Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In your very first post of this thread you said:

 

I failed my medical and tribunal last year, My original medical was 9th of July 2014 and decision 23rd July. My tribunal was 26 november 2014.

 

You would now have been eligible to re-apply for ESA using the same criteria as it is now six months after that assessment date.

 

However, the assessment did not go in your favour and you asked for a Mandatory Reconsideration (MR). Instead of waiting for the outcome of the MR you put in a fresh claim using a different criteria and not even mentioning the criteria upon which you based your first claim despite the fact that your first claim was at that time still active and under reconsideration.

 

If, as you say, there was no mention of the asthma on your first sick note but you made them aware of it during the assessment, then they should have considered that when allocating points to the descriptors. Can you show and prove with medical evidence where asthma of itself would have made a difference to the scores? Did you point this out when you asked for MR?

 

Can't you see that by your own actions you automatically cancelled your first claim before giving them the opportunity to reconsider it by informing them of such a change in your circumstance that the circumstances upon which you previously claimed ESA to all intent and purposes since you did not mention them, no longer existed.

 

I know it is generally accepted here that DWP staff are stupid but they would have to be total dummies to let pass such an own goal and so obvious an attempt to pull a fast one.

 

The decision on your last claim would have been given in the MR since they had said claim before MR decision was made and conveyed to you.

 

On that basis I would suggest that they are right in asserting that you can't legally submit another claim using the same criteria until 6 months after decision on the claim was made, and that was, as you say, 15 August.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well DM called me today saying my claim was accepted as a worsening condition for some reason back to the 6th of february. So not sure what happened now.

 

But either way im back on ESA and what a relief it has been...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I called DWP to get my payment details changed to my post office account, I called on the 11th of march, payments are released on fridays for wednesday payments so plenty of time.

 

The only problem is the company i had my benefits paid into were closing and on the 9th suddenly advised all customers to remove funds before the 13 other wise you wont get access, It's basically a prepaid visa debt card and the money is paid into a collections accounts and the company allocate the funds to the visa debt card account.

 

So anyway DWP made a mistake and send the payment due on the 18th to the old visa debt card account. Anyway i got a call from some rude woman at DWP saying you never called to change any details we have no record.

 

Anyway i called ESA again and they told me they did get a call from me on the 11th because i know i called and done it in plenty of time. So basically there £113 sitting in a natwest holding account because thats the bank the prepaid visa debt card used.

 

So DWP admitted they made a mistake and reissued the payment to the post office. Will DWP recover those funds or will they remain where they are, i dont have access to them.

 

But in the end i got my money and DWP messed up and repaid me. But was just curious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One would hope that the DWP recover the money from the Natwest account seeing as it was their mistake. But just to cover yourself, I'd suggest getting in writing that the DWP made the mistake.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do, They could see my new payment details on the system or that i did request them to be changed, So someone at DWP has made a problem.

 

I got a new payment issued, So all is good. I know it's tax payers money but DWP can go whistle if they think im going to chase around companies to get it back. I told them in plenty of time.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP will not ask you to recover the funds on their behalf, no. They issued you a new payment, so they're obviously satisfied that you don't have the money and that the mistake was theirs. There is a department within the DWP that deals with these sorts of issues (that is, recovering payments that have gone missing) but it may not be worth the trouble for such a small (to them) amount of money.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

So today, My council offered me a flat £70.59 per week. Which is fine.

 

But on the 30th of July I have my ESA medical, And I don't know if ill pass or fail and im worried, So if I make a claim for housing benefit with ESA, and my ESA claim gets closed because of a failed medical, How would that effect my claim, if i made a JSA claim then appealed ESA?

 

Quite worried now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you fail the medical then the best thing would be to ring the council and let them know what has happened and that you will be claiming jsa whilst appealing the esa situation. You would still be entitled to housing benefit and council tax relief whilst claiming jsa.

 

From my experience a phone call to the council as soon as anything happens always keeps them in the loop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you fail the medical then the best thing would be to ring the council and let them know what has happened and that you will be claiming jsa whilst appealing the esa situation. You would still be entitled to housing benefit and council tax relief whilst claiming jsa.

 

From my experience a phone call to the council as soon as anything happens always keeps them in the loop.

 

Yes, pretty much this. If you ESA stops then the DWP will probably inform the council of this fact and the council may stop your HB. So as a matter of urgency and pretty much before doing anything else, contact the council and tell them that you wish to continue your HB claim on the basis of "nil income" until you get things sorted out. Once you make a JSA claim you need to inform the council again, and after that (if you choose to appeal against your ESA decision and move back onto ESA while waiting for the appeal to be heard) then you should inform the council of this as well.

 

It is a pain, but councils don't generally want you to end up homeless so keep them informed of everything that happens.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I recently applied for PIP and sent evidence etc with my claim, I called ATOS today and they basically told me they have enough information that I wont need to go for a face to face assessment.

 

Can someone advise me what this normally means for my claim status.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats on no face to face, always to be avoided if possible.

 

I'm not sure if there would still be a report as such as there was no face to face assessment, but it might be worth asking for it if it does exist, if only so you have a copy since DWP seem to be so efficient at losing/destroying anything that might be of help to the claimant in the future.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats on no face to face, always to be avoided if possible.

 

I'm not sure if there would still be a report as such as there was no face to face assessment, but it might be worth asking for it if it does exist, if only so you have a copy since DWP seem to be so efficient at losing/destroying anything that might be of help to the claimant in the future.

 

Yeah ill call DWP tomorrow and see if they have it.

 

Apparently my PIP claim is until 2020.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pcombo - pleased for you - 2020 is quite a long award - out of interest, how long ago did you apply as the DWP state the turnaround is quicker these days

 

i originally applied in April 2013, did not get a decision until April/May 2014 - so took about 13 months, though did get higher rate living component - my award was for 3 years so up until April 2016 - you should be aware that they normally commence a review about 12 months before the end of your award - my review started in May/June this year and finally had my assessment last week - am dreading the outcome

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I applied on the first week of September, ATOS sent a report to DWP on the 13th october, And was awarded PIP on 20th.

 

So quite fast and no face to face assessment.

 

I'm quite happy with the outcome.

 

Hope your outcome is good :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I counted my points received on the descriptors on the award letter, It said I got 11 points for daily living component so was on standard,

 

But I counted all the points for this and counted 22.

 

Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming you mean that you think you should have got 22, not that you got 22 and DWP reduced it to 11. Ask for a mandatory reconsideration in writing, listing where you believe you should have scored additional points and why, e.g. I believe I should get 4 points for this descriptor because xxxxx. You should be aware that there is always a possibility that the award will be reduced (to nothing) instead of increased. If you're confident you could also phone to ask/provide the information over the phone, however this does mean you have less chance to make sure you get all your points across - no pun intended!

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I counted the scores they gave me for each descriptor, I reached 22 counting the scores they gave me.

 

But it says I only got 11 points, Even though the points giving add up to 22.

 

I submitted evidence, Like 2 gp letters, and ESA report along with a mental health report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the letter again, It seems the descriptors are duplicated, Not sure why. Kinda complicated things,

 

I think it is correct that I did score 11 points.

 

Either way I'm still happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you only need one more point to get the enhanced rate, I'd be looking at those point scores very, very carefully to see if you can find just one more that would make such a difference to the amount you get.

 

As an aside, as you got an odd number of points you must have either got the 1 point for needing an aid to take medication or 3 points for needing help to get in the bath or shower as they are the only odd numbered points available. This means that someone who forgets to take their life saving medication without an aid effectively scores nothing unless they also need help getting in the bath or shower because that 1 point can never make the difference between getting or not getting an award by itself. To me, that seems very wrong but then probably the people who devised these scores aren't going to die if they forget their pills so it's not important to them.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DWP sent me a form saying I could be entitled to SDP.

 

Does this just get added to my ESA claim, And will the SDP be backdated to the start of my PIP claim I believe it is?

 

And how much is SDP?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...