Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advantage gold fee


stoppaRed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm going through a claim with my sister. ( I am claiming against HSBC) She has an Advantage Gold account which she pays £12.00 fee per month. ( It is supposed to give better benefits) The problem is, they include this fee ( which is non reclaimable) with unauthorised overdraft fee. How do I find where it is or do I just deduct £12.00 off the charges each month?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat West changed their policy several months ago and like you say don't state the fee on statements. Not sure if you should just deduct £12 each month though as there have been several increases in this fee over the past few years and you would therefore be deducting too much in some cases. Might be worth checking with Nat West on what dates their Advantage Gold fees increased and then you can work back from there.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I make out the charges are:

from

Oct 2002 £6.00

Sept 2003 £9

July 2005 £10

June 2006 £12.

 

So do I put all cherges into the s/sheet and then pick one paid referral fee each month and deduct the above charges according to the year? or do I input everything and deduct the charges at the end? or do I just ignore it and hope the claim goes through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I make out the charges are:

from

Oct 2002 £6.00

Sept 2003 £9

July 2005 £10

June 2006 £12.

 

So do I put all cherges into the s/sheet and then pick one paid referral fee each month and deduct the above charges according to the year? or do I input everything and deduct the charges at the end? or do I just ignore it and hope the claim goes through?

 

At the end of the month or charging period they will have something like charges entered and take off the correct amount from each month. The spreadsheet ahs to be accurate.

  • Confused 1

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advantage gold thread, is one that you can work out very easily, it is idiot proof, I'm the idiot that wrote it!! Does she still have the advantage gold account? It is a good account unless she doesn't use the benefits which would make it a burden on her rather than a benefit. Good Luck to your sister.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My sister has 464 statements. Does she really have to photocopy all these and send them to the court and the solicitors in the bundle?

What exactly do I send to the court? all the files in the bundle on this site? I thought that seemed a lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

My sister has 464 statements. Does she really have to photocopy all these and send them to the court and the solicitors in the bundle?

What exactly do I send to the court? all the files that are in the bundle on this site? I thought that seemed a lot. Could someone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are charges from her account. I have written to NW asking for details of when she started/finished the account, as the statements still said gold account on them even when she hadn't. I have had no reply after 2 weeks, do they not have to reply to me?

 

up to 30/9/02 the statement said unarranged borr. fee £ 14.00

then from 30/10 02 it started to say A/C XXXXX £14.00 ( OK so far) as I assume the description had now changed.

 

but then 31/12 02 it was A/C XXXX 11.42 (with adv gold on the statement)

31/1/03 A/C xxxxxx £20.00 ( so now I assume this is UAB fee £14 + £6 Gold??

31/2/03 Same as above

31/3/03 Same as above

 

Then

30/4/03 A/C xxxxxxx £ £5.82 ( Listed as charges and Adv gold printed on the statement

30/5/03 A/C xxxxxx £ 7.50 listed as charges

30/6/03 A/C xxxxxx £ 21.50 ( I assume 14 uaf + 7.50 gold?)

30/7/03 Same as above

then

31/10/03 A/C xxxxxxx £ 27.50

then

30/6/04 A/C xxxxx £9.00 ) assume that the gold fee is now £9)

then

30/12/04 A/C xxxxxx £37.00

31/1/05 A/C xxxxxxxxx £9.00

28/2/06 A/C xxxxxx £28

 

Can someone help on this please? It doesn't seem to tally up with the sticky guide. I am 2 weeks late through waiting for a reply from NW

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have written a thread on the NatWest forum called advantage Gold and Unarranged borrowing which explains everything so that you make it easy for you to work out. It is idiot proof as I am the idiot that wrote it!!

Hope it helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read last comment that is doesn;t tally with the guide, when it is absolutely 100% is within the guide so I will go down each and every charge and explain what is and is not there. First of all the rounded up figures.

31/1/03 and following 2 items you are right adgd with unarranged Borrowing

I do have a suspicion that some people were on an advantage gold trial of newer benefits for £7.50, (I have asked someone on here who had the same question to look into it for me a few months ago but as yet have not had a response). I will edit the ADGD thread as a result of your post and the previous post. SO thank you for listing this charge

30/12/04 by now advantage gold was £9 and £28 was unarranged borrowing.

I hope that helps and I will edit the ADGD thread accordingly.

the charge of £11.42 would only partially be ADGD maybe interest is the rest of it.

the 20.04.03 is a partial adgd charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Natwest. I assume that 31/10/03 A/C xxxxxxx £ 27.50 is £20.00 un o/draft fee and £7.50 is ADGd fee. Then it changes to 28 + 9

Is that correct?

I don't want to send the wrong figures in. Does it matter if I am alittle out on the actual sum,?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Charges as follows ( UAB + ADV Gold)

april 2003 A/C XXXX £20 ( 14 UAB + 6adgd)

AUG 2003 A/C XXX £26 ( IS THAT 14 UAB + 12 ADGD?)

SEPT 2003 £29 ( WHAT'S THE BREAKDOWN HERE?)

OCT £9.00

nOV £29

aM i RIGHT IN ASSUMING THEN THAT IN aUG IT WAS AS i SAID ABOVE AND IN sEPT/nOV IT WAS £20 UAB + 39 ADGD?

AND IN OCT JUST ADGD?

Link to post
Share on other sites

stoppared no aug 2003 is Uab £20 + 6 ADGD

sept 2003 UAB £20 + £9 adgd

Nov £20 uab and 9 adgd

October yes have you seen the thread on the stickie Advantage Gold and Unarranged Borrowing a guide. I will take a look and confirm that the figures are correct but the October ones are right

 

Had a look back on that above mentioned thread and the figures I have quoted are correct

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...