Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The FCA has publicly censured Premier FX Limited (Premier FX) for failing to safeguard its customers’ money and for misuse of its payment accounts under the Payments Services Regulations. In doing so, Premier FX seriously misled its customers about the services it was authorised to provide and how it held customers’ money. View the full article
    • I have sent a response to quote that and also say that i will be submitting my already prepared claim to the county court   Thanks for the quick response! I will see what happens next
    • The High Street-only retailer says it has lost £1.1bn in sales due to the recent lockdown. View the full article
    • Ignore it.   Or,   If it were me I would send in the following email  
    • Below is the response i have received to the emailed version of the letter of claim.  They should get the actual letter today       Thank you for contacting our Executive Office team. My name is Gavin and your email has been received and I have personally been asked to investigate this matter for you.   I’m very sorry this has happened, and I would really like to help you with this today by assisting you in making a claim, should you wish to do so.   I can see that this parcel was booked through Packlink Shipping. Packlink use our network to send their parcels through, but they are an independent shipper and any enquiries about their parcels need to go directly to them.   Here is the link to the Packlink website and claims department: https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360014270619   You can also make contact with Packlink with the links below.   • eBay Delivery Help Center: https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb • Packlink Help Center: https://support.packlink.com/hc/en-gb   I hope this helps you to get your Packlink enquiry resolved.   Kind regards,        
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Supreme Court ruling Vulnerable Single Homeless Council refusing to help?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1598 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

To put it bluntly Councils have been saying to people faced with homelessness that you will have the same issues as the street homeless have now so are not more vulnerable. Also because you have these issues before you become homeless there will be no risk soi we do not have to help you. Judge says [naughty word]!

 

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2015/05/vulnerability-a-fresh-start/

 

Comments

 

This will take some time to consider and work through.

 

The change to the Pereira test is very significant and potentially far reaching. Certainly, council’s decisions on vulnerability will have to be detailed, considered and taking all of the applicant’s particular circumstances into account in a composite way.

 

The old shibboleths of ‘well, the homeless are depressed/take drugs/are at more risk of sexual or physical abuse/self harm/have suicidal ideations’ are out of the window. The use of statistics about the actually homeless is likewise of no relevance to a decision on vulnerability. The Johnson/Ajilore route for councils of finding the already vulnerable amongst the actually homeless as the comparator for the applicant’s vulnerability is at an end.

 

The simple question is ‘Is the applicant more vulnerable than an ordinary person if made homeless?’

 

No doubt elements of this definition will be headed to the Court of Appeal before too long.

 

On third party support, while there is a clear logic and indeed some precedent to Lady Hale’s dissenting view, the judgment makes clear that the simple assumption that an able bodied third party in a household able to offer support to the applicant will overcome the applicant’s vulnerability is not adequate.

 

What must be considered, in detail, is the likely consistency and duration of the support on the one hand, and the adequacy of the support to overcome the vulnerability on the other. Any decision that does not address these issues will fall short, and will also likely fall short on the public sector equality duty also, give the complementary relation to Part VII duties.

 

The findings on the Equality Act are not a surprise to anyone who followed the hearings, but the findings at paras 78 and 79 are a useful indicator that the PSED must be in the decision maker’s mind and there must be a proper focus on the applicant’s disability (or other protected characteristic).

 

There will no doubt be much more on these decisions to follow. It is, I think, the most significant homelessness decision in many years and one which may have an impact on treatment of the group hitherto most hard hit by homelessness decisions, the single homeless.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for posting this, speedy. Worrying, I agree.

 

HB

 

Supreme Court HB so until changed by another SC decision or a higher Court ruling this is the current interpretation of regulations and law!

 

Councils have basically been ignoring the spirit of the law and regulations whilst making their own rules up to deny people who are vulnerable help where the law/regulation has been designed to provide that help.

 

This is the ruling that we (not me personally as I'm just reporting) hope will stop this! Councils are nasty big machines that don't give a ..... The more people who know this and use this the better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a lot of this, and most problems with councils, is that, as always, we don't complain enough. As with council tax, they don't seem to have any interest at all in why you can't pay, just hand it straight over to the bailiffs.

Unless we make ourselves heard, from bringing your bin to your boundary but the dustmen leaving it three doors away, to the leaders £¼million paypacket, nothing will happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel the obstacles councils put in the way of complainants eventually puts them off complaining further. Councils have two or three stage complaints procedures which must be used before anyone can escalate the complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman.

 

In my own case, a simple misplaced apostrophe caused me years of problems with my council who kept saying I had been overpaid housing benefit. The LGO had to visit the council offices to get all the paperwork as the council were reluctant to release them.

 

The result. I won and compensation.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's my experience, silverfox. In my case, they quite clearly hadn't read what was written on my housing forms and had ignored the emails where as well as telling my needs had changed and had also ignored the fact that I can't fill in their inaccessible forms.

 

As a result, I was living somewhere unsuitable and it was becoming more and more difficult. The argument was I should be grateful I should have somewhere to live!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Have some of you read the judgement regarding homelessness from the SC? if not it's worth reading see attachment. This Judgement was issued on the 20/05/2015 see bleow

 

 

Obtained from here https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2014-0185-judgment.pdf

 

This was one of the cases that I have recently watched on (SC TV on demand) from here

https://www.supremecourt.uk/current-cases/index.html

 

 

Sometimes when I am bored I sit and watch some of these cases and how complex they are.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

Councils attemt to excuse their own actions. Even if you write complaint, this doesn't necessarily mean that you get always justice, because they work together afterall. In my experience they sometimes cover each other up and dust up complaint in the early stages. My assumption is that if one proceeds with complaint stages, they should be more vigilant, but I don't have personal experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Councils attemt to excuse their own actions. Even if you write complaint, this doesn't necessarily mean that you get always justice, because they work together afterall. In my experience they sometimes cover each other up and dust up complaint in the early stages. My assumption is that if one proceeds with complaint stages, they should be more vigilant, but I don't have personal experience.

 

 

thread is 2yrs old

now closed.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1598 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...