Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site! Actual Girls [URL=https://matchnow.life]Super casual Dating[/URL]
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Local Authorities chasing council tax debts from 18 years ago !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am very interested indeed to read this story today on SCOOP concerning Burnley Council who are sending demand notices for alleged council tax dating back to 1997.

 

The article states that with minimum details to back up their claims, home owners, including landlords, are being sent claim notices for the first time and expected to trawl through past records over many years to identify if these claims are still valid.

 

I think that this could be a bigger problem because yesterday, I spoke with a gentleman who has received correspondence at his current address from a bailiff company (no names at present) for a Liability Order that was ISSUED 20 years ago (1995). The debtor moved from the marital home that same year and his ex wife continued to live in the house for 3 years until they divorced in 1998. Yesterday was the first time that he was made aware that a LO had been issued.

 

What is more worrying is that the day before (Wednesday) I spoke with a lady with a similar problem regarding a Liability Order from 1996 (19 years ago). This one being with a different local authority.

 

With both of the above cases, they have received letters from bailiff companies. Interestingly, both letters are not Notice of Enforcements but do state that non payment will lead to a further letter being sent with a fee of £75 being applied and that recovery will be by way of the procedures outlined in Schedule 12 of TCE 2007.

 

http://www.burnleyexpress.net/news/letters/home-owners-receive-council-tax-demand-from-1997-1-7160003

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can of worms BA, the councils are desperate for revenue, so will chance their arm and send out the bailiffs, relying on the fact Council Tax, and indeed Poll Tax is not Statute Barred, so can enforce if they trace. Wonder how many will be a victim of a faulty trace given the age of the debt with Equita, Ross 'n Robbers etc chasing the wrong person?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good response Brassneck and I fear that this problem could get more widespread given that enforcement companies are no doubt happy to take on these 'cold cases' as they could benefit hugely from additional bailiff fees.

 

Such cases need to be looked at very carefully indeed to ascertain what bailiff fees may have been charged pre April 2014.

 

I intend speaking with the LGO on Monday regarding this subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good response Brassneck and I fear that this problem could get more widespread given that enforcement companies are no doubt happy to take on these 'cold cases' as they could benefit hugely from additional bailiff fees.

 

Such cases need to be looked at very carefully indeed to ascertain what bailiff fees may have been charged pre April 2014.

 

I intend speaking with the LGO on Monday regarding this subject.

 

There needs to be a close look at the whole situation, the dangers of faulty trace are too great given the timespan involved, The bailiffs won't care they are 90% likely to be chasing the wrong J Smith, who may not even have been born when the debt arose. I feel that the enforcers won't look at the persons age when they call, as in Mr Smith the debtor is 45, Mr Smith they traced answering the door is 22, they have found a J Smith to put in the frame so will enforce with extreme prejudice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised to hear of this happening so close to an election period. At the end of next week all local authorities will be in the 'purdah' period and bad publicity about these old debts should be avoided at this time.

 

Councils won't care, many councils have inept councillors who believe 100% bovine excrement fed to them by the Council Officers; the election is National Government, no council elections in Wales at least, don't know about England, but might be hoping to keep this low profile, and if challenged say it is their duty to collect no matter how old then debt, Legislation compels them to enforce, not our fault etc etc. One issue is many of these debtors will be dead, so again faulty trace potential.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I forgot to post the following link. Observing the 'purdah' period is vitally important for local authorities and I remembering starting a thread a year or so ago on the subject as one local authority were heavily criticised in the press for allowing their enforcement company to send out letters to debtors during purdah advising them that the council were holding 'debt' clinics where debtors could turn up to discuss their debt problems and work out ways in which to pay their council tax.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdah_(pre-election_period)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A timely warning I think that one should never pay these sort of things in cash but always by a traceable means like a cheque. Then you can go back as far as father time and get proof.

I would think these are a case of we can prove we have an LO but you can't prove if you paid it or not and in some cases it will be because it has not been logged or the paperwork has been lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those links BA, yes these councils could be shooting themselves in the foot, especially if a wrong Mr Smith gets one of these letters during purdah and goes to the press.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

Then the council will say pay up or else.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the council will say pay up or else.

 

I think all you can do is to make a complaint in writing to the council, asking them to provide documentation to prove the outstanding liability, including a copy of the liability order granted by Magistrates. Then escalate to the LGO if necessary.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how accurate council records are going back 20 years. They are probably using some old printed reports and have not actually got the original liablilty order paperwork. What if their records are wrong ? Most people don't keep their personal records for more than a year or so.

 

Then the council will say pay up or else.

 

I think all you can do is to make a complaint in writing to the council, asking them to provide documentation to prove the outstanding liability, including a copy of the liability order granted by Magistrates. Then escalate to the LGO if necessary.

 

 

I think it should be for the council to prove unequivocally that a debt is actually owed. I am sure there must be many people who keep paperwork this far back.. but not many I would think !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it should be for the council to prove unequivocally that a debt is actually owed. I am sure there must be many people who keep paperwork this far back.. but not many I would think !

 

There were some cases going back a year or so related to Liverpool council, where it was found that they had no documentary evidence of the tax being still outstanding There were some CAG threads on this and I think the West Liverpool CAB were also involved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were sent one of these demands, one of the first things I'd be doing is sending a SAR to the council to find out exactly on what they are relying. I've moved only once since 1997, twice since 1995 (if I've got my dates correct going back that far). Councils are very good at claiming you owe money, but when challenged cannot always back it up. They are accountable, and must be held to account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were some cases going back a year or so related to Liverpool council, where it was found that they had no documentary evidence of the tax being still outstanding There were some CAG threads on this and I think the West Liverpool CAB were also involved.

 

I remember some of those unclebulgaria and if memory serves me correct the Council dropped quite a few when challenged to produce proof of them. Makes you wonder about those who did not protest though.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember some of those unclebulgaria and if memory serves me correct the Council dropped quite a few when challenged to produce proof of them. Makes you wonder about those who did not protest though.

This could be a similar scenario as in a fishing expedition with menaces.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...