Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting they're not mentioning Barclaycard. Just Barclays Bank UK PLC. This may have been an Egg card ...but I simply don't know.
    • Just to be clear, the (£75) compliance stage fee is triggered the moment the instruction to undertake the Schedule 12 procedure is received by the enforcement agent/company - not on sending the Notice of Enforcement. That said, if you don't pay it, it can only be recovered using the Schedule 12 procedure if the Notice has been correctly 'given'.  To do that it must be given to the place, or one of the places where you usually live or carry on a trade or business.  Which, as I see it, has not been achieved.  The (£235) enforcement stage fee applied by attending an address where you don't live or carry on a trade or business is not enforceable and cannot be recovered using the Schedule 12 procedure. If they find your current address, they would have to re-issue a Notice of Enforcement to you at that address before being able to undertake the Schedule 12 procedure. In your place I would pay the debt plus the £75.00 direct to the council, leaving them to pay the £75 to the enforcement agent/agency.  While not (at this stage) enforceable, the £75 is due under the liability order (debt + costs). If you pay the debt direct without paying the £75, the distribution of any payment received, while the liability order is still with the enforcement agent/agency, requires the £75 to be paid first - leaving £75 of debt! Hope this helps  
    • "Customer Appeasement" apparently So they refunded £10.4m without actually receiving the returned goods. Sounds a very thorough fool proof returns system they have there
    • Time for the papers as per @FTMDave's suggestion then.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How long is s21 notice valid for if landlord doesn't act on it?

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Parents in private rented property were given s21 notice as landlord wanted to sell. Daughter has been trying to get a mortgage to buy the property and in the meantime the parents have stayed put with the landlord's permission. Notice expired over 2 months ago.


The sale is taking longer than the landlord would like and they are threatening to pull out. If they do, will they have to issue a new s21 notice?


Am I right in advising that the parents are under no obligation to allow access for viewings etc whilst they are still living there?


"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RMW, I have wanted an answer to this question and have tried to find out.I can see nothing in statute, case law or procedure that says how long a s21 notice persists. My guess is that it would be impossible to define given the way in which such a notice may have been written.The nearest thing I found was in CPR 55.15 (4)(a)(b) which says that, if a claim has been filed under the accelerated procedure and there has been no defence filed then, after 3 months, the claim will be stayed.I think the rental and the buying position are two entirely different things. So long as a landlord is happy for someone to stay, even if s/he has served a s21 notice, then that's OK.There is also the question of a possession order and the execution of it. Even if a possession order has been made then, if the tenant remains, and no bailiff has been appointed then, again, nothing happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIUI a valid s21 served remains valid after Notice expiry date fof that AST particular AST and resultant SPT.

After full implementation of the De Regulation Act it is probable that a s21 will only have a life expectancy of 2 months after expiry of due Notice period.

If sale falls through and no new fixed term AST is signed, the LL does not have to re-serve s21.

Depending on wording in AST, the T can deny access for viewings (if they are not concerned about a LL ref), but rather than a blanket NO, most would suggest T notifies LL in writing, of 2-3 permissible time periods/week for viewings convenient to T, eg Mon 11-2pm, Thu 6-8pm and Sat 11- 2pm, but at .no other days/times or unaccompanied viewings. 1 regular LL member has suggested offering T £20 for each permitted viewing slot, if property is presented clean & tidy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it make a difference that in between times the landlord has died and the property is now owned by his beneficiary - the original landlord signed the s21 notice.


The situation is really complicated - the tenants are both seriously disabled and the property has been adapted for them. Finding another suitable property is proving impossible, even if we subsidise their rent heavily, hence wanting to buy it so badly. We've even approached the council, but as they've lived in the area for less than 2 years then they're not eligible for help despite having moved there to be close to family for support. Any suggestions as to the way forward would be very welcome. We can certainly afford to buy the property between us, but it's neither a straightforward buy-to-let situation nor an ordinary residential mortgage.


"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting Q though belated extra info.

If the property title has been transferred to inheritor - I don't know about s21. it is akin to sale to new LL. If it is still part of deceased's estate with Executor in charge, I would surmise orig s21 is still valid. Title does not cease on death.

What is the delay in arranging sale? I assume new LL still wants to sell, so make him an offer to buy at below market value but above Probate valuation. eg sitting T valuation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delay is getting the mortgage - it can't be a buy to let as it's intended to be occupied by relatives and getting a residential mortgage that's not absolutely straightforward is a nightmare even where everyone has more than adequate income and spotless credit histories. The computer will never say yes so it's finding a lender who is willing to go beyond that and look at individual circumstances.

So far as I know probate has all gone through and deceased wife now owns property.


"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our mortgage broker, who is absolutely brilliant, has been totally unable to find anyone who will lend in these circumstances, so it's now down to whether or not the landlord relies on the original s21 notice or issues a new one as to how long we have to find somewhere else for the parents to live - we can't rely on the new buyer being willing to let to them. Mum is 80 this weekend, what a birthday surprise to be told she's going to have to move from somewhere she loves.


"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With all due respect RMW I suspect that your mortgage broker is not absolutely brilliant as you say though he might be very nice. I was listening to a, mortgage expert, last night doing a phone-in on LBC Radio. He had all manner of tips and advice for people with complex problems. You say the computer will never say yes. The mortgage expert said that a good mortgage broker will go beyond the computer so to speak. Just because your mortgage broker has been friendly and helpful does not mean that another broker might not have better connections and better answers.


Additionally, the s21 matter and obtaining a mortgage are two entirely separate matters in law. You are probably not helping yourself by linking them together, although the circumstances are factually connected.I'm wondering why the LL is in an apparent hurry to sell. What is his position?

Edited by citizenB
Removing firm's name.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem you are having with the majority of lenders is that they do not allow a vendor to stay in the property. Have you looked at lenders that do a second home scheme, this is based on affordability, you can have family living there but there must not be a tenancy agreement. Halifax used to do them, not sure about now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update - our mortgage broker did eventually find someone who would lend which made the s21 issue irrelevant, however we did get legal advice which I'll pass on in case it helps someone else.


In this particular situation accepting rent from the tenants after the notice expired probably wouldn't have made any difference as there would have been no intention to create a new contract - the tenants were only being allowed to stay whilst we sorted out the purchase of the property. However, it would have been down to a court to decide whether this was actually the case which would take longer and cost more than just issuing a new notice.


Where there are no external factors, it would appear that if a landlord continues to accept rent after the notice period expires there would be deemed to be a neew contract in place and therefore the landlord would need to give notice again if he wanted the tenants to leave.


Bottom line is that if you're the landlord, just issue a new notice. If you're the tenant, you could stand your ground but it's really only going to delay the inevitable and may end up costing you.


"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...