Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scottish Court Summons - Nolans - Cabot vanquis debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3259 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Im new to the forum and was hoping someone could give me some pointers.

 

Today I received a Court Summons relating to old Vanquis card debt that was sold on to Cabot Financial.

 

The original agreement was taken out in 2006.

 

In August 2014 I received a letter from Nolans (Kirkintilloch) relating to an unpaid debt of £1800.

Between 2009 and 2013 I had only worked for 6 months, hence the inability to pay creditors such as Vanquis.

 

I acknowledged the debt and proceeded in paying Nolans via Standing Order on 9th Sept 2014.

I have not missed any payments to date.

 

In Feb 2015 I received a letter claiming they had previously sent me a Statement of Affairs request.

I had not received the original and returned the 'new' SOA as requested at the end of Feb.

 

Until today I have received no further communication from Nolans.

They claim they sent me a letter to notify me of possible pending court action that I never received.

 

In these circumstances what is the best way to play this?

I will gladly continue to repay the debt,

but they arent my only creditor and I have 5 separate accounts that I am currently paying Lowells for.

 

Im an unsure how to deal with the Court Papers.

 

Any suggestions would be gratefully appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this a Scottish claimform or an English one please?

 

 

I also question why you are blindly paying DCA's on your other 'debts'?

 

 

have you ever sent hem a CCA request for each one?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this a Scottish claimform or an English one please?

 

 

I also question why you are blindly paying DCA's on your other 'debts'?

 

 

have you ever sent hem a CCA request for each one?

 

 

dx

 

Its a Scottish claimform.

 

Im repaying the other debts because I have no reason to challenge them. I know they are valid debts that I owe.

 

My main issue at present is what is likely to happen with this court summons.

 

The facts are:-

 

I arranged a DMP via Standing Order with Nolans to pay off the credit card debt that was sold to Cabot.

 

Nolans sent me a letter in Feb 2015 that stated that I had not returned a Statement of Affairs that they had sent recently, which I never received. A blank SOA was attached to this "reminder letter" I sent an updated SOA to them which I have since received no acknowledgement of.

 

Today (3 months later) I received a court summons which on it states "The pursuers have made frequent requests to the Defender to make payment of the said sum but the defender has refused or delayed to do so" I dispute this because I have been paying them via Standing Order without missing any payments since the arrangement was set up in Sept 2014.

 

So whats likely to happen at court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what have you received please

 

small claimslink3.gif for value up to £3000

 

Summary Cause for value £3000 - £5000

 

Ordinary Action for over £5000

 

you certainly need to get a CCA request

off to the pursuer

blank £1 PO don't sign anything.

 

also with regard to your other debts:

I know they are valid debts that I owe. - they'll need one too

whilst you are at it .

just remember a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a small claims summons I have received.

 

I will send a CCA request tomorrow morning. If they fail to reply within the 12+2 days what is the next course of action for me?

 

How does this affect my court papers return date of 8th June?

 

Does the fact that Ive been repaying them since September not mean Ive admitted my liability for the debt?

 

Do I send the CCA request to Nolans or Cabot Financial? Ive only ever had correspondence from Nolans. I dont have any record of any original account numbers

 

I have just had a quick look on Noddle. Its occured to me that this debt may be statute barred by now. How do I prove this? I dont have any original account number so cant contact Vanquis to prove when the last payment was made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the sar

you'll not have time

 

 

was there a full 5yrs BEFORE this:

I acknowledged the debt and proceeded in paying Nolans via Standing Order on 9th Sept 2014. ring vanquis and ask date of last payment.

 

 

when you paid nothing to vanquis or anyone?

 

 

if you don't know, ring vanquis and ask.

 

 

CCA request goes to cabot

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...