Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Journo Russell Scott has been looking at people who sold PPE to the Johnson government. https://twitter.com/RussellScott1/status/1780686322908487787  
    • It is important that you do the reading about this subject in the sub- forum. It's not complicated but you need to be in control and I don't think you are. For instance, much of the information you need and also the case transcripts that you're looking for are in the fixed topics at the top of this sub- forum but clearly you didn't know that. You will gain in confidence if you do the reading. Particularly as it now looks as if the mediation has not worked because EVRi have stayed you up and so you may now be going to trial. You need to understand thoroughly what you are doing. We will help you and you will find our support is unstinting but you have to do your part. Please spend a lot of time reading the stories on the sub- forum especially the pinned posts at the top of the sub- forum and then start preparing your court bundle. We have instructions here for everything
    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RBS, Capquest, Wescott Credit - all about to pay by the Ombudsman?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes but the FOS letters don't mention PPI at all

the investigation/complaint was done solely upon/because of the payment issues.

 

 

so

if there was PPI up for grabs and the FOS said yes you can make a sep complaint

you or I would accept the present redress

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

'....You or I would accept the present redress....'

 

That's what I was looking for! So not a lot a point in debating negotiating you don 't think - take the offer and make a separate issue of the PPI?

 

It all makes good sense, it's just that I have no idea how....'flexible' for want of a better expression, the FOS is / can be.

 

The fact that I have in writing an admission of culpability from RBS in the eyes of the FOS just makes me want to flog that horse for every last penny.

 

You guys have been with me on this journey - you must know where I'm coming from???

Link to post
Share on other sites

have we a record here of you stating about the PPI to the fos

is there a copy of your org complaint letter?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made mention of PPI in my very first letter to RBS, which subsequently was part of what then became the initial letter to FOS.

 

That was over a year ago.

 

Subsequent to that I have mentioned the notion of PPI - then the realisaion I had proof of PPI from the RBS SAR info - and repeatedly throughout Email correspondence.

 

In short, yes, FOS are very aware - and it's well documented - that from the very outset I was initially curious as to whether PPI had ever been applied and latterly could actually, physically prove PPI had been applied. Yet they make no mention of it in todays letter.

 

It's not for a lot at all btw (about £160ish?) - but it's because smaller things like this have been omitted in the FOS consideration that makes me wonder / want to really see if I can push them.

 

My real issue is that I have no real understanding of the FOS and the way it operates.

 

For instance and as a blunt example: Would it be 'wrong' / 'silly' of me to simply write back (adding the recent Capquest dramatics which I didn't even have time to update FOS on yet i.e. cheque / no cheque - SAR not received / SAR complied with but sent to old address etc. ) - and inform them that I do not accept their offer but would consider....£3000?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you an email contact on that fos letter?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear xxxxx

I thank you for your proposed decision letter ref xxxxxx received toda

 

May I ask where the PPI charged on my loan (was it a loan ow?)

Sits within this decision?

 

Would this be subject to me making a separate complaint. Please

And what are your views in doing such?

Or is it included in your decision?

As I can't see no mention toward it.

 

It appears the PPI has taken a somewhat back seat

Sorry if this is my innocence in not correctly outlining PPI

In myu initial complaint

 

Regards

 

Open water

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO no leave as is

 

Put their ref in the email title

 

One step at a time ow

 

If PPI is open to a sep complaint then accept it

 

If PPI is or will be Inc we run it further

 

Wait for the reply

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that email sent

await the reply.

 

 

you cant decide til you know the answer to that

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Received an Email response from the FOS today. I've copy-and-paste it below:

 

'Mr Xxxxxx

 

Thanks for your recent email following receipt of my provisional decision.

 

Just to clarify – the gaps are about how this mess happened. I’m not expecting you to provide me with any additional information. I already have a hefty case file with lots of information you’ve given us. And based on what I’ve seen, I know what I think is a fair outcome. I’m just giving RBS a final opportunity to see whether they agree with me.

 

I’ve not reviewed any aspect of a claim against RBS for any PPI which you may have paid and think you shouldn’t have been sold. As far as I can tell from our case history about you, no formal complaint has ever been given to us about a PPI complaint. Before you panic, I may be wrong as PPI cases are dealt with differently from this type of case so I’ll ask Xxxxx (my assistant) to look into this and confirm back to you.

 

If you’re happy with the provisional decision, please let me know. If RBS confirm back to us one way or the other, I’ll be able to get on with completing this case.

 

Kind regards

Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx'

 

What do you make of that guys (Dx?)? The tone is surprising to me. Quite assertive, albeit polite.

 

And the part: 'And based on what I’ve seen, I know what I think is a fair outcome' - I'd love to know how this 'fair outcome' came to be decided. I can't even begin to deduce what a fair outcome would be???

 

Thing is, I'm not happy with the decision (as I've mentioned in the past few posts on here) - so should I advise so? And regards PPI, do I push it or let it be?

 

Dx, I need your wisdom my friend...

 

 

Openwater

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thank you for you reply.

 

No I have not officially entered any PPI complaints regarding this current debacle.

 

so, I suppose what im really was asking is that I 'can' now make a PPI complaint.

just thought it might have been treading on your toes, if, ppi were a part of your process.

 

 

I thus accept your proposed offer

 

 

I thank you once again

and sorry if I confused you any

 

 

you have been most helpful.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify – the gaps are about how this mess happened. I’m not expecting you to provide me with any additional information. I already have a hefty case file with lots of information you’ve given us. And based on what I’ve seen, I know what I think is a fair outcome. I’m just giving RBSlink3.gif a final opportunity to see whether they agree with me.

 

you could point out that you feel the offer is a little lower than what you expected, and give a very very brief explanation why.

but you appear now to have the added bonus of ppi refund on top of this sum.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Guys (Dx?),

 

It looks like - after 18 months - it's final decision time. I've had a response from the Ombudsman following my Email as per above. Here it is:

 

'Mr XXXX

 

I thought I’d let you know RBS emailed me to say they accept the outcome of the provisional decision and are happy to settle on that basis without asking me to complete a final decision.

 

I know in our emails last Thursday you said you were looking for more than being offered in the provisional decision. I’ve reviewed the file again but overall think I’ve come to the right outcome based on the evidence. I know debts were being collected back before 2005 (when the two companies became involved) but there were at least four different accounts so I think there’s a fair chance some of that may have been for other accounts. But in any case I’m satisfied the debt was £3,489.42 when passed to both debt agencies. Therefore overall I’d be re-stating what was in my provisional decision.

 

If you now want to accept this outcome, we can sort out the final paperwork and get you the money you’re due without now going to a final decision. Alternatively I’m happy to write a final decision but this won’t be any different to my provisional decision. And RBS are already bound to implement the decision as they’ve accepted it.

 

Do let me know what you’d like to do.

 

Kind regards

XXXX'

 

So first off, a WOOP WOOP WOOP :whoo: - I've WON! :-D

 

However, I do have some questions (and these will be the last ever I guess) I would be very grateful if you could help me out with;

 

1) What is the difference (or what is the difference to me) regarding accepting the offer before the FOS make a final decision as per her mail? Is it in my interest at all to have a final decision? I have no idea what the difference is

 

2) RBS, having accepted the FOS decision and consequently the payout to me associated with it, are clearly accepting they are culpable. Is there room to push them further as a consequence?

 

3) If anyone has ANY comments /suggestions / advice before I reply PLEASE let me know - it could be invaluable...

 

Thank you all in advance,

 

Openwater

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) What is the difference (or what is the difference to me) regarding accepting the offer before the FOS make a final decision as per her mail?

Is it in my interest at all to have a final decision? I have no idea what the difference is - wanna wait another 3mts for nothing more...?

2) RBS, having accepted the FOS decision and consequently the payout to me associated with it, are clearly accepting they are culpable.

Is there room to push them further as a consequence? - no other than PPI

3) If anyone has ANY comments /suggestions / advice before I reply PLEASE let me know - it could be invaluable...yes get on with it...

Thank you all in advance,

 

Openwater

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx, Dx.... I owe you so much for guiding me through this incredible journey. I quite simply could not have got this far without your wise words and occasional...'prompting' :-)

 

So - and it's my last question so please do entertain me - quite simply a straightforward 'I accept' and nothing more?

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I will shortly be starting the PPI reclaim process with them.

 

 

thank you for your time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can be efficient when they want to be (and nice).

 

The response from the FOS:

 

'Thanks very much for this prompt response. I’m attaching a settlement form for you to sign and return – I’m more than happy for you to scan it and email it back as that’ll probably be easier.

 

I completely understand you’d want a letter from RBS confirming no further monies are due from you and they’ll make sure both Wescot and CapQuest cease any further action. I’ll make sure RBS do this. I did refer to this in the PD so they won’t be surprised.

 

The rule is a bank has four weeks after they get the settlement form to make sure they’ve done what’s required. There may be a delay because of Christmas – and them ensuring how you want to be paid (send a cheque/direct to bank account) but it certainly shouldn’t take longer than this. Because of the experience you’ve had I will be asking RBS to get the ball rolling and make sure everything’s done as speedily as possible.

 

I hope that helps.'

 

And there it is.

 

My journey seems to be over.

 

It's been prolonged. It's been frustrating. It's been tiresome. It's been difficult.

 

BUT IT'S BEEN WORTH IT!!!!!! :whoo: :whoo: :whoo:

 

And so to return to my header, which was indeed a question when I first wrote it all those months ago;

 

RBS, Capquest, Wescott Credit - all about to pay by the Ombudsman?

 

The answer is YES, indeed they are!!! :lol:

 

Thank you CAG but in particular site team member Dx100uk - you know who you are - I've never met you and most probably never will but from the bottom of my heart:

 

THANK YOU SO MUCH - I HAVE RUN OUT OF SUPERLATIVES TO EXPRESS WHAT YOU'VE DONE FOR ME - I AM INDEBTED TO YOU

 

And for anyone reading this thread for inspiration or help all I can say is DO NOT GIVE UP - You CAN take on these institutions and win - I'm the proof right here.

 

Finally, when my money does come through, my first payment will be - without hesitation - to CAG

 

Thank you all once again,

 

Openwater

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...