Jump to content



Excel/BW peel centre Stockport PCN : 23/2/15 - now claimform - help


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1339 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Too much for such a brief poc IMHO

Just checking

You did post your 31:14 as well as email it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great so no proof they even got it or ref,d it to this claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure you'll find their letters apply since court claim

they wee sent before the claim..mind

email should be ok

but you need proof you sent it atleast but that's for later

 

 

I don't think your defence is too bad...

but you need to drop the strike out bit.

 

 

i'd add before your numbered point s...

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

1.The claimant has failed to show a cause for action by way of a copy of a contract with the landowner. Following a request made under CPR 31.14. by email dd/mm/yyyy the claimants solicitors have failed to reply to date with any paperwork.

 

 

2.It is not admitted that the Defendant parked in The Peel Centre, Stockport at *******.

The vehicle was never left unattended are therefore not parked.

 

 

3.The claimant has denied me the right to appeal via POPLAlink3.gif.

This matter was raised with the Claimant and denied.

I believe the matter should be referred back to the Ombudsmanlink3.gif as a suitable adjudicator.

 

 

4.If there was a contract, it is denied that the penalty charge is incorporated into the contract.

As per Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 QB 163, the relevant term must be made known before a contract was formed.

Here, the charge was not incorporated into the contract because it was not made clear upon entering the carpark that fees would be occurred even if not leaving the vehicle unattended and that 15mins were allocated to enter and exit there carpark without a ticket.

 

 

5.As per Excel Parking Services Ltd v Martin Cutts, 2011, the signage at the Peel Centre is particularly poor and although there are several signs these are arranged to create ‘entrapment zones’ where signage is not apparent to motorists. There can therefore be no contract through performance.

 

The contract fails information requirements for distance contracts established in the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation And Additional Charges) Regulations 2013. As per the Act, any contract is not binding on the consumer.

 

 

6.The claimant acts as agent for the Peel Centre, collecting monies on their behalf, but does not assume the risk.

As per Fairlie v Fenton, they have no standing to bring any claim.

 

 

7.The case of parkingeyelink3.gif v Beavis in the Supreme Court established that the penalty laws are in play, but that in that specific car park the signage was insufficient to allow the motorist to make an informed decision. In this car park, the signage is of such poor quality that the charge of £100 is a penalty and an unfair consumer term.

Additionally, any monies over the £100 are not allowed by the Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 and are an attempt to artificially boost the claim in an attempt to get around the costs limits in small claimslink3.gif cases.

 

 

 

...................

 

 

only my try

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so post 100 then was it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Still waiting on a response from MCOL (they have received my defence)

 

 

got a letter today from Excel Saying that my details have now been passed on to their Debt recovery team and will not acknowledge any further correspondence - any ideas what this means - signed by their litigation department

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a lot of bluster to scare you into paying.

If you waited until your deadline to file your defence, it can't be long until their deadline for the case to be stayed. I don't remember all the timescales, but others will remind us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

other have had the same letter too

just file it

it could be useful.

 

 

next move is theirs and the court will inform you by notice of allocation if they wish this to progress

 

 

they have 28 days from the filing of your defence to do 'something'

else it gets auto stayed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Look at posts today from Eric on the BW claim threads today

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore BW, only fill in court forms.

 

You can get your own and print off from web if need be.

 

N180 is easy,

no to mediation and the others are self explanatory.

 

allocation will be to your local court anyway so only name court if you want one near to work for example.

 

They may well go for a paper hearing via a N159,

if you get a copy of that just refuse such a request and say you wnat a proper hearing.

 

Court may well refuse paper hearing anyway if recent events are anything to go by as Gladdys seem to have been rumbled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

all forms are in the legal section of our library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s -  would collapse overnight.

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs - that's why they will never tell you they are not bailiffs and have absolutely zero legal powers on any debt.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...