Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Meeting the needs of the business


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon,

I'm after some work related advise;

I work in a kitchen with four other people - 4 of us have "contracts" that are 5/7 & 1 is a weekend worker-

Over the last three months 3 of us have changed our rota to meet the needs of the business - mixed shifts / later shifts & also 1 weekend in three - the fourth person that has a 5/7 contract has now point blank refused to do the same & apparently has said "she'll leave & she can't do weekends or late shifts" now we are at a stage were the three of us are really ****ed off due to this person, while we've bent over backwards to "meet the needs of the business" she is getting away with dictating what she will & won't work, so we are after some advise on how to handle this situation with our management,

We are considering also putting in a grievance regarding this colleague due to the state she leaves the place in half of our paperwork is legal requirements which she is not filling in & also talking to us on several occasions in a not very nice manner, she doesn't clean down & does as little as possible

When she started there, over a year ago I make several verbal complaints about her standards & also documented the state of the kitchen with pictures in an email - we have all recently taken photos again about the state of the kitchen so we have some "evidence" again after some advise on how to deal with the situation as a whole

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi grumpytisaytheleast,

Me & this "difficult" one are on the same pay grade (totally different jobs)

Two are catering assistants 5/7 & 1 weekend staff (who happens to be "difficult" ones daughter)

From what I've been told is she told the manager she would have to leave as she couldn't do those hours, as she has her granddaughter but we all know that she doesn't have her every weekend - she's only expected to do 1 in 4 which isn't unreasonable especially when everyone else is doing the same

The other catering staff have kids & grand kids too, but as we have a rolling rota they work round us, not us round them.

She is also "retired" & tells us pretty much every week "I don't need to be here" & "I don't need to work" "I'm just here for extra spending money"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst you aim all your irks and animosity towards the other employee your employer will be sat back getting the job done.

 

Your issue is with the employer not the person, they may have a tighter contract and be resisting "voluntary change" for all you know, just because you agree to change it does not force everybody else to.

 

You need to raise the issue with the employer and ask when working patterns are changed why only a selection of staff are being involved. Even then unless this person has no right to refuse or they are being treated more favourably than others outside the employers knowledge there is often little you can do apart from argue from a fairness aspect.

 

Don't hate the player, hate the game

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alison,

Thanks for your advise;

It is actually the "difficult" ones tantrum that has led us down this road, originally when the new rota was done, they said & I quote " if she doesn't like it then she can leave" because she's had this tantrum they have back tracked for reasons unknown

She's remiss in her duties & thinks she can dictate what's going to happen.

I've been told the manager left us a note Friday night to tell us of the "new" rota change & that it is to start this Monday, so we've had no consultation with management or been formally told, I've spoken to the other two & we are currently writing a grievance

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other employee's position sounds fair. If they don't want to work weekends, and would resign if they were made to work weekends, that person is entitled to take that position. It is really up to the employer whether they find someone else or whether they stick with him/her.

 

Although obviously if he/she doesn't do her job properly that is a different issue.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had a penny every time "business needs" were invoked to stitch workers up I'd be a millionaire.

And if I had a penny for every employee allowed to do what they want because otherwise they shout loud and trow tantrums... Well you know how it goes.

Unfortunately this troublemaker is in a position where she doesn't care to lose her job, so she can pull the ropes as much as she wants.

A grievance is the best way to go for now.

I used to be a flexible, committed employee, until I found that I was being stitched up (with many others) because I wouldn't complain.

Now, as soon as someone does or says something detrimental to me personally I would make a lot of noise and escalate (unnecessarily) to the highest management level.

Strange enough, I only had to do that once and since then (a couple of years ago), they've left me alone and praise my work at every opportunity (again unnecessarily).

Managers are like wolves: They attack the weakest prey that will go down without a fight.

Please note: This is my personal experience and point of view, I'm sure that many companies out there tackle sloppy employees and reward the good ones, involving them in every decision (or maybe not).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was assertive at work in attempting to get my holidays. I got punished with a promotion

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managers are like wolves: They attack the weakest prey that will go down without a fight.

 

I agree with the sentiment but it isn't just managers, using a more scientific and temperate term we all "follow the path of least resistance".

 

This means managers ask the one who won't complain/kick off and staff ask the manager known for being the one they will get the least grief from.

 

Simple human nature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the sentiment but it isn't just managers, using a more scientific and temperate term we all "follow the path of least resistance".

 

This means managers ask the one who won't complain/kick off and staff ask the manager known for being the one they will get the least grief from.

 

Simple human nature.

 

I now use a different technique: I ask outrageous annual leave to the most feared manager and he never turned it down.

Must feel important or scared to be asked as nobody else asks him.

One way or another I get the leave I want 😁

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...