Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital2coast PCN Lewes - Clamform received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning Dragonfly,

 

 

Great, thanks for your post and the suggested edit. Regarding the old address, am I giving them the new one, I was going to in standard letter format but I don't particularly want them to stay in touch....

 

 

Thanks again

 

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Nope.

 

As long as you've told their client your new address (as you're stating in this letter), you can let them work it out for themselves. There's no point in making life too easy for them evil.gif

 

If their client hasn't noted your change of address, or has lost it, well, that's their own fault and they'll just have to spend another £2.50 with the DVLA to find it out. Shame biggrin.png

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning All,

 

Ok so we sent the above letter last week

apparently they have written back and tthe letters have crossed in the mail.

 

 

As I understand it the RK has received a notice of intention to commence legal proceedings sent to the old address.

 

Despite our offer of a reduced payment etc notice dated 1st June 2015 we haven't received payment

and will pass to our legal team and recommend legal proceedings are commenced.

 

Any advice on the next move please?

 

Many thanks

 

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

You/the RK can safely ignore that one. In fact you/they can pretty much ignore everything from now on except a form N1 (a county court claim), and I don't think they'll be going there somehow spiteful.gif

  • Confused 1

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, blah blah blah, all talk and no action. They dont want to do court because they know there is a good chance the RK is right and they will look very stupid as well as losing money. They only manage a couple of spots and seeing the adverse publicity in the local paper when they lose will kill their business.

That is why they are now begging.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Morning to you all,

 

All has been quiet since my last posts and thanks again for your help and support.

 

 

However, the RK has now received a N1 form from a county court.

 

 

The debt was sold on 11/10/2016 and letters and N1 have been sent to our old address.

 

 

The clim form is dated 28/10/16

so we have missed the 14 day deadline as only received it last night.

 

 

Ah just read there is 5 days from the 28/10 so still just in time to respond.

Does RK wish to defend the claim, admit or ask for 28 days to prepare the defence?

 

Can i use the letter above again saying all sent to wrong address and ask for case to be thrown out as might not have received all the letters?

 

Slightly panicking as suddnely seems as though the law is against the RK.

 

Many thanks for any advice you can give, will look at parking prankster in the meantime.

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

go onto the MCOL website

[see the claimform]

 

register as an individual

then log in

 

and respond to a claim

hit the [AOS] boc

 

and defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL

 

job done.

 

next

get a CPR 31:14 running to the claimants solicirors

 

[Your address]

.

[Their address]

.

[Date]

.

Dear Sir or Madam,

.

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

.

CPR 31.14 Request

.

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county court.

.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest and counter claim all of your claim.

.

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

.

1. proof of assignment from the landlord to create contracts and make claims in your own name.

.

2.proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007

the contract between VCS and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and make claims in their own name,

Planning Permission for their signage under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007,

copies of the notice to driver,

notice to keeper and any other correspondence from VCS or Gladstones to the defendant.

Give them 14 days to comply

.

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are disclosed at your earliest convenience..

.

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy.

.

Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

.

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request please confirm in your response.

.

Yours faithfully

.

TYPE YOUR NAME DO NOT SIGN IT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX thats really helpful and we'll get the Q&A answeres. in your first post of today you refer to VCS, should that be changed to the relevent orignal parking company or similar.

 

Is it ok date wise, 28 october plus 14 days acknowlede, 5 serve and 14 to reply?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't need to see the claimform

 

 

removed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

timings are

 

 

19 days from date on claimform = must AOS by

 

 

33 days must file defence

 

 

the date on the claimform is ONE in the count

 

 

yes ofcourse change the parking company name!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 64^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't need the claimform

do that link

get AOS done now

you are ok on timings

LIP [litigant In Persons] often make mistakes

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX, i thought you wanted to see the claim form as per the other thread.

 

Name of the Claimant ? MIL collections ltd, quay street truro tr1 2HE

 

Date of issue – 28 October 2016 (only received yesterday as sent to old address)

What is the claim for –

 

Charge for parking on private land

1. the claimant purchased the debt on 11/10/2016. Assignment notice sent 12/10/2016.

2 The defendent was registered keeper and /or driver of vehicle xxxx at the time.

the charge is as follows: Ref xxxx offence: failure to dispaly a valid permit. Location: Eastgate wharf lewes BN7 2AS

Date & time 28/11/2014 09.48 Vehicle make model xxxxxxx Issue date & time 23/12/2014 18:.24.47 3.

The claimant wrote to the defendent on 12/10/2016 informing of an intention to issueas summons.

No resoltion received.

The claimanat claims

1. Debt amount £160.00

2 Administration and collection fee £50. total £210.00

 

What is the value of the claim? £210

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? MIL Collections

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Only last night with the other mail from old house, moved 23 months ago and informed original PCN issuer of this.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

as soon as you defend MIL will back off because they have no locus standi and the claim is fraudulent and they know it.

READ UP ON THEM, the parking pranksters blog is a good place to start

 

They havent purchased the debt and they know it.

When you send a CPR 31.14 request demand to see proof the debt exists and demand "strict proof" the debt has been lawfully assigned as well as all of the other normal contract, planning and other matters.

 

 

Let them know that you are seeking to have the matter struck out as vexatious litigation as they know that they have no locus and that you wil be seeking a full costs recovery order under CPR27(quote some of their past wrongs back to them).

better to get them to discontinue now rather than have to waste your time on a day out they arent going to attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why has this been all sent to your old address?

 

have you not updated DVLA?

 

cause if you haven't

that's the more important thing to do

THEY CAN FINE YOU UPTO £1000!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may have used old address if it was correct at time of event.

 

 

they will then be obliged to use that as service address until you tell them of correct addy.

 

 

If they then continue to write to old address you can make a complaint about abuse of process (probably got its own CPR number)

 

 

so make sure the AOS returned to the courts service has the correct address on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the replies, yes DVLA updated and orignal pcn issuer also, they haave chosen to ignore that. Subsequent correspondence we reminded them of COA but didnt provide the new one and they havent bothered checking with dvla since..

 

hi, i'm on the website now doing the claim. ive put that the time from ANPR was over allowed time, been sending everyting to wrong address, DVLA knows about COA, demand to see proof the debt exists, vexatious litigation. Anything else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry

all you should have done is ack'd the claim {AOS}

so you've filed a defence too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

Thanks for the message, yes, the mcol sort of led me through filing a defense/writing a little piece about the claim. I hve had an acknowledgeemtn from the court but still dont have the solicitiros details, where can i get these please so i can send

the CPR31?

 

Many thanks

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be on the front page of the claimform?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...