the learned gentlemen's findings at the appeal. They have turned consumer contract law on its head and now the sign IS correct.

 

So they're specifically 'penalties' now? That should make life interesting cool.png

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course it doesn't give anyone the opportunity to a reduced amount if paid quickly, not that it should be paid at all of course.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
Does that sign mean that BB holders can only park in disabled bays and nowhere else?

 

Supermarket signage state parent and child \ toddler only in marked bays I did write to one about the issue but they chose to ignore me

But if those bays are full can't park elsewhere either

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...