Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Whistleblowing resulting in my not working (garden leave)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm a company director (no shares), and discovered late last year that the MD and majority shareholder were committing fraud (fraudulent invoices from ghost employees, tax evasion) for financial gain. Over teh Christmas break I grabbed all the books and now have concrete evidence.

 

I have notified the police who advised me to call the HMRC hotline - this was done back on 29/12/14 and I'm still waiting to hear back from them.

 

Returning to work on Jan 5th, I confronted the MD and shareholder, and they put me on garden leave. A letter from their solicitor the following day confirmed this pending an investigation into believed gross misconduct (this is totally fabricated).

 

The company is very small - a total of 4 employees including myself - and I'm still on garden leave, with the last solicitor's letter saying they should be ready for the disciplinary hearing in about 3 weeks.

 

Is this acceptable or should I be getting my solicitor to gee them up a bit, maybe starting an employment tribunal process?

 

This company has been running for 3 years, the previous company (same customers and service) for 20 years - I have been an employee for that long. As I'm now 46, I feel the chances of me getting back into this trade are getting less and less as time goes on.

 

Any advice is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im guessing they are going to try a couple of things

 

1) Bringing the company into disrepute

2) Breaching company Confidentiality.

3) Breach of mutual trust and confidence.

 

Until you get a letter with the reasons for suspension and/disciplinary there is not much to do.

 

WHEN you do get called to a meeting, if you have access to a union rep make sure you take them (Disaplinary only unless company has an agreement)

Read ALL NOTES carefully

Ask for additions and edits if the notes to not reflect the main points said.

Only sign the notes when they reflect the main points

IF they refuse write and sign "Under Duress"

Make sure in the meeting before it is closed (And therefore added to the minutes) how you will be provided and when, a copy of the notes.

 

Also remember if not a union rep, you are entitled to be accompanied to disciplinary meetings by a colleague. Make sure you take advantage of this!

 

If you feel yourself loosing control of your emotions, demand a 5 minute adjournment. If it is refused, make sure the request and refusal is recorded in the notes.

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

Despite reading many, many web pages, I'm still unclear as to who a companion can be (I'm not a member of a union). Ideally, I'd like to take someone I have done small amounts of work for in the past (this is completely unrelated to my employer) - they have actually chaired disciplinary hearings and would have a very good idea of how things should be done.

 

I guess I should advise my employer who I'd like to be accompanying me as soon as I get the notification and play it from there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your legal right is to- a collegue at the same organisation- a union rep (doesn;t have to be your union)Anyone else can be refused by the organisation

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother,

 

Only myself and the managing director - of those, only I am not involved in the fraud...

 

Shareholders hold 80, 10 and 10 per cent each (MD holds 10%) - I don't believe the other shareholder is involved, certainly doesn't know the extent of the fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: Just checked my company email address, and it is no longer valid so it would seem I've been deleted from the company mail server...all this and I've not had the disciplinary hearing yet.

 

Does this mean I can push forward with an unfair dismissal claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then it is down to the shareholders to dismiss or otherwise. Speak to them and tell them that they are the ones who will go to gaol if fraud is proven. Companies house will certainly have a view on this but they have no investigatory powers. However, they can apply sanctions.

Certainly an unfair dismissal is on the cards becuase they cannot claim that it is a breach of confidence becuase you are obliged by law to report a crime when you know about it. That trumps any obligation to your employer. As you have a solicitor I would be instructing him/her to go for the jugular and in a public a way as possible. It might not save your job but it will adjust their attitude enormously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the length of time you have worked there, I think you should speak to an employment solicitor. It sounds like there is a high chance of this ending up in a Employment Tribunal.

 

I personally would go through the motions and attend the disciplinary hearings; making sure that my position and concerns are properly documented in the minutes. If you don't co-operate with the investigation it would look bad in an unfair dismissal case. At the same time you should probably be preparing yourself for Tribunal if you are dismissed.

 

Your position as company Director and employment as a Director are slightly different things. You can be suspended as an employee even though the shareholder has not formally passed a resolution to remove you from the company Director position yet.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...