Jump to content


Mortimer Clarke Solicitors (HSBC old debt)


napoleonhill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter is being chased by Mortimer Clark Solicitors on behalf of Cabot Financial for a debt of £2051 owed to HSBC going back to 2008.

 

Her total debt:

HSBC £2051, £500, and £4500.

RCI £4500,

(CCJ) Blackhorse £4536,

Captia £800.

 

Her scenario is as follows,

she left the UK in 2009 and moved to Austria with her partner also English,

he had been paying the £2051 debt from April 2013 until December 2014 when he stopped as he and my daughter had a disagreement.

 

My daughter has two children but doesn’t work, her only income is family allowance which she needs to support her children.

 

Just recently she has been studying to become an accountant supported by my wife and me,

but should she obtain another CCJ it would hinder employment in the accountancy profession and her chance to repay anything.

 

I think Mortimer Clark Solicitors are trying to obtain a charge on a property my daughter owns jointly with my wife.

 

However, the property is in negative equity and the mortgage is being subsidised by my wife and me and has been since 2006.

 

Court papers have been delivered to the property in the UK, but my daughter lives permanently in Austria.

 

What do you suggest as a way to help my daughter,

 

but also protect my wife’s interest in the property

 

she owns jointly with my daughter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the debts?

Loans, credit cards, overdrafts, current accounts?

 

If she lives in Austria then who signed for the court papers?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you should return them RTS not known at this address, and as it is an overdraft this will be full of reclaimable charges.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well IMO she isn't going to be able to defend any legal action because she doesn't live in this country, therefore, I would RTS the letter, you could mark it 'No longer resides at address'?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you saying they HAVE sent court papers to do with the charge

giving a hearing date?

 

 

when did she move to Austria

 

 

when did the get the CCJ?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then the CCJ should never have been granted if the defendant is resident abroad.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

if she was outside the country and has proof

go get the CCJ set aside.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...