Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CPN from CAR PARKING PARTNERSHIP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had borrowed a friend's car a couple of weeks ago and parked it at my workplace using the temporary car parking permit

that had been issued (for my car).

 

 

I parked there and only realised my mistake around lunch time, when I ran back to the car park, sadly to see the car parking fine notice stuck to the car.

 

I have a CIVIL PARKING NOTICE from CAR PARKING PARTNERSHIP for £75 which is reduced to £45 if paid within 14 days.

 

 

I have tried to make the payment on a couple of occasions over the last two weeks both through their website and the telephone,

 

 

but the system has returned an error message and I have been unable to make this payment.

 

I'm not keen on paying the £75 fee now, because I think its unreasonably high.

 

Could someone please advice what my options are in this situation?

 

I have been told on other forums that I can simply ignore the notices and that they will eventually give up. IS this true?

 

 

My concern here is not just the possibility that they may take me to court,

 

 

but also that the car is registered to my friend who doesnt even live in Nottingham!

 

 

Will this affect her credit rating or anything else?

 

Many thanks for any advice!

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=+CAR+PARKING+PARTNERSHIP&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=CAR%20PARKING%20PARTNERSHIP&gsc.page=1

 

 

read the threads above

 

 

it is NOT A FINE

 

 

its a speculative invoice.

 

 

so its not a debt

and can never harm a CRA file.

 

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

write to them and identify yourself as the driver at the time and tell them that you put your parking permit on the vehicle so no breach of contract has occurred as your authority to park is supreme to their offer of a contract.

They should have a proper address on their demand for payment, anything that is online only or a PO box number isnt lawful so ultimately they cant take anyone to court and win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...