Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • so what..stuff and all they can do unless you want to be a mug and pay for their xmas staff party by giving them free money   dx
    • They offered w/c 7 Dec on Tuesday of this week.  I didn't accept it or reject it. I just said it was better than Feb but still not what was agreed.  I said I wanted to speak with their director before I would consider it and she refused.  
    • I gathered that after your protests they had come back with the 7th after which you didn't raise any further objection. Is that wrong?
    • NatWest Group’s Q3 results have revealed today the bank provided a peak of 250,000 mortgage payment holidays, but these have since dropped to just 37,000 which are still active View the full article
    • I had quotes and timescales back  in July/August from other companies which will not be valid now.   Ironically the reason I went with this company was because I felt I hit off with the guy that came to see me - the very director that I’m now banned from talking to! Had a very stressful lengthy building insurance claim 2 years ago and this is bringing it all back.  Yes I told them in my email last night that I knew they hadn’t applied to the council and their reply this morning said they use a consultancy who apply to the council on their behalf.  Have just called the council again and they’ve now told me that other people besides them can provide building regs certificates. As they say they haven’t had one applied for and Homeview have said their consultancy deals with the council on their behalf I don’t know what to think.  I’m sure if I ask for a completed date and not a start date she will just say ‘as I said we will start w/c 7 Dec.’    BankFodder have just seen your comment that I’ve done everything by phone. I haven’t and not sure where you’ve got that from?  All has been done via email.  I had two things verbally from the director during his site visit - that it would take two weeks to install and all would be done by Xmas.    Can you explain how I’ve been complicit in the delay? I was expecting the works to be done early Nov and last week was told it would be February which I immediately rejected. I haven’t agreed to any delay?
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Local Authorities chasing council tax debts from 18 years ago !!!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2051 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I am very interested indeed to read this story today on SCOOP concerning Burnley Council who are sending demand notices for alleged council tax dating back to 1997.

 

The article states that with minimum details to back up their claims, home owners, including landlords, are being sent claim notices for the first time and expected to trawl through past records over many years to identify if these claims are still valid.

 

I think that this could be a bigger problem because yesterday, I spoke with a gentleman who has received correspondence at his current address from a bailiff company (no names at present) for a Liability Order that was ISSUED 20 years ago (1995). The debtor moved from the marital home that same year and his ex wife continued to live in the house for 3 years until they divorced in 1998. Yesterday was the first time that he was made aware that a LO had been issued.

 

What is more worrying is that the day before (Wednesday) I spoke with a lady with a similar problem regarding a Liability Order from 1996 (19 years ago). This one being with a different local authority.

 

With both of the above cases, they have received letters from bailiff companies. Interestingly, both letters are not Notice of Enforcements but do state that non payment will lead to a further letter being sent with a fee of £75 being applied and that recovery will be by way of the procedures outlined in Schedule 12 of TCE 2007.

 

http://www.burnleyexpress.net/news/letters/home-owners-receive-council-tax-demand-from-1997-1-7160003

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can of worms BA, the councils are desperate for revenue, so will chance their arm and send out the bailiffs, relying on the fact Council Tax, and indeed Poll Tax is not Statute Barred, so can enforce if they trace. Wonder how many will be a victim of a faulty trace given the age of the debt with Equita, Ross 'n Robbers etc chasing the wrong person?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good response Brassneck and I fear that this problem could get more widespread given that enforcement companies are no doubt happy to take on these 'cold cases' as they could benefit hugely from additional bailiff fees.

 

Such cases need to be looked at very carefully indeed to ascertain what bailiff fees may have been charged pre April 2014.

 

I intend speaking with the LGO on Monday regarding this subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Good response Brassneck and I fear that this problem could get more widespread given that enforcement companies are no doubt happy to take on these 'cold cases' as they could benefit hugely from additional bailiff fees.

 

Such cases need to be looked at very carefully indeed to ascertain what bailiff fees may have been charged pre April 2014.

 

I intend speaking with the LGO on Monday regarding this subject.

 

There needs to be a close look at the whole situation, the dangers of faulty trace are too great given the timespan involved, The bailiffs won't care they are 90% likely to be chasing the wrong J Smith, who may not even have been born when the debt arose. I feel that the enforcers won't look at the persons age when they call, as in Mr Smith the debtor is 45, Mr Smith they traced answering the door is 22, they have found a J Smith to put in the frame so will enforce with extreme prejudice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised to hear of this happening so close to an election period. At the end of next week all local authorities will be in the 'purdah' period and bad publicity about these old debts should be avoided at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I am surprised to hear of this happening so close to an election period. At the end of next week all local authorities will be in the 'purdah' period and bad publicity about these old debts should be avoided at this time.

 

Councils won't care, many councils have inept councillors who believe 100% bovine excrement fed to them by the Council Officers; the election is National Government, no council elections in Wales at least, don't know about England, but might be hoping to keep this low profile, and if challenged say it is their duty to collect no matter how old then debt, Legislation compels them to enforce, not our fault etc etc. One issue is many of these debtors will be dead, so again faulty trace potential.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I forgot to post the following link. Observing the 'purdah' period is vitally important for local authorities and I remembering starting a thread a year or so ago on the subject as one local authority were heavily criticised in the press for allowing their enforcement company to send out letters to debtors during purdah advising them that the council were holding 'debt' clinics where debtors could turn up to discuss their debt problems and work out ways in which to pay their council tax.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdah_(pre-election_period)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A timely warning I think that one should never pay these sort of things in cash but always by a traceable means like a cheque. Then you can go back as far as father time and get proof.

I would think these are a case of we can prove we have an LO but you can't prove if you paid it or not and in some cases it will be because it has not been logged or the paperwork has been lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those links BA, yes these councils could be shooting themselves in the foot, especially if a wrong Mr Smith gets one of these letters during purdah and goes to the press.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

Then the council will say pay up or else.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Then the council will say pay up or else.

 

I think all you can do is to make a complaint in writing to the council, asking them to provide documentation to prove the outstanding liability, including a copy of the liability order granted by Magistrates. Then escalate to the LGO if necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

 

Then the council will say pay up or else.

 

I think all you can do is to make a complaint in writing to the council, asking them to provide documentation to prove the outstanding liability, including a copy of the liability order granted by Magistrates. Then escalate to the LGO if necessary.

 

 

I think it should be for the council to prove unequivocally that a debt is actually owed. I am sure there must be many people who keep paperwork this far back.. but not many I would think !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it should be for the council to prove unequivocally that a debt is actually owed. I am sure there must be many people who keep paperwork this far back.. but not many I would think !

 

There were some cases going back a year or so related to Liverpool council, where it was found that they had no documentary evidence of the tax being still outstanding There were some CAG threads on this and I think the West Liverpool CAB were also involved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were sent one of these demands, one of the first things I'd be doing is sending a SAR to the council to find out exactly on what they are relying. I've moved only once since 1997, twice since 1995 (if I've got my dates correct going back that far). Councils are very good at claiming you owe money, but when challenged cannot always back it up. They are accountable, and must be held to account.

Link to post
Share on other sites
There were some cases going back a year or so related to Liverpool council, where it was found that they had no documentary evidence of the tax being still outstanding There were some CAG threads on this and I think the West Liverpool CAB were also involved.

 

I remember some of those unclebulgaria and if memory serves me correct the Council dropped quite a few when challenged to produce proof of them. Makes you wonder about those who did not protest though.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I remember some of those unclebulgaria and if memory serves me correct the Council dropped quite a few when challenged to produce proof of them. Makes you wonder about those who did not protest though.

This could be a similar scenario as in a fishing expedition with menaces.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...