Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay so potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cashminder


Mr Worried
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have a joint cash-minder acc and banking has been sporadic over last few month re change of jobs etc. missus becoming unemployed.

 

Co-op wrote saying you don't have an overdraft etc and if your current account conducts itself without sufficient funds then we will close account.

 

Then they fine me £15.00 per item

 

So do I react and explain again and outline the circumstances behind the running of acc. or do I ask them why yhey threaten me then take £15.00 a pop?

 

Mr

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a basic account? Have they permitted an overspend - or simply blocked payments and levied charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a basic account? Have they permitted an overspend - or simply blocked payments and levied charges

 

Yes Cash minder is a basic account, they have not authorized od. they block payments if insufficient funds and then charge me £15 per item.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I think that this is very unfair.

 

Please read this thread here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440572-Yorkshire-Bank-refuse-to-consider-paying-back-bank-charges&p=4685563&highlight=basic+account#post4685563 and my comments at post 8.

 

Does any of this interest you?

How much have they taken in total so far?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I think that this is very unfair.

 

Please read this thread here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440572-Yorkshire-Bank-refuse-to-consider-paying-back-bank-charges&p=4685563&highlight=basic+account#post4685563 and my comments at post 8.

 

Does any of this interest you?

How much have they taken in total so far?

 

They have had over £200.00. in charges at £15.00 per charge. as I type I am on the phone (0845) for the last 36 mins, to a person who keeps putting me on hold to 'clarify' . I explained the change in circumstances etc, and that we would manage the account better in the forthcoming weeks and going forward, they did not give a jot, and repeated that Cashminder has regulations and conditions so that we cant have an overdraft and any dd not paid will carry the £15.00. charge. so that's it then folks, seems I am scuppered with these charges etc.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been on the phone. Did you read our customer services guide before you did this?

 

Did you read the thread I linked you to?

 

Would you like to take so,me action to get your money back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have been on the phone. Did you read our customer services guide before you did this?..........yes

 

did you read the thread i linked you to?.......... Yes

 

would you like to take so,me action to get your money back?

longshot. As coop customer services said they cant be reclaimed such as the conditions of cashminder acc ?

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks terms and conditions our subject to overriding statutory duties. This includes for instance the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations and also BCOBS.

 

If there is a conflict between the banks terms and conditions and their statutory duty to treat you fairly, then they must treat you fairly and the contractual provisions that they are relying upon are not enforceable.

 

Do you really believe everything that the banks customer services department tell you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks terms and conditions our subject to overriding statutory duties. This includes for instance the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations and also BCOBS.

 

If there is a conflict between the banks terms and conditions and their statutory duty to treat you fairly, then they must treat you fairly and the contractual provisions that they are relying upon are not enforceable.

 

Do you really believe everything that the banks customer services department tell you?

 

Hi Bankfodder....No not at all, I despise the recent conversation I have just had with them, but I dont want to rock the boat incase they close the account then I will be up the creek so to speak. are there any other banks I can try for basic account ?

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the cashminder account is that they do reserve the right to close the account after two overdrawn or returned payments. I am assuming that the payments that have not been made are either DD's or SO's.

 

HBOS do an easycash account and Yorkshire might consider you.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the cashminder account is that they do reserve the right to close the account after two overdrawn or returned payments. I am assuming that the payments that have not been made are either DD's or SO's.

 

HBOS do an easycash account and Yorkshire might consider you.

 

I have had approx 12 returned due to insufficient funds, and three letters advising that they may close acc, yes all were dd's, however I have cancelled all dd's from today till i sort my finances which have only went pearshaped since missus lost her job 6 month ago.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder....No not at all, I despise the recent conversation I have just had with them, but I dont want to rock the boat incase they close the account then I will be up the creek so to speak. are there any other banks I can try for basic account ?

Of course, you are right to be concerned about the possibility of account closure. However it would be unfair of them to take this action in retaliation against you simply for enforcing the rules. If they have a pattern of not closing your account despite repeated returned payments and then they suddenly leap into action once you have begun a BCOBS action, I would say that this would be prima facie evidence of further unfair treatment and you could add this to your complaint as well. In fact if I started to threaten them with BCOBS, I would point out at the outset that if if they took any action to close the account, that it will be considered to be a retaliatory closure and therefore unfair and that that would also be added to the BCOBS claim.

 

Also in your favour is the fact that if they have been taking money under fairly from your account, then you have a very good basis for saying that the fact that they have left you short of money has itself produced further financial problems for you and that this has led to the further returned payments.

 

In other words their unfair treatment of you is precisely what has put you into position where you have not been able to manage your account properly. We can call this a "but ... for" test. But for their unfair treatment, the account would not have been mismanaged.

 

I think that this is a powerful and winning argument and of course it is the basis of all unfair treatment.

 

If you wanted to begin an action under BCOBS against the bank then I rate your chances as very high. In fact I rate the chances very high that they would come back to you and settle in order to avoid the action. I am quite sure that the banks would be petrified to find BCOBS action being brought against them for this kind of thing because there is a lot of money to be refunded if the principle is established.

 

I certainly think that you are right anyway to be concerned about the account closure and I would start looking around for a parachute account. It never does any harm to have two or three UK bank accounts around because it gives you a certain flexibility and immunity from vindictive and vengeful action by your friendly British High Street Bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...