Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Weightmans Claimform - Old Lloyds credit card***Claim Discontinued***


Craigbadger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Craig,

 

Thanks for posting it, I cannot load the 2nd page for some unknown reason!

 

Can read that the front is an 'Application' but nothing else on it apart from the fact that the date of signature is the 10th but the executed signature is the 9th! Odd that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Craig,

 

Thanks for posting it, I cannot load the 2nd page for some unknown reason!

 

Can read that the front is an 'Application' but nothing else on it apart from the fact that the date of signature is the 10th but the executed signature is the 9th! Odd that!

 

Think its gone dead, will re upload it quick :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondered what people have found, I know they should have everything but I cant imagine this being the case with all creditors?, theyve aknowledged and accepted my request in writing and say it will be delivered by the 11th may which I presume means they have accepted my request to send me everything. They managed to dig up an agreement from 98 so hoping they have a fair bit, they do seem to be the most organised of all my creditors ie quick responses and actually responding.

Be curious to see what theyve actually had off me since 96, masses of loans, 2 cards, 3 accounts, several insurances/ppis etc.

 

Infact on that subject, how far back am I able to reclaim for card charges and ppi?.

 

Ive seen some say 6 years(including the mse guide) but then ive seen others say as far back as you have paperwork for.

 

:)

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Regarding a Lloyds cca I recieved a while ago.

 

 

I had given up on this being unenforceable but now i'm not so sure.

 

I hadnt done so before but I cut off the borders and lined the 2 together.

 

 

The front page has been date stamped and on the back there is an indentation of a stamp,

but these 2 do not line up right, the stamp on 1 side is clearly an inch higher than on the other.

 

I'm just trying to work out if this means either the 2 are not from the same page

and using photo copies as the stamps would match or 2 it is a stamp where it was in a pile of agreements all being stamped.

The thing is it is a pretty clear stamp.

 

Just trying to explain it really and I might be miles off. :)

 

Here are the chopped scans of the 2. Open them up in different tabs and you can line them up. Ive done so with the originals aswell.

 

http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/LLOYDS/lloydscca2a-1-1.jpg?t=1274465557

http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/LLOYDS/lloydscca2b-1.jpg?t=1274465741

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hahaha

Not a lot really.

All I noticed was that the date stamp and the indentation on the reverse dont seem to match up.

I have my suspicion it was 2 seperate sheets but dont really wanna test it. Gonna get my charges and ppi back(with contractual 30% interest) and see where I am then. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i'm going to try and reclaim charges from Lloyds.

These are what ive come up with, interest charged at 30%apr or 2.1 monthly.

Ive not added the 8% yet.

 

Could someone just tell me if they look about right?, this is the first ive tried so still very unsure

 

 

Date of Charge Type Charge Contractual Interest Total

07/07/2005 Late charges 20 66.44 86.44

05/08/2005 Late charges 20 64.43 84.43

08/11/2005 Late charges 20 58.35 78.35

08/03/2006 Late charges 20 50.9 70.9

07/04/2006 Late charges 20 49.2 69.2

08/06/2006 Late charges 20 45.8 65.8

07/07/2006 Late charges 12 26.56 38.56

04/10/2006 Unpaid chq/dd charge 12 23.88 35.88

07/11/2006 Late charges 12 22.9 34.9

07/12/2006 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 22.06 34.06

08/01/2007 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 21.21 33.21

01/02/2007 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 20.54 32.54

08/03/2007 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 19.63 31.63

08/03/2007 Late charges 12 19.63 31.63

10/04/2007 Late charges 12 18.8 30.8

07/11/2007 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 13.95 25.95

07/11/2007 Late charges 12 13.95 25.95

07/12/2007 Late charges 12 13.32 25.32

08/01/2008 Late charges 12 12.67 24.67

07/02/2008 Late charges 12 12.08 24.08

08/04/2008 Overlimit in the last month fee 12 10.92 22.92

08/04/2008 Late charges 12 10.92 22.92

09/10/2008 Late fee 12 7.74 19.74

09/10/2008 Overlimit fee 12 7.74 19.74

09/11/2008 Overlimit fee 12 7.25 19.25

09/12/2008 Overlimit fee 12 6.78 18.78

09/01/2009 Late fee 12 6.32 18.32

09/08/2009 Late payment charge 12 3.42 15.42

09/08/2009 Overlimit charge 12 3.42 15.42

11/10/2009 Late payment charge 12 2.65 14.65

11/10/2009 Overlimit charge 12 2.65 14.65

09/11/2009 Late payment charge 12 2.31 14.31

09/11/2009 Overlimit charge 12 2.31 14.31

09/12/2009 Late payment charge 12 1.97 13.97

09/12/2009 Overlimit charge 12 1.97 13.97

10/01/2010 Late payment charge 12 1.61 13.61

10/01/2010 Overlimit charge 12 1.61 13.61

27/01/2010 Late payment charge 12 1.42 13.42

27/01/2010 Overlimit charge 12 1.42 13.42

05/04/2010 Late payment charge 12 0.7 12.7

11/04/2010 Overlimit charge 12 0.64 12.64

06/05/2010 Late payment charge 12 0.39 12.39

09/05/2010 Overlimit charge 12 0.36 12.36

03/06/2010 Late payment charge 12 0.11 12.11

09/06/2010 Overlimit charge 12 0.05 12.05

588 682.98 1270.98

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

post the spreadsheet as a pdf

then it might make sense......

 

oto one one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

browse to your pdf file and upload it

hit close this windows at the bottom below upload it box

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok

now do 8% each entry in your righthand column from date of charge to date of claim.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

same monthly

 

there is a simple one in the stickys

butthat does the same

it seems to be what the fos use

and those that have coughed already

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right theyve defaulted me for £150 after asking them for assistance, and seem to of forgotten about £700 charges + contractual interest and 8% simple interest and the mis sold ppi policy dating back to 1998, so as ive been advised to its just a matter of waiting for them to terminate and writing to them and thanking them very much for there unlawful rescission of contract.

Ofcourse it wont be as easy as that but sure as hell saves me the hassle of reclaiming what would probably of covered the balance and the balance will be frozen.

 

God I love this site. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Had posted these elswhere a few weeks back but have received termination notice now so want some confirmation before I do anything.

I wrote to the creditor a month ago saying I was having money troubles(truth) and asking for breathing space. Creditor obliged and said they would accept reduced payments for 6 months, reserving there rights under default. Same day I receive default notice.

 

Notice dated 22/06, received 29/06 and received in an envelope post marked "S", clearly not a first class service as it took a week to reach me. Giving me 17 days from the date of notice. So I clearly did not get 14 days.

 

Default http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/ulster/ulsterdn.jpg

 

Envelope http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/ulster/ulsterenvelope.jpg

 

Termination http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/ulstertermination.jpg

 

I guess i'd just like some advice now.

Have they unlawfully terminated the contract?

Does the fact that ive written to them making an agreement affect anything?, also the termination doesnt make it 100% clear if ive even been defaulted yet. See bottom sentence.

Also it states they are adding interest, can they do this?

 

Any advice on where I should go with this? Seems odd to terminate a fortnight after agreeing a payment plan.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have clearly terminated the contract they cannot add interest. I would send them a letter pointing out this fact. If you are happy to carry on paying reduced payments on what is actually owe them tell them you will pay off the debt at xxx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would now be a good time to try a full and final?

I have got £6000 coming from a ppi reclaim before august 13th. There are atleast £300 charges + interest on this balance of £1700.

The agreement is 100% enforceable but is there any harm in say offering £900 as a full and final, reminding them about the charges which I aim to pursue and point out the faults with the default?.

 

I was offering £20 a month and dont really see me being able to afford more once this ppi money has been spent, I want to use it to clear as many debts as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would offer £700 at this stage. I would point out that the Default notice was sent second class post thereby not giving you the requisite 14 days clear notice and the fact that they have terminated the agreement means that they cannot add further charges. Put all the dates in,ie date of default notice, date received, date of termination.

 

Make the letter sound as if you are doing them a favour by offering the settlement saying they have first refusal at the money available to you, if they refuse then it will go to your other creditors and you will then only be in a position to offer £10 per month.

 

I would also put in the letter as there are somewhere in the region of £300 in charges on this account should you not accept the offer then you will pursue reclaiming these to be offset against the total owed.

 

I would finish off by saying that as you are being pressurised by other creditors this offer therefore only remains open for 7 days.

 

This offer is also made on the understanding that the balance is not sold to a DCA and that the account is shown as settled with the CRAs.

 

Good luck with this.

 

I've used this tactic and it worked for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...