Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with N244?


mugwump99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi CAG,

I realise I am leaving it a bit late but can anyone check my attached witness statement which I am hoping to take to court tomorrow with my N244?

I have blacked out my name and other details for obvious reasons.

Edited by mugwump99
Attempted to replace attachment - unable to do so.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please remove all identifiable data from your upload....upload unapproved.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did black out the relevant details on my first attachment however here is a new attachment with all details replaced with === (PDF format)

 

Your statement is poorly laid out - re-type it and add a number for each new paragraph.

 

Did you apply to set aside the possession order - because if not your second 'reason' for your application is invalid.

 

Your argument about a 'lawful contract' is seriously flawed. Even if there wasn't a signed contract, the loan would be equitable. Is there a charge on the property - one presumes so since a possession order was granted. Suggestion: remove this statement - it's not one you can argue in a court of law.

 

You then change tack with reference to CICB interest rates and GEM interest rates - the two, according to the other information you have, are two different things - so why are you comparing them? If you want a judge to understand, you'll have to explain it better and point to exactly what it is you think is wrong and why.

 

The loans referred to as A, B, C - did you have any further advances, is one for commission, is one interest based? You don't provide enough information - so how will the judge know what you are talking about? When the PO was granted - what was the money judgment amount for? That will give you a clue as to whether the amounts claimed are similar or close to the loan amount you think you had, and the loan amount detailed in the ABC figures.

 

Have you cleared the funds? You state you can by end Jan 2015, it's mid February. No point in telling the judge you can clear them when you haven't done so - even if you are still in discussions about how much is owed, there is nothing stopping you from paying what you THINK is owed.

 

The solicitors costs are contractual and will be in the terms and conditions provided to you - the judge won't be interested and has no jurisdiction over them. Which is why, with mortgage possession cases, judges never award costs; they're contractual, the judge doesn't have to order them because the mortgagee is entitled to them. You can challenge them if you believe them to be too high or unreasonable, but frankly, £800 for possession proceedings seems about right to me.

 

Is the loan term over? You state GEM won't lose out - but if the loan term is over, the court has no jurisdiction, so whether you're paying monthly or not, the court can't do anything in relation to that. The sale of the property would probably mean the judge could order a stay whilst the sale was progressed.

 

If the loan term isn't over, then you are far better having a discussion with the judge about clearing the outstanding balance in the remaining term of the loan by upping payments (i.e. a Norgan compliant offer).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lea,

You probably remember my earlier posts - this has dragged on and we have been unable to raise the stated balance but we still have cash buyers as a last resort.

To answer your points we didn't know we could ask for a set-aside (Isn't that the purpose of an N244?) we have asked soliciors, cab, forum's, etc. and been given very little advice of any value.

There is a charge on the property.

Interest Rates: We have queried this many times with GEM and their answers are completely baffling!

They incorrectly stated we were on a fixed rate, then apologised and said we were on a variable rate, however they have fixed the rate at 8.44% since 2009 whilst their base rate has been 4%.

I mention their reply in my statement were they refer to CIBC's rate.

Loans A,B,C - as I said I have sent a request to GEM for additional info under the SAR as they have provided no proof of an agreement.

As far as I'm aware there was no 'money judgement' the judge just said we were in breach of contract as the term had expired and he had no option.

I didn't state I have cleared the funds, I said if they only had a claim on the original £48k (Which is the only account they have produced docs for) my spreadsheet shows we have paid £31k even at 8.44%, which would leave an oustanding balance of approx. £31.4k according to GEM's statement dated 30th Jan 2015 furthermore if the interest rate should be 4.5% instead of 8.44% that balance reduces to £27.1k - We can probably raise this amount via a personal loan.

Solicitors costs: GEM have added 5 amounts without notifying us (Only notified £240-00) and I believe they are accruing interest which I have been told they cannot do.

The loan term expired Jan 2012 which is why we were told we were in breach of contract. My point that GEM won't lose out is that we have paid over £58k since GEM took over our mortgage in 2004 and we are still paying 8.44% plus 33% extra per month so they are hardly out of pocket!

I'm afraid your reply has just dashed any hopes I had and I'm back to square one.....mugwump 99

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't remember.

 

An N244 can be used to apply for a set aside or to stay a warrant. But you have to state what you want on it. In this instance, there's no point in you applying for a set aside, the PO was validly granted. The reason you have received 'very little advice of any value' is largely because there is no advice to give you that will help you because your mortgage term is over.

 

Solicitors costs, whilst unpaid, can incur interest. It's just another outstanding debt. Your terms and conditions will undoubtedly refer to their contractual right to interest on any sums outstanding.

 

You have had an additional three years past your loan term to resolve this (i.e. by selling or remortgaging) and for some reason appear to prefer the unhelpful (at this stage) activity of chasing your tail (trying to argue points that no longer have any validity - e.g. the interest rates).

 

GEM won't lose out because they have a possession order. Your option is to sell and ask the court for time to do that rather than allow possession - but beyond that, there's not a lot a court can do for you at this stage.

 

Far better to get accurate advice than to waste your time on something that won't work and which will ultimately dash your hopes anyway.

 

You said you had cash buyers - get selling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...