Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer Refusing Reasonable Adjustments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I have been suffering from a physical impairment, which occured a little over 12 months ago. I have difficulty walking and suffer chronic pain because of this. I am also having tests for other possible damage to my body, which could have serious consequences for my mobility in the future, if the tests show what the doctors are looking for. Nevertheless, the state I am in now is bad enough and I will be like this for the rest of my life.

 

When this first occured, I was absent from work for 9 days. I could have been absent for longer but felt compelled to get on with things. There was then a period of 5 days and then 1 day a few months later for the same thing. When the pain flares up I simply cannot move without great difficulty.

 

After the last 1 day absence, I was called in for a 'welfare meeting'. However, rather than see how I was doing, like the letter I received stated, it was more of a warning that if I am absent again for this condition I will be subject to disciplinary procedures and I should be looking at it "from their point of view". I was offered no support. They also wrote to my GP, with my permission, and I also received a copy. My GP confirmed everything that I had already told them.

 

I made a Reasonable Adjustment Request, but HR said that I needed to submit a Flexible Working Request, which is not the same thing. I submitted the Flexible Working Request. I was called to a meeting to put my point across. I felt that if I was able to do my job from home during the pain flare-ups, then the company would not lose out and I would not lose out either. My request was denied on the grounds that it would cost the company too much money to provide a laptop and my manager would not be able to monitor me as I work. Why I need to be monitored is anyone's guess.

 

I appealled the decision and said that I was told that this was the only way to make a Reasonable Adjustment Request and they should be looking at it as just that, not a flexible working request. Although, in hindsight, I feel that they may have wanted me to submit it as flexible working for their own purposes. I appealled and was invited to another meeting. This time I felt that the attack on me was harder than the last time. I was told that I should expect to be paid less if I worked some days from home, as I would have no travel expenses. I was also told to take annual leave if I cannot get into work! The company offers 4 weeks paid sickness, of which I have only used 1 day of this year, I do not feel it is right that I have to use my own annual leave if I am unable to get to the office. Again, I asked for support and received none.

 

When the decision came through it was denied, as I knew it was going to be. They said that they do not agree with anything on the doctor's letter to them, nor do they agree with the doctor that I am now disabled. I use a walking aid to get around! Also, it was the same things as before; It would cost the company money and my manager cannot monitor me. the letter also told me that I will be invited to a meeting with HR to discuss my GP notes.

 

I feel that they are setting me up for constructive dismissal, it is really upsetting me and I really don't want to go back into that place. They are making it extremely hard for me. I am trying to come up with solutions and they don't want to know.

 

What can I do?

Edited by theblackkat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to the sporadic nature of your condition i doubt you would be eligible for reasonable adjustments under the equality act. Until you are your employer has little need to do too much, without knowing the condition and the likelihood it may fall under the act (possibly degenerative) then they are legally (morals mean nothing) in the clear with their actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. However, I feel you have missed the point of my post entirely.

 

 

  • I am already disabled, as confirmed by my GP and ACAS.
  • My condition is not "sporadic". I am in chronic pain and my ability to walk diminishes slightly everyday, hence the need for a walking aid. The pain is worse on some days than other, which would force me to stay at home on the days when it becomes excruciating.
  • My employer has openly disagreed with what my GP has told them and made their own mind up. They have committed this in writing.
  • My employer has a paid sickness policy of 4 weeks, which I have used 1 day of this year. However, they are telling me to use my annual leave for sickness.


Something else which I forgot to add in my original post; When the appeal meeting minutes were sent to me, I was asked to sign them or send them back with any amendments. I sent the minutes back with amendments, as they had missed crucial parts of the meeting from it. However, I was not sent the amended notes, I did not sign them to agree to them, they simply ignored it and went ahead with the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of points

- GP cannot decide you are disabled for employment law purposes - only a court can do that. He can offer an opinion though

- I am surprised you have not been refered to occupational health - ask for that now and when you are there ask nosey questions about adjustments

- Does your 4 week sick pay say it is discretionary by any chance?

- How long have you worked there

- Are you in a pension scheme

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so are you saying that I'm not disabled based on what I've said? Regardless of whether you think so or not, the fact remains that I am disabled, I will be like this for the rest of my life and it has a detrimental effect on my daily life.

 

I have not been referred to Occupational Health. I brought it up with HR but they did nothing.

 

It doesn't say it's discretionary.

 

I've been there 2 years.

 

Not in the work pension scheme because it's worthless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am saying that "disabled" in employment law terms is different to that in medical terms, and the only place where it can be determined is at court. It's nothing to do with my opinion, so no need to get chippy about it!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/definition-of-disability-under-equality-act-2010

 

"

Progressive conditions

 

A progressive condition is a condition that gets worse over time. People with progressive conditions can be classed as disabled."

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I think you need to ask, in writing, for an Occupational Health referal.

 

If sick pay is contractual not discretionary it is up to you if you use sick or holiday; if you use holiday it should not count towards attendance procedure trigger points.

 

Join a union.

 

Is there a support group for your condition? If so do they hav information for empoyers and/or a legal helpline?

 

I asked about the pension in case you get ill health retired. but without membership that's academic.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Following up on this. I have contacted ACAS and they have agreed that my condition is now a disability due to suffering for more than 12 months and will be for the rest of my life. ACAS have said that, if the employer has not used someone qualified medically to say that I am not disabled and just gone ahead with disagreeing with it themselves, they are massively in the wrong. I have it in writing from them that they didn't use any medical opinion, just their own.

 

I also have it in writing from my employer that I am now forbidden from taking time off for this medical condition. FORBIDDEN.

 

Funnily enough, they have set up a meeting with occupational health in the coming weeks.

 

According to ACAS, everything my employer is doing is wrong. My case is building.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you follow any of my other advice?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking for an occ health referal in writing.. finding a support group for your condition.. etc.

 

Ok. Looks like you are not seeking advice, just updatnig us? Thank you for that. Do let us know how it goes.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent :) Hopefully they will have some educational materials that might help your employer.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching this with interest. Whilst I can't really add to the advice already provided it does seem that the employer might be setting themselves up for trouble at a later date should this ever end up at a Tribunal. Regrading being 'forbidden' to take time off due to your condition, did you get that in writing? Was it said in a formal meeting with a notetaker present? You could do with a copy of those notes as that could prove damning.

 

On the subject of disability, we talk here in terms of a disability as defined by the Equality Act. This gives specific protection in law, but what is said above is that whilst both you and your doctor BELIEVE that you have such a disability, there are very few conditions where that is automatic and ultimately it could take an Employment Tribunal to determine whether your assertion that you are disabled is true. Naturally a doctor's opinion would almost certainly be taken as sufficient for those purposes, but it may well also involve an independent assessment to concur.

 

The employer does not HAVE to accept the 'reasonable adjustments' that you propose - even with an agreement that you are disabled as defined by the EA - merely that they have 'considered' them. Once again, what is 'reasonable' has no fixed point in law, and it would be down to an Employment Tribunal to decide whether the employer's refusal to a particular adjustment was fair in the light of the work carried out and the cost of that adjustment to implement considering the size and resources of that organisation. A lack of available supervision could be a valid reason not to allow you to work from home, as could the cost of providing a laptop, but the employer might struggle to demonstrate 'reason' if for example they routinely use laptops and could easily configure one for home use (eg to set up a VPN to access the work network) or where other parts of the organisation do allow staff to work from home - that would be almost certainly discriminatory.

 

What an employer should do is to consider ALL reasonable adjustments in order to allow you to attend work and to be productive. This may involve a change of function, allowing you to sit at a workstation instead of stand, a change to seating or the workstation to allow you to work free of pain and without involving movement likely to cause further damage. At the very least, a reasonable employer should set different trigger points for absence associated with the disability. In 'forbidding' disability related absence, or insisting that absence relating to the condition is taken as holiday - where other staff enjoy up to four weeks sickness absence without similar restrictions, this might be the undoing of the employer's case.

 

All of the above does not mean that an employer cannot dismiss somebody in your position - merely that in doing so they must CONSIDER any 'reasonable' adjustment which might allow a person, disabled as classified by the EA, to remain in work. You can still legitimately be dismissed on grounds of capability if you cannot carry out your role, but simply disagreeing with qualified opinion and refusing to at least consider suitable proposals, or putting barriers in place which would not exist for an able-bodied employee could quite easily set the employer up for a rough ride at a Tribunal.

 

So, if they engage OH, or send you for an independent assessment with another doctor, and consider recommendations made by those professionals, and if they genuinely consider what they 'can' do then they would be acting lawfully. If however they give you unreasonable demands, refuse to accept that a condition classifies you as disabled in the face of contrary qualified opinion, and if they flatly refuse to consider 'reasonable' means of allowing you to work, then this is heading towards discrimination and you must keep full and detailed records of what is said and by whom, together with minutes of any meetings. You might just need them later.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact access to work and get them on board, this will have the idiot managers worried sick that an independent assessor is looking at reasonable adjustments, a workplace ergonomic assessment and other issues. Your stress is also being caused by the managers actions, get help from access to work for that also and get it recorded as being down to bullheaded attitude of the dinosaurs that are managing you.

 

May be worth joining a union and also getting some independent legal advice as it appears they are trying to bully you out.

 

That comment about you being forbidden to take sick leave is a classic! Would be great if that is formally recorded somewhere?

 

I am sorry to hear about your disability I suffer from a similar set of symptoms and tried to help out my employer by going in etc! Not a good move on my part as my goodwill backfired when my Ill health retirement question was raised :(

 

I hope it works out for you. The more 'independent' people that get involved the better.

 

Access to work are contacted through the Job Centre

  • Haha 1

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the advice already given.

 

As Emmzzi suggested, join a union.

 

Tribunals now have fees attached to lodge them. Some unions will pay those if the case is strong enough AND be able to help you with legal representation

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...