Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi slick!    On 22 July they said they would refund me £74.07 Theres no DD in place as my membership was a once off payment in November last year.  Hi Dx,    I paid through PayPal last year as a one off payment. 
    • I'm trying to understand it all but I certainly tend to agree with my colleague @dx100uk that it looks as if you may have been taken for a ride. You found an advertisement for a bag on an online sales site. Instead of going through the established procedure of that site, which presumably allows them to recover a commission from the seller you started dealing directly with the seller who is an unknown person to you and of course that allowed the seller to avoid paying the commission. At whose suggestion was it that you went off-site? You then pay by PayPal but instead of logging it with PayPal as a payment for a purchased item, you tell PayPal that it was actually simply a gift or transaction between friends and family. This also allowed the seller to avoid paying a PayPal fee on the money. At whose suggestion was it that you paid in this way?       I don't say that you definitely have been scammed, but it doesn't look very good. This is how it might have happened: after you agreed to take the transaction off-site, so you lost the protection of the established system – and the seller avoided the commission and also avoided the sales site knowing that they had sold their item, you then agreed to pay the seller some money – but not for a purchase – simply as a gift. This has two consequences. Firstly, the seller avoids a PayPal fee and secondly, because PayPal has been misled as to the purpose of the payment, you lose the protection of PayPal if it turns out that you've been scammed or there is some other problem with the transaction. The seller then apparently sent you the parcel and they sent you pictures of a package with your address on it. Separately they sent you a Hermes tracking number – but there is no evidence that the package was actually posted to your address. The seller might simply have taken a picture with your address and sent that to you by way of reassurance – and then changed the label and posted the parcel to themselves but sent you a tracking number which is inaccessible to you and in respect of which you will be prevented from getting any information. All you've seen is a parcel with your address on it. All you've been given is a tracking number which satisfied you for a while until the parcel did not arrive and then when you started to make enquiries, you found that you were unable to access any details referring to the tracking number. Of course the tracking number says that the item was delivered – because maybe it was – but in that case it was delivered to the address on the parcel which might have been the seller's own address – or the address of a friend. I don't want to say that this is definitely how it happened, but it is a plausible scenario. Of course Hermes is an awful lot of parcels – but on the other hand I expect that most of the parcel is that going to Hermes hands are delivered successfully. We only get the bad stories on this forum. I can imagine that Hermes rate of successful deliveries is better than 97% because otherwise people wouldn't simply just hate them, they would go out of business.   We can help you bring a complaint against Hermes if you want. However, on the basis of what you say, the odds are stacked against you but it would be useful to try and find out the address which was associated with tracking number. As far as your apparent willingness to travel hundred and 50 miles to ask for your money back, don't bother. If you did actually go there, are you sure that the seller actually lives at the address that you have been given? What evidence do you have that? Of course if you found that the seller didn't reside at that address then it is slamdunk that you have been scammed. But then what are you going to do? You can try to inform the police but of course it won't get you anywhere. You can inform the sales website – but they will say that you brought it on yourself because you agreed to go off-site. You can inform PayPal – that they will say that because you sent the money which was calculated to avoid their fees, you have lost the protection. If you travelled the 150 miles and found that the seller did reside at that address, do you really think that they are going to hand your money over to you? If they are acting dishonestly then they will simply say that it is nothing to do with them, that they addressed it all correctly and they don't understand what has happened and that this is simply Hermes up to their old tricks. What are you going to do? You simply risk getting into a very nasty argument and depending on how bad it went, you might even find that the police are called and I'm afraid that they would be looking at you – not the seller. Maybe you can answer the questions that I've post above as to who it is who initiated the various ways of doing business.    
    • The legal campaign's going well then. The recount in Wisconsin gave Trump more votes but Biden even more, at a cost of $3m. And a donor to the organisation bringing the failed cases is suing to get his $2.5m back.   https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/28/joe-biden-gains-votes-in-wisconsin-county-after-trump-ordered-recount
    • Yes Unicorn feed tax again, can't sue the keeper for more than the Original Charge, so any additional Debt Collection fees aka the £60 they add is abuse,iof process as per HHJ Harvey at Lewes county Court What lookedinfroinfo is indicating is that the main signage on entry and dotted around is merely an " Invitation to Treat", not the offer, the Offer and Acceptance occurs at the payment machine, so wording there is key.
  • Our picks

faulty replacement Sasaki chair , Hitachi Credit & getting it sorted - help


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2067 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I'm afraid I'm terribly confused by the situation I'm in and can't seem to find a straight answer anywhere.

 

I'll start with a brief outline with dates as close as possible to accurate..

 

Nov 2013 - I purchase a massage chair from Sasaki (credit card deposit, rest on finance)

Feb 2014 - chair is delivered

Feb 2014 - I contact Sasaki stating chair unsuitable. Doesn't fit my build. They were given full info before purchase

Mar 2014 - Sasaki agree to look into replacing, will 'get back to me'

May 2014 - I start section 75 with Hitachi Finance as nothing heard from Sasaki

Jun 2014 - Sasaki agree to replace and upgrade when a new model is available

Aug 2014 - new model available, delivery delayed by my illness

Jan 2015 - new chair is delivered

Mar 2015 - new chair fails mechanically after 6 weeks

 

What I want..

A refund, no more messing

 

What I'm getting

Sasaki say one thing when a call is made on my behalf (not getting anything etc)

Hitachi say something else (Sasaki awaiting an engineer to visit me)

 

I've made it clear I want a refund, Hitachi say that's their decision and they may decide I'm not entitled.

Sasaki are sending an engineer to report on what the problem is, but according to Hitachi this person is going to be able to negotiate as well as maintain/repair the chair, but back to Sasaki and the engineer has no power to negotiate whatsoever.

 

The initial chair was replaced as being not fit for purpose (I was, basically, too big for it at 6ft 2).

The second chair has failed in three areas mechanically. The foot/leg rest will neither raise nor extend and the recliner will no longer bring the chair upright (the foot rest instead of being on the floor is actually 14 inches off the floor, making the chair unusable).

 

Can anyone clear up as to exactly what I'm entitled to, what I can push for and what is supposed to be happening. I was under the impression that as the replacement had not made right the issue (ie the second chair is broken) that I could ask for a full refund and that was that. I know I might be wrong though.

 

Can I just say to Hitachi that I want a refund and that's it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

sadly they are correct

its the retailers decision upon refund/repair/replace

 

 

how long into the original finance did the original chair fail?

 

 

it could be that you cancel the whole finance deal under the CCA act as it was HP?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original issue wasn't failure, it was that the chair simply wasn't fit for purpose..

 

I made clear that I had certain medical issues, as well as my height/weight, before purchase.

 

Sasaki said the chair would be fine (they are manufacturer as well as retailer and I spoke to one of their staff who was supposed to have a nursing/medical qualification of some kind).

 

Within 2 weeks I contacted them to say the chair wasn't right. It was too small in some areas and this meant it couldn't be used to its full/proper extent.

 

I had only signed the finance documents on delivery, two weeks prior to raising this problem, and it was some five or six weeks before the first finance payment was taken.

 

Nov/Dec 13 - purchase and finance agreed

14/2/14 - chair delivery and finance documents signed

End Feb 14 - initial complaint regarding chair

Apr 14 - first payment by DDR on finance

 

I can find exact dates if you need them I think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you first make the finance co aware of any issues

and when did you sign the agreement

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreement signed

Feb 14th 2014

 

Sasaki notified of issues

Feb 28th 2014

 

Finance company first contacted over part 75 claim

April 14th 2014

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I think you should approach the finance company

and get them to cancel the agreement.

 

 

problem solved?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the problem is the finance company.

 

They seem unwilling to listen and I'm not clear on my rights under section 75 - especially as this is a failed replacement.

 

When I made it clear I wanted a refund the response was that it would be their decision and down to retailers comments as well as my own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is working, this is the problem!

 

I have sent this to the finance company as well. They have made no mention of it and are still trying to get me to accept an engineer.

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]56744[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]56745[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

A tape measure hanging over the front of a chair says nothing, you need to say what you are showing and what it is supposed to be.

 

 

Do you have a copy of the original order ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, my bad.. That's how high it is off the floor, its supposed to be flat to the floor as that's the footrest.

 

Copy of the original order? If I knew what you were asking for probably. I have the invoice/sales agreement if that's what you mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Copy of the original order? If I knew what you were asking for probably. I have the invoice/sales agreement if that's what you mean.

 

 

What you actually asked them for

I made clear that I had certain medical issues, as well as my height/weight, before purchase.
Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't make sense.. I asked them on the phone what was the best one, they suggested a model and I bought it. Why would my medical details be on an order? Its not for anything custom or specific to my conditions (although there can be contraindications).

 

Furthermore, they already replaced the unsuitable one with a different model and its the new one that's broken?

 

Don't yell if I'm being daft or missing something. Today has not been a good day with trying to get someone to tell me what my rights are by phone...

 

(This being after calling.... CAB, Finance co, CAB again, Financial services ombudsman, financial services regulator and furniture ombudsman.....)

 

I'm very confused, very stressed and none the wiser

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it was an over the phone sale after looking at their website..

 

 

Further developments:

 

1: Hitachi Finance state I MUST get the retailers permission before getting an independent report - regardless of my claim being under section 75.

 

2: Hitachi state they will abide by an independent report from the furniture ombudsman. They won't, however, tell me which of the two reports they want and instead tell me to just ask the furniture ombudsman (who also don't know what they require).

 

3: The retailer is attempting to force me into accepting a repair. Not only by changing the purpose of their visit from 'inspection' to 'repair' but now by making an appointment without my consent or knowledge to come and make repairs tomorrow.

 

Now what do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god hitachi finance

crap lot

they never know the rules anyway.

 

as this was over the phone

 

you are covered by this.

 

hitachi cannot simply make up their own rules.

 

IMHO you are well within your rights to cancel the whole thing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I really don't understand what it is you've posted in that legal document.

 

I'm in way over my head and there's all these different laws and regulations and it makes no sense at all.

 

Can anyone make it simple as to what I should say to who? Especially with the retailer turning up to try and do this repair and Hitachi not being helpful. I have the feeling they are going to claim I'm being unreasonable now..

 

I just want my money back and for this to go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read from point 29 right to cancel

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how many times I read it, I honestly don't understand it or its meaning or implications.

 

I now feel not only stressed but stupid as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you in email contact with hitachi?

 

 

simple send the PDF to them and refer them to section 29 onwards.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I won't do that unless I know what I'm doing. I can't just take such a thing on trust because I can't respond to any answer they give.

 

What am I asking/telling/showing them, why is it relevant and what does it mean?

 

Not only that, it still doesn't tell me what to do about the retailer who will be at my door in the morning!

Link to post
Share on other sites
No, it was an over the phone sale after looking at their website..

 

 

Further developments:

 

1: Hitachi Finance state I MUST get the retailers permission before getting an independent report - regardless of my claim being under section 75. - no that's wrong.

2: Hitachi state they will abide by an independent report from the furniture ombudsman.

They won't, however, tell me which of the two reports they want

and instead tell me to just ask the furniture ombudsman (who also don't know what they require). - a report from the furniture oms that the new chair Is faulty

3: The retailer is attempting to force me into accepting a repair.

Not only by changing the purpose of their visit from 'inspection' to 'repair'

but now by making an appointment without my consent

or knowledge to come and make repairs tomorrow. - then you refuse them, if they are not there to make an inspection under SOGA

Now what do I do?

 

 

you appears to have hitachi on your side

they simply need an authoritative report that the product they have financed is faulty

 

 

I would then think they might well cancel the whole thing and give you your moneyback and that's the end of your issues.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case which report do I need to supply?

There are two offered by the ombudsman and Hitachi won't tell me which one.

 

A second problem is that Hitachi have stated that they will abide by the report recommendations.

Suppose the report suggested a repair?

 

The way they have put it is that no matter what I want, whatever the report says goes.

I was under the impression that these reports only recommended which of repair or replace was the most cost effective and not that a refund should be offered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the item is within 6mts so you should not have to pay for the report

its the retailers pigeon to either do it

or pay for one to be done by an independent qualified person

 

I don't think it matters where the report comes from.

 

yes it is the retailers call if you are refunded, its repaired or its replaced.

 

outside of 14 days ,from delivery if you read the PDF I sent, you are not automatically entitled to a refund.

 

however as this instance the item is under finance,

so the finance company are equally responsible

 

they might well agree to call the whole thing off as there is a documented history from the past

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have the original agreement

and what does it state with regard to cancelation rights please.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
the item is within 6mts so you should not have to pay for the report

its the retailers pigeon to either do it

or pay for one to be done by an independent qualified person

 

 

I don't think it matters where the report comes from.

 

While technically the item is under six months as it is a replacement item, and the original is over six months, apparently I do have to pay the report because the time does not reset... According to the CAB helpline anyway!

 

yes it is the retailers call if you are refunded, its repaired or its replaced.

 

 

outside of 14 days, if you read the PDF I sent, you are not automatically entitled to a refund.

 

 

however as this instance the item is under finance,

so the finance company are equally responsible

 

 

they might well agree to call the whole thing off as there is a documented history from the past

 

 

You're really confusing me. I thought you'd sent that PDF to show that I could get a refund?

 

Don't I have a choice here? Or are the finance company going to refuse to do anything on the grounds that I'm refusing a repair?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...