Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
    • Anotheruser0000 bear in mind that not all Judges are equally versed in the PoFA regulations. Fortunately now most of them are but sometimes a Judge from a higher Court sits in who is well experienced  in Law but not PoFA. and so they sometimes go "offkey" because their knowledge can raise a different set of arguments and solutions. It does seem particularly unfair  when the decision is so  bad . it can also be that in some situations the motorist being a lay person is not sufficiently know ledgeable to be able to counter a Judge's decisions in a way that a barrister could.
    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pension Credit £212 overpayment?


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Our circumstances have not changed yet we are having a large lump sum for PC paid into our account. Recently we had a visit to our home from the Pension Credit people and they went through a few things with us. I am on Pension Credit and State Pension plus I receive DLA and wife gets PIP plus her state pension.

I phoned to query the rather large amount and was told that this was due to an underpayment for the past 24 weeks however this works out to an underpayment of about £120 a week? By my reckoning it should be about £30 a week or a £120 a month. I am wondering if they took the monthly figure and then times it by the 24 weeks?

I asked the lady again to give us a breakdown on how this figure was deduced and she repeated what she had said earlier and assured me that it was correct.

I asked her to place a note on the file relating to the conversation and she refused stating it would take up too much room. I then asked for a note to be made that I had phoned in and queried the amount and again she refused!

She said for us to go ahead and enjoy the windfall however I am not so sure and have concerns. Should we take her advice and enjoy it or write a letter requesting a breakdown of the amount to cover ourselves? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello there.

 

If it were me, I would write to to query the figure, or at least to confirm your conversation and your interpretation of the figures. That way you should cover your back, and if it turns out to be a windfall you can enjoy it.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you on middle or high rate care of dla, and does your wife get care element of pip? If so you may not have been being paid the double sdp element you would be entitled to which is around £120 a week.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you're entitled to it, so enjoy the windfall - your pension credit should now be £120 ish a week more, also.

 

Do either of you get state pension of more than £62.10 a week?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you're entitled to it, so enjoy the windfall - your pension credit should now be £120 ish a week more, also.

 

Do either of you get state pension of more than £62.10 a week?

my wife gets normal state pension and mine is topped up with pension credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is either of them more than £62.10? If either of you does have state pension more than £62.10 you can claim carer's allowance for the other (if you don't already claim it), you then get underlying entitlement to ca (no actual carer's allowance) and an additional sum of pension credit of just over £30 a week for each carer's allowance. don't claim if state pension is under £62.10 as you would then lose the severe disability premium you've just received.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

We only claim carers allowance for myself. When the lady from the pension credit offcie called around she did speak to us about claiming carers allowance for both of us, but I told her I felt uncomfortable about it as it did not feel right and would feel as if we were money grabbers and exploiting the state. I know it is just me and that we are entitled to it. Both state pensions are in excess of £62.10. We both have problems but are not on the higher rate of care at the moment which is why we were surprised when we were labelled as being entitled to the severe disability premium. To us severe disability is confinement to a wheelchair or bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sdp is badly named really, as it is actually a payment taking into account that life is more difficult to manage being a disabled person living alone or two disabled people living together. Not sure what a good alternative name would be though.

 

If your wife claims carer's allowance she wouldn't actually be paid any, so you wouldn't have to worry about exploiting. All that happens is that she gets awarded 'underlying entitlement' and you get an additional amount of pension credit of £34.60 a week.

  • Haha 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

sdp is badly named really, as it is actually a payment taking into account that life is more difficult to manage being a disabled person living alone or two disabled people living together. Not sure what a good alternative name would be though.

 

If your wife claims carer's allowance she wouldn't actually be paid any, so you wouldn't have to worry about exploiting. All that happens is that she gets awarded 'underlying entitlement' and you get an additional amount of pension credit of £34.60 a week.

Thanks Estellyn for putting our minds at ease.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

In March 2017 we got a letter from the Pension Protection Fund's Assistance Scheme telling us that they would pay my wife £5.15 every month less £1 tax. We had no idea why we were being paid but yesterday found out it was because a pension scheme into which my wife paid had gone into administration.

For some reason I overlooked or forgot to declare this income as I am on pension credit and as a result we have been overpaid about £25.75 for the past 6 months. I never picked it up in my bank statement as it was such a small amount and I never use that account for purchases etc. This was brought to my attention a letter from a compliance officer asking us to pay them a visit.

As it was a genuine mistake I am not too concerned about the visit, but rather than them take £1.18 off every week for the next 6 months, can we ask them to take it in one lump sum or simply just pay it back the 325.75 with a debit card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my limited experience of alleged overpayments, the debt recovery team will demand payment in full. If an offer of a lump sum repayment is accepted during the compliance visit, ask for it to be put in writing.

 

The DWP may decide to impose an administrative penalty. If they do, insist on a mandatory reconsideration of the charge and try to get it annulled.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no doubt it was my fault either overlooking it, forgetting about it or simply assuming that it was of not of interest to us as previous to this and since we have had no other communication from the Assistance Scheme. As we already get a payment from the same people, I may have assumed that they were adjusting the amount and then forgot about it. I do not have an issue refunding the £25.75 over payment however never took into consideration that there may be a penalty. We have always been careful about updating the DWP even if it was not necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my limited experience of alleged overpayments, the debt recovery team will demand payment in full. If an offer of a lump sum repayment is accepted during the compliance visit, ask for it to be put in writing.

 

The DWP may decide to impose an administrative penalty. If they do, insist on a mandatory reconsideration of the charge and try to get it annulled.

 

Compliance officers can't offer administration penalties, you may get a civil penalty though, but unlikely.

 

All they are looking at doing is putting the claim right and finding out what happened.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Pension Credit £212 overpayment?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...