Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help with provident and moorcroft


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i'd taken out loans for 5 years and managed to keep up re-payments.

i then took out another loan, on which i was struggling to pay off, i was then visited by the area manager of provident, tina, who told me i was behind on repayments and i would need to take out another loan to balance the books, or the bailiffs would be calling. i reluctantly agreed. 2 days later brenda the agent turned up. late at night and worse for wear as id been around a friends house, watching football, there she is waving £400 in my face, " this is for you" and we have payed of the balance, after she had filled in the questions herself, even marking me down as the home owner, which i am not and questioned, i signed on the doorstep said good night and went in.

Next morning i realised i now owed not the £600 but £2000 £1000 of it interest i knew nothing about.

I was then made redundant a week before xmas, brenda had stopped turning up to collect, then i received the call from moorcroft

i said the agent hadn't bothered to turn up for months, i was duped into a loan i didn't ask for and told nothing of the interest, least of all being in any fit and proper state to sign anything, they said they'd refer it back to provident. they denied any knowledge of it, said tina had nothing to do with it as brenda's name was on the agreement. i said i'd pay back £1000 but not the interest, there answer was, you have to pay the interest first then the loan.

i now have moorcroft on my back, threatening everything, i no longer live at the address but use it as a care of address, but my ex is now panicking because of the threatening letters, what to do please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & Welcome to CAG,

 

First of all stop talking to Moorcroft on the telephone, the telephone is their preferred method of contact because the person that you speak to is only employed on minimal wage with collection enhancements so will just basically say near enough anything to get a payment out of you.

You need to keep everything in writing so that you have a nice papertrail.

 

The letters from Moorcroft are just threatograms, if you and your ex-partner read the wording carefully, please note the words used are "May" and "If", the letter does not say "Will".

It is just a letter play on words to psychologically panic.

 

Are Moorcroft collecting on Behalf of Provident? They might be as you said they would refer a complaint that you made back to Provident for their instructions.

If Moorcroft are collecting on behalf of Provident then you can safely ignore them, because Moorcroft are not the owner, they have no legal rights.

 

Have a check of your Credit Files as well, Equifax & Experian are the two leaders, both offer free 30 day access but remember to cancel or your card will be charged up to £14.99 per month.

Noddle is free to use but the third of the Credit Reference Companies, Noddle can be either slow to update or lenders do not use them at all.

 

I would also send Moorcroft a CCA request for the Loans, you need to enclose a £1 postal order, they have 12 + 2 working days to comply, the + 2 working days are to allow for postage.

Template Letter link for the CCA Request is here... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974-**Updated-January-2015**

 

If Moorcroft ring you, then refuse to go through DPA questions and just say "In writing only" and hang up, do not go into why, just hang up.

 

Likewise, if anyone turns up, they have no legal powers, in fact the alley cat has more right to be on your property so tell them to leave, if they refuse call the Police and they will remove them on your behalf.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

out of interest, they said if it went to court i couldn't attend, because its not that type of court, i asked what type of court it was then, just where they do paperwork, they said

also i thought you couldn't lend money to someone, already struggling to pay of a loan according to FCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have never heard of Provident taking anyone to Court, this is mainly because of their high interest rates and high charges that Provident add on as well.

 

Did Moorcroft tell you about not being able to attend the Court by any chance?

You can attend Court. If your ever taken to Court and you disagree with it, you sign into the MCOL site and click that you wish to defend, you submit your defence etc. and this is then automatically transferred to your local Court where you can attend.

 

Depending when your loans were taken out, you most likely took them out when it was under the FSA which were quite toothless so Companies could nearly get away with murder in a matter of speaking.

You can make a complaint to the FCA now about your treatment by Provident, but to be honest although the FCA will record the incident and will have sympathy for you, proving that you were under the influence of drink when taking out a loan will be hard to establish.

I am not discrediting your version of events but I am looking at it from the FCA point of view.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

received new letter today

account has been passed onto home collections team, by re establishing contact with our head office by telephone, to arrange affordable payment plan.

we would emphasise that if no satisfactory agreement is made with us you may leave us with no alternative but to recommence collection activity

Link to post
Share on other sites

can my ex stop them arriving at her address

 

Whoever turns up has no right to be on your ex's private property, your ex should tell them to leave, if they refuse then call the Police who will remove them on your ex's behalf.

 

Please note that whoever turns up is self-employed and on a commission only basis, so even if they do leave they will moan about bailiffs this, Court order that, this is only because they have used their fuel & time to then go away empty-handed - oh dear, how sad.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

not really understanding what i need to delete on the letter 77 78 79

 

Provident Loans will come under Section 77 for a fixed loan agreement.

 

Section 77 is for fixed sum loan agreements

Section 78 is for running agreements (Credit Cards)

Section 79 is for Hire Purchase

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
thanks for your help let you know the outcome

 

i have received a statement, at the end, it says no payment and agents name quite a few times, the it says

WRITE OFF MR A. LAZARUS. does this mean the debt has been written off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this mean the debt has been written off

 

If only lol !

 

What this means is that Provident have sold the debt on to a DCA, Provident in turn will offset your negative balance against their tax liabilities.

 

Your Credit File should also reflect this, Provident should reduce the Balance to zero, place a satisfied marker and will also remove the default, the new owner (the DCA) will open a new account on your Credit Reference File, place the negative balance along with the original default date - the original default date must not change!

 

The new DCA will send you two pieces of paper informing notification of transfer of the debt, one piece will be headed by the new owner of the debt, the other from Provident informing you of the sale to the new owner, both are printed off by the new owner of the debt with Providents full permission to use their Company Letter head for this purpose only.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

scrawny little man turned up today and posted a letter

it says he called to discuss acc, surely he should of knocked on the door then as i was there at the time, don't seem to be taking much notice is this really going to work

 

The new DCA will send you two pieces of paper informing notification of transfer of the debt, one piece will be headed by the new owner of the debt, the other from Provident informing you of the sale to the new owner

 

i've had neither

Edited by steve ball
adding
Link to post
Share on other sites

scrawny little man turned up today and posted a letter

it says he called to discuss acc, surely he should of knocked on the door then as i was there at the time, don't seem to be taking much notice is this really going to work

 

The new DCA will send you two pieces of paper informing notification of transfer of the debt, one piece will be headed by the new owner of the debt, the other from Provident informing you of the sale to the new owner

 

i've had neither

 

If the person ever returns to your property, please remember that he has no legal powers, is not a Bailiff and is a self employed Collector on a 20% commission basis.

You do not have to answer any questions or even confirm your name, tell him to leave if he refuses call the Police who will remove him on your behalf.

He will leave with threats of Court and Bailiffs but this is because he is self-employed, wasted his time and fuel for no financial return :-)

 

As you stated previously that you have received a statement with a "Write Off" and a zero balance, this would indicate that the debt has either been sold or is in the pipeline.

You need to check your credit reference files to see who is the owner of the debt, £2 postal order for a paper copy or Equifax and Experian do offer 30 day free access via a debt/credit card but please remember to cancel or your card will be charged £14.99 per month.

Noddle by CallCredit is free but is the third least used credit reference agency so the information is either slow to update or accounts are not showing.

 

Did you ever send the CCA request?

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...