Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The FCA has publicly censured Premier FX Limited (Premier FX) for failing to safeguard its customers’ money and for misuse of its payment accounts under the Payments Services Regulations. In doing so, Premier FX seriously misled its customers about the services it was authorised to provide and how it held customers’ money. View the full article
    • I have sent a response to quote that and also say that i will be submitting my already prepared claim to the county court   Thanks for the quick response! I will see what happens next
    • The High Street-only retailer says it has lost £1.1bn in sales due to the recent lockdown. View the full article
    • Ignore it.   Or,   If it were me I would send in the following email  
    • Below is the response i have received to the emailed version of the letter of claim.  They should get the actual letter today       Thank you for contacting our Executive Office team. My name is Gavin and your email has been received and I have personally been asked to investigate this matter for you.   I’m very sorry this has happened, and I would really like to help you with this today by assisting you in making a claim, should you wish to do so.   I can see that this parcel was booked through Packlink Shipping. Packlink use our network to send their parcels through, but they are an independent shipper and any enquiries about their parcels need to go directly to them.   Here is the link to the Packlink website and claims department: https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360014270619   You can also make contact with Packlink with the links below.   • eBay Delivery Help Center: https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb • Packlink Help Center: https://support.packlink.com/hc/en-gb   I hope this helps you to get your Packlink enquiry resolved.   Kind regards,        
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Erudio - Sent me my slc CCA - now Court Claim


Recommended Posts

Dont send anything extra

Dont need cca either

Dispute is already deferred

 

Just go alone with it

 

I will guess drydens ( or whomever hit the button to sent out these pap letters)

Has no idea what they are doing and has no idea on individual case history

Dont forget drydens think these are just a std consumer credit loan with no idea how slc stuff works

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

hi guys so just opened my post and thankfully no rubber stamp! Hearing date march 2021, documents to be submitted electronically   Andy much obliged for this, again thank you guys for the su

So ready to post this defence. Having looked at what you wrote for the other thread:   ----------------------------------- 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 T

  • 3 weeks later...

i am ready to send off the PAP form and reply.

No CCA to be requested as agreed but wasnt sure about the following points to add.

I have posted my response draft below.

 

I will tick box D, and im pretty sure i dont need to send my income and financial statement forms or should i?

i will be sending pages 10, 11, 12 and 13 signed with the below letter:

 

_______________

 

I enclose the form requested to be returned.

I bring your attention to that this debt is in dispute as I am not in arrears.

My account should be deferred.

I have been in correspondence with your client, all of which proof is noted.

The deferment forms were sent in the correct timescales and correct under the decision of the financial ombudsman service.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

___________

 

 

Should i tick box I and add:

 

I will also require:

 

A copy of the Default Notice (mortgage style loan so N/A?)

A copy of the Notice of Assignment (N/A as Not assigned to anyone new?)

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, by the original creditor or Arrow the debt purchaser or any predecessor.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Not sure those further requests are necessary but wasn't sure.

Anything else i should add? in this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?490204-SLC-Erudio-1993-loan-now-Dryden-PAP-letter/page2

 

They have sent a copy of all their deferment forms (unsigned) ticking box H, along with a SAR request to erudio (ticking box I), should i do the same?

Link to post
Share on other sites
i am ready to send off the PAP form and reply.

No CCA to be requested as agreed but wasnt sure about the following points to add. if you've not ever sent a CCA request yes send one staple it to our version of the pap reply form]

I have posted my response draft below.

 

I will tick box D, put as blue below i dispute the debt because..

 

 

and im pretty sure i dont need to send my income and financial statement forms or should i? no we have said don't in that thread.

 

i will be sending pages 10, 11, 12 and 13 signed with the below letter: no you DONT SIGN IT read the text post 4 here https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

 

_______________

 

I enclose the form requested to be returned.

I bring your attention to that this debt is in dispute as I am not in arrears.

My account should be deferred.

I have been in correspondence with your client, all of which proof is noted.

The deferment forms were sent in the correct timescales and correct under the decision of the financial ombudsman service.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

___________

 

 

Should i tick box I and add:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

read the advise here.

I will also require:

 

A copy of the Default Notice (mortgage style loan so N/A?)

A copy of the Notice of Assignment (N/A as Not assigned to anyone new?)

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, by the original creditor or Arrow the debt purchaser or any predecessor.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Not sure those further requests are necessary but wasn't sure.

Anything else i should add? in this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?490204-SLC-Erudio-1993-loan-now-Dryden-PAP-letter/page2

 

They have sent a copy of all their deferment forms (unsigned

 

 

ticking box H, along with a SAR request to erudio

 

 

(ticking box I), should i do the same?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks, i have read that a few times just unclear on a couple things

 

so i will NOT include deferment copies

 

I WILL Tick box D

 

Yes i did request my CCA from Erudio but what they sent me was microfiche copies with reconstitiuted T & C's , i did upload but i cant see where those pages have gone, however i have them. Also have SAR from SLC. So should i still request this again?

 

i WILL tick box I and request

I also require you to supply the following..

a copy of the Default Notice

A copy of the Notice of Assignment

A complete set of statements detailing exactly how the debt has accrued detailing:

I. All Transactions.

II. any additional charges, be them by the original creditor or you xxxx the debt purchaser or any predecessor DCA.

III. details of all contractual interest added by whom and on what date.

IV. List of ALL Payments made toward the Agreement

 

Do i include my statement on my covering letter - you highlighted in blue not sure what that meant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have deferred then they have them you don't need to copy again to them.

when did you last CCA?

 

you cant do anything 'wrong' so I wouldnt really sweat too much about what you need to put or include or say

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Dx100uk, last CCA was 2014 so probably worth doing again

 

 

Cool will be posting off later today i think

 

 

I'll no doubt report back with any update

 

 

Thanks again!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All, so update

 

2 separately posted letters received by Drydens:

 

1 - stating the client (erudio) confirms they never received any request for deferment since they took over the loan.

Under the terms i can no longer defer and the full amount is repayable.

if i dont pay in full by the 26th Nov i need to call and arrange a plan

 

Strange considering this all initially started because they sent me their deferment which i didnt want to sign and sent the original.

I have letters back and forth and complaints which they acknowledge and i have proof of these being sent, and of them even telling me about my deferment options and still attaching their forms.

 

2 - second letter is of them acknowledging my requests attached with PAP, returning my £1 PO, stating this is no longer required??

They state the account will go on a 30 day hold while they investigate.

Kind of conflicting since above they state i must pay in full within the next 9 days.

 

I have a lot of recorded proof and letters back and forth which clearly had my deferments in them but not their deferment hence them playing silly buggers.

 

i dont however have recorded proof of every year only 2 years, but letter responses from them 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 where they acknowledge my complaints not directly addressing my deferments but again all relating to the same issue, and even sent me deferment forms

 

Not sure if i should reply and state i have all of this and send proof?

i do feel if i ignore they will take this to court which i would rather not do, but if must be so be it, i have done as requested and i am still under the deferment threshold so i should have been entitled to this.

 

But of course i shall await to see what your thoughts are

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

ball is in their court

you do nothing

sit on your hands

 

post 10 and post 16 refer.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Quick update. i drafted a letter to erudio re-post 16, thank you again dx100uk

 

But also Drydens have sent me yet another PAP! Im presuming as its a PAP i must again respond? Either they are just automating this crap or they are ignoring the previous one and sending again

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep someone else has had a duplicate too just like you

same again.

I suspect drydens have realised there are numerous loans within the erudio ref number

and are sending out one for each

trouble is they are using the same number :lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the same as you did for the last PAP reply form

no-one said send payslips before did we?

hope you didn't

or was that part of the SLC deferement stuff you have to send when using their old form I forget?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx100Uk sorry for the late reply,

 

Sure thing im doing the pap form right now again.

 

Nope never sent payslips or anything. Only thing i have ever sent in the past to erudio is my original SLC deferment form, a CCA request and SAR request. And also re: post 16 a letter demanding that, which they sent a stupid non sensical reply to, which we ignored.

 

This time i am planning to send the same letter re; post 16 demanding they give me my entitlement to my deferment, but to clarify shall i send another SLC deferment? and im signing the deferment correct? i think we agreed signing was ok because i didnt dispute the debt only the right to deferment.

 

Hi europa16, haha so ridiculous isn't it, fully entitled to my deferment and very frustrating. I shall be watching your thread and wish you luck. Thank god for this forum and dx100uk's help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd just send the old SLC deferment forms for the loans on years whereby you didn't.

nothing more..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...

Update!

 

Received the same generic letter from drydens 'looking into it' as last time, they returned by £1 postal order RE CCA saying not applicable?

 

Erudio replied telling me that they investigated the matter and that my last deferment was 2009!

i dished out a letter from them stating my deferment ended in 2014!

interesting... seeing as thats when all this kicked off as the whole reason behind this is they wouldn't accept my original SLC deferment.

 

im tempted to send the proof of their letter stating the 2014 deferment ending, contradicting their letter stating 2009 was my last deferment althought wanted advice first

 

as always thank you for the support

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

if your last deferment was in their eyes 2009 the debt is statute barred.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Extremely sorry for the late reply here, i was away.

 

Oh right? i wasnt aware at all thats how statute barred worked! i thought it was from the date of defaulting or arrears.

 

So in this case what should be my next steps you think?

 

Thank you once again

Link to post
Share on other sites

last deferment or written and signed letter by you.

 

see where it goes

 

most of these letters that resulted in various posts here and elsewhere have gone quiet.

 

me thinks an office junior was tasked with raising money for the firms mass xmas holiday in the Bahamas funded by mugd that will panic and pay up.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha sounds about right!

 

Great ill see what happens next but yes i have sensed it go quiet.. last letter from drydens is they were supposed to come back to me and havent so far.. twice

 

Thanks once again and ill report as soon as i hear anything

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update:

erudio sent a letter notifying transfer to drydens? bit odd seeing as they have already contacted me with 2 sets of PAP (as above posts), potentially just an automated system letter

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys

 

UPdate: drydens sent me a letter stating they have taken the debt to County court claim. Received the county court claim in the post today. Looks like i may well be going to court! Never defended a CCC before, ive started compiling all my evidence and refreshing all the posts in here and others.

 

Any advice on what my ext step should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to Erudio - Sent me my slc CCA - now Court Claim

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...