Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • are you defo sure with the wrong name it can be put on my car but not end up with a v5 thats assign to the private plate with arnold when im not that name
    • its called reading up.................... they have 28days to do 'something'  though with court delays that can be 2mts before you might be able to guess its become autostayed. dx    
    • surely it should not matter.  as long as a driver is insured to driver the car. the V5C RK name does not have to match . then you can take as long as it takes. 
    • Today I received a MCOL  claim notification haven't been able to log on to see what he put in the claim He has failed to provide information required  pre action I have not received bill or details of what the other builder has done I have not received a letter before action  I had a verbal request to pay half of the new builders re-work  cost  I received an email stating if I didn't pay within 72 hours he would make a claim against me in the county court I did offer to pay £300 for the snagging which in my opinion was sufficient to cover any labour or materials on the minor items He went ahead and re worked the whole of the bathroom area without discussing it with me He has made a claim for £2400 He had taken it upon himself to carry out all of the works without recourse or discussion with me, other than an email saying he wasn't happy with some of the finish surrounding a curved wall and an extractor duct he stated he had lost confidence in me and had appointed someone else to carry out the work The original cost of the full garage conversion was £10400, building control were fully involved and passed all inspections I quoted in writing detailing the work I would carry out with a single price for the whole job no photos of the finished job he has taken lots of photos and videos but not shared them with me onlymeagain  
    • Evening All I am now working on pulling together my bundle of docs for Court (it needs to be submitted by 8 July) and have three parts I'd be most grateful for your thoughts on please. The first is a time line / case summary, the second concerns Items Not In Dispute and the third (I hope) sets out where P2Gs insistence that they are only liable for the first £20 of any claim falls foul of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and also cites three cases where different judges found against P2G and ParcelHero Ltd when they attempted to argue their very limited liabilty was warranted. Anonymised pdfs of all three sections are attached. Given that in their Defendant's Response P2G appear to have conceeded that the eventually delivered parcel was empty, and that the contents had not been handled with due care and attention, do I need the amount of detail I have included in the summary document, or do you consider a significantly shortened version would suffice? As ever, many thanks g59 Description of unenfoceable insurance requirements for my bundle.pdf Issues Not In Dispute - anonymised.pdf P2G Timeline and case summary - anonymised.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Deduction of money for Lunch Break not taken


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Someone who works for a well known supermarket (think of the colour green) as a delivery driver (for over 2 years) has been having an hour's lunch break deducted from their wages, even though the said lunch is never taken...All this has just come to light recently.

 

Ordinarily if you work in store you have the option to 'skip break' on the clocking machine but being out on the road all the time means they are not in store to do this. The supermarket's internal electronic timing system will automatically deduct a one hour's break if you have been clocked in over a certain amount of time.

 

THe point is, they believe this has happened well over 100 times since they started. Delivery drivers, at least at the store where they work, do not get a lunch break. So what would be the way forward to claim this money back? Even at £7 ph , it's nearly £1000 they are 'owed'. They have tried internal through the management team and HR but they are just simply ignored.

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should be... sounds like it will ony be resolved as a group.

 

Or they could start taking the lunch hours.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just seen asked a van driver for the same company about this. He has read his contract and he tells me that I says in there that it is his responsibility to take his lunch break. Basically saying he will be billed for his lunch break whether he takes it or not while he is out on the road. He does not have to clock in like floor staff. I'm getting this in texts so would need to see contract for myself to confirm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HE does have to clock in and out for his shifts.

 

On the clock machine there is a skip meal break.

 

Make sure the correct meal break is selected for the time you are trying to "skip it"

 

This can be done at the end of the shift.

 

This would generate something on an hours exception report that gets signed by Section leader or above on a daily basis authorizing or rejecting the exception.

 

He and his colleagues if they were looking for a union should approach GMB as they are the ones with the recognition agreement.

 

This situation if it has been ignored would be better suited to a formal grievance, single or collective.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt there is any legs in this one.

 

They set a lunch break the driver will be deemed to have taken it, this is unless tacho's are involved where the employer should see the issue (dependant on driving hours worked per shift).

 

Asking for back pay won't get him anywhere i suspect as they will say "we were not aware, why have you not been taking your breaks"

 

The argument is only valid where it can be shown that the work is physically impossible to complete without working through lunch. That is what needs to be raised before anything else.

 

If the words job and knock, task and finish are also involved then give it up now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately with driving jobs, it's very common for employees to be responsible for taking their own breaks. The only way there would be any recourse would be if they were actively stopped from taking them - for example, if their delivery sheets were handed to them in the morning with delivery slots throughout the day that would be impossible to make if they took a lunch break.

 

Even if that was the case, I'm sure that if the drivers all downed tools for an hour every day, with all the subsequent delivery slots being late (and several angry customers) the drivers would be able to point out why they were late and the company may take action to factor in breaks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On most runs there is not a 1hr gap scheduled in. That is correct. Normally there is a 30 mins scheduled into the runs that keep the driver away from the store the entire shift. for the shifts where 2 vanloads are taken out, there is normally a 30 min gap between them, either added onto the travel time from the last drop back to base or before you go out.

 

Problem is that that requires all routes being put on the correct van. Routes are assigned to a specific van throughout the day. So van 1 may be route 1, route 12, route 20 and route 26. The 2 x 30 min breaks for the entire day (1 for each driver) will be shedulled among those routes. However sometimes the routes get moved onto different vans when assigned. These 30 min breaks are what keeps the company legal within the WTD as 20mins is in fact the legal minimum for the shifts worked.

 

As for the 1 hour, the company procedures in place allow you to skip the 1 hour lunch break if you did not take it, allowing you to be paid for it. Simply skip the meal break before you clock out when you go home... This means the "if the route makes it impossible to have the 1 hour lunch break....advise given above is not relevant.

 

To summarise

 

1 hour is automatically taken off for lunch break

All employees have to clock in and out.

If the lunch break has been missed, employee has to "Skip meal break" on the clocking machine. This is then authorized by the manager to allow payment.

Employee would of been told to do this in induction.

As contracted driver shifts are normally 8-9 hours, legal break entitlement is only 20 mins

 

For others info.

 

Vans are drivable on a car license and therefore outside Tacho regulations.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking with my pedant hat firmly stuck on here (but also out of genuine interest as you obviously have local knowledge) :)

 

1. Are you not then saying they follow the WTR when it suits but they are also able to ignore them for the clocking of breaks part (there is a small line in the WT regs around not using end of day as the break but from memory it may be a should not a shall and in the guidance not regs) - under the assumption your saying not even the 20 min part is deducted.

2. My now small and quickly evaporating memory of tacho requirements is the weight of the vehicle not the license type being the key (e.g. according to my daughter i'm an old man so i can and have driven up to 7.5 where as the young ones amongst us need an additional element)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies

 

Howvever (and this may be a local problem) , if they have been clocked in for a certain amount of time, the clocking in machine does not allow the option to skip break, it says ' Punch Window rejected' and does not allow said meal break to be skipped.

 

In addition to them taking all this money (I thought unlawfully), the store will clock them out for 30 minutes whilst they are out on the road working / driving and delivering! This is the only time (30 mins) that gets built into their daily run- an hour's break is NOT built into their run.

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF the driver is using a tachograph, analogue ( now probably all phased out) or digital, using a mandatory card they are required to comply with the drivers hours laws and regulations, no ifs or buts But probably these vans are non digi tacho but how about requirements of WTD ie 6 hours then a mandatory break? Also as mobile workers I don't think they can "0pt out " of the disregard for working hours?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies

 

Howvever (and this may be a local problem) , if they have been clocked in for a certain amount of time, the clocking in machine does not allow the option to skip break, it says ' Punch Window rejected' and does not allow said meal break to be skipped.

 

In addition to them taking all this money (I thought unlawfully), the store will clock them out for 30 minutes whilst they are out on the road working / driving and delivering! This is the only time (30 mins) that gets built into their daily run- an hour's break is NOT built into their run.

 

If the punch window is rejected, use the break for the next window. Eg if trying to skip lunch and miss that punch window, tell it to skip supper.

 

The 30 min break is factored into ALL long wave runs (Where wave 1 and wave 2 are on the same load and where 3 and 4 are on the same load.

 

Between waves that are not split, there is 45mins from return to base and depart for next wave, During this time a LOADER should be loading the next wave,

 

As for WTD, no single wave lasts more than 5 hours

 

Vans are nto tachod and do not need to be so drivers regulations do not apply.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IN all fairness though the 1 hour lunch break thing is a pain in the ass and outdated, they should get rid of ti from the system :D

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

Leeds Head Office got involved and they have reviewed everything from past two years and have agreed to give back ALL of money deducted for all of the times it has happened...Success!

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear :) When you get repaid let us know so we can change title thread to**Resolved successfully**

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...