Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SWT court summons, what to do next? - ** SETTLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

In August of last year I was caught by an inspector on a train to Waterloo, with the wrong ticket. I had purchased a cheaper ticket that would not reach my destination, when I was questioned I panicked about the fine and initially gave a different address to my own. I then admitted this and signed the inspectors statement.

 

I won't make excuses, it was the worst decision I have ever made and was something that has caused me great pain and regret since. All I can say is that I was travelling up to a temporary work placement for which I was not getting paid and was short of money at the time, also my mum is a recovering alcoholic and had a relapse the previous day. These are the only factors I can give that contributed to what was a stupid and idiotic action. I cannot stress enough the pain and regret I have experienced since. It was a first time offence and I'm not usually the sort of person to get in trouble.

 

In December SWT sent me a letter asking for further details to which I duly responded, humbly apologising as much as I could and asking whether they would consider settling out of court.

 

I have just heard back from them yesterday as I have received a court summons to attend in February.

 

I have read many forum posts and believe the next step I should take is to ring them up and try to get them to agree and out of court settlement. Is this the best way to go about this?

 

James

Edited by honeybee13
Paragraphs.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG, James. I've popped a few paragraphs into your post, to make it easier to read.

 

Yes, you can try ringing SWT's prosecutions office to continue asking if they will settle out of court. You can negotiate up to and including the day it goes to court. Someone like Old-Codja can talk you through that part and taking cash with you on the day.

 

You need to enter a plea to the mags court. Have you done that or do you know how you are going to plead?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply and any help you can provide. I know I deserve it but this has been a nightmare over the last few months, I feel I've punished myself enough but anyway I just to get to the best possible outcome.

 

I will try and get in contact with them over the phone and see if there's any resolution we can come to.

 

If this can't be reached I feel the best thing I can do is submit a guilty plea by post, to try and get the fine reduced. If it came to this, would I still attend court? Firstly to speak to the prosecutor and if nothing can be agreed to apologise in court and admit guilt. What are repercussions other than the fine?

Thanks

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just heard back from them yesterday as I have received a court summons to attend in February.

 

I have read many forum posts and believe the next step I should take is to ring them up and try to get them to agree and out of court settlement. Is this the best way to go about this?

 

 

Your frank admission and explanation of what you did is refreshing. Thank you.

 

What charges are specified in the Summons/es that you have received?

 

I note that you said that you paid a short fare and gave a false address so, correct me if you have received something different, but I would expect that you will have received Summonses specifying the following two charges:

 

i) that you did pay a fare for a shorter distance than that you intended to travel and did travel beyond the distance for which you had paid with the intention of avoid payment of the correct fare contrary to Section 5(3)(b) of The Regulation of Railways Act [1889]

 

ii) that when asked for your address you did give false details to an officer of the railway company with the intention of avoiding payment of the correct fare contrary to Section 5(3)© of The Regulation of Railways Act [1889]

 

If this is the case, you may consider writing to SWT expressing sincere remorse, apologising to the company and giving an undertaking never to travel without a valid rail ticket in future and ask if you might be allowed to dispose of this matter by paying any outstanding fare along with all of the costs that have been reasonably incurred in dealing with this matter.

 

Sending your letter by signed for/recorded delivery is a very good idea. Allow a couple of days to ensure that your letter has been received and then follow up with a polite telephone call.

 

The TOC do not have to agree to settle these matters by this process, but you lose nothing by trying. Let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly i'd like to thank you for your advice, as much as i'm in the wrong for committing this offence, like i stated before this is not in my nature and was a first offence.

Despite my wrongdoings it means a lot to have helpful advise and information regarding the situation, to help me to gain the best possible outcome and try and put right what i have done wrong.

 

I will also state that i'm a student and am very worried about the implications this could have on my future. Going forward i intend to be as honest and helpful as possible in order to try and get this resolved. If i cannot settle out of court, i believe i will plead guilty by post to minimise the fine, i don't see any need for the witness to attend. If i pleaded guilty by post, do i need to attend court as well?

 

The charges are worded slightly differently but i believe the ones you have suggested are correct.

 

I will write to them first i think, i did try to apologise and offer to pay in my letter that responded to them asking for details about the event. However whether this is ignored as they were only concerned with the details at that point, i'm not sure. I will try writing to them again, particularly as i want to make my remorse clear and really apologise for what i've done.

 

How do i send the letter by signed for/recorded delivery?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the letter i write to them, should i address it to the prosecuting officer. The information i have been given is by Mr J Allan of SWT prosecutions department, i believe it would be best to address it to him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the letter i write to them, should i address it to the prosecuting officer. The information i have been given is by Mr J Allan of SWT prosecutions department, i believe it would be best to address it to him?

 

 

Yes, the wording of the charge may vary according to who wrote it, but the general content should be similar and the legislation will be clear

 

Yes, replies by recorded delivery always best

 

Yes, write to whoever wrote to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should i mention in the letter about my mother struggling with alcohol addiction and that she had a relapse just before the incident? This is not a direct reason for what i did or an excuse, but her illness has been deeply upsetting and difficult to deal with at times and has been going on for the last few years. I believe it has affected me badly at times and has clouded my judgement. This particular relapse certainly meant my head was not in the right place when i committed the offence.

 

I have written the letter out and will add a small bit about the above if that is suggested.

 

I hope to post it later today.

 

The court hearing is due on Feb 12th.

 

Any more advise from anyone would be greatly appreciated, thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should i mention in the letter about my mother struggling with alcohol addiction and that she had a relapse just before the incident? This is not a direct reason for what i did or an excuse, but her illness has been deeply upsetting and difficult to deal with at times and has been going on for the last few years. I believe it has affected me badly at times and has clouded my judgement. This particular relapse certainly meant my head was not in the right place when i committed the offence.

 

I have written the letter out and will add a small bit about the above if that is suggested.

 

I hope to post it later today.

 

The court hearing is due on Feb 12th.

 

Any more advise from anyone would be greatly appreciated, thanks for your time.

 

Hi James,

 

I wouldn't mention specifics that could look like excuses. If you feel you have to explain this, simply say you were struggling with a personal issue which lead to your error of judgement, making clear you're not trying to excuse your actions, or defend them. You should make it clear that this was a one-off error on your part and you fully appreciate the severity of what you have done. I'd also say that a conviction could affect your future job prospects and ask that they consider allowing you to meet all their reasonable admin costs in order not to take the matter to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the reply, i did mention some of the above but only briefly and made it clear that this was not an excuse for my actions. I was honest and did not defend my actions. I have made clear all of your suggestions in the letter.

 

I am now trying to ring the department to try and speak to someone to follow on from the letter. However i cannot get hold of them, the number simply rings out.

The number i am ringing is 02380728022

 

Do you know of a different number by which to contact them? I am confused as to why no one is picking up the phone or why there is not answer machine or automated message.

 

I will keep trying the number for the time being.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the customer relations team who in turn spoke to the prosecutions department, who have said they received the letter and have asked me to attend the court hearing.

I would like some advice as to where to go from here, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the customer relations team who in turn spoke to the prosecutions department, who have said they received the letter and have asked me to attend the court hearing.

I would like some advice as to where to go from here, thanks.

I wouldn't take the Customer Services teams answer to be honest. You can obviously keep trying the number given, but they do get very busy due to the usual size of these departments. Of course you can attend court and speak to the prosecutor there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I contacted the customer relations team they told me they spoke to the prosecution department whilst I was on hold and they said to attend the court hearing, I asked whether they had received my letter and they said yes, it seems like they are ignoring it.

I have to admit I feel absolutely gutted at the moment and feel like my future is slipping away from me. I now feel I have no control of the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to plead guilty by post and tell them that the witness need not attend. I hope to minimise the fine.

 

I know I would not need to attend court but I feel I should do so as it will be the last chance to plead to the prosecutor to settle my case out of court.

 

I'm absolutely gutted they have responded how they have, to be perfectly honest I am very scared for my future, particularly job prospects as I am still a student.

I had hoped the letter and fact it was a first time offence might have meant they would offer some leniency.

 

Any advise from anyone would be greatly appreciated right now. Thanks

Edited by James-123
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are summonsed for the two offences mentioned earlier, obviously it does result in a criminal record with the two convictions listed.

 

A disclosure (Criminal Records) check (which employers can request) would list these convictions as:

 

RW89005

Travelling beyond distance for which rail fare paid

 

RW89006

Giving false name and address

 

That is the terminology used on Disclosure certificates, word for word, so employers may be a bit more understanding than you expect.

 

Realistically, I'd say you're probably looking at a fine of £350-£400, £100 costs, plus the rail fare, so around £500.

 

If they've read your letter and told you that they are still proceeding, and you've chosen NOT to attend court, then there's not very much you can do!

 

You could attend court in person, and arrive a few hours before the hearing was scheduled and try and find the SWT prosecutor, and see if he will negotiate a settlement with you, but you'd have to take hard cash with you, so if he does agree, you can make immediate payment.

 

That is pretty much your only option!

 

The "false name/address" thing is the fatal element!

 

In the event other legislation is used, combinations of the below codes will appear on the CRB:

 

RL05044

Enter compulsory ticket area without a ticket - Railway byelaw

 

RL05045

Board a train without a valid ticket - Railway byelaw

 

RL05046

Fail/refuse to hand over a valid ticket - Railway byelaw

 

RL05047

Occupy reserved seat/berth without a valid ticket - Railway byelaw

 

RL05048

Alter a ticket with intent to defraud - Railway byelaw

 

RL05049

Use an altered ticket with intent to defraud - Railway byelaw

 

RL05050

Buy/sell ticket from unauthorised source - Railway byelaw

 

RL05051

Transfer/receive a used/partly used ticket - Railway byelaw

 

RL05052

Use ticket obtained from unauthorised person/machine - Railway byelaw

 

RL05053

Sell ticket as an unauthorised person - Railway byelaw

 

RL05054

Purchase ticket with incorrect fare for use by another - Railway byelaw

 

RL05055

Produce/transfer ticket with incorrect fare - Railway byelaw

 

RL45002

Refuse to quit railway carriage at destination

 

RW89004

Travelling without paying rail fare

 

RW89005

Travelling beyond distance for which rail fare paid

 

RW89006

Giving false name and address

 

RW89007

Attempting to travel without paying rail fare

 

RW89008

Failing to show ticket and failing to pay fare and failing to provide name and address

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help

 

So as I see it at the moment:

- I will plead guilty by post and attend court

- I can try to negotiate with the prosecutor before the hearing

- If I cannot negotiate I will make my apologies in the court and await the consequences

- I will be given a fine, how is this paid? Is it usually in instalments?

- I will then get a criminal record and recieve the above statements on my crb check?

- you suggest employers may be considerate with these offences? Would these only have worse implications just on certain industries such as law etc? I'm not looking to enter law or civil service etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Stigy and thank you for answering.

 

Would I be right in saying that you mean speak to the prosecutor before the case is heard please? Just to avoid any misunderstanding. :)

 

HB

Hi, yes that's what I meant. It's been answered now anyway in depth, but I can't emphasis enough how important attending court can be. It shows the prosecutor you're remorseful, and also gives you extra chance to speak to them to try and agree a settlement to have the matter withdrawn.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your help again

 

I would like to ask how much money i should take with me on the day?

 

I believe it was mentioned this could total around £500, should i withdraw this amount to take with me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your help again

 

I would like to ask how much money i should take with me on the day?

 

I believe it was mentioned this could total around £500, should i withdraw this amount to take with me?

 

Thanks

 

£500 should be enough.

 

Remember, it won't guarantee that he will accept it!

 

You also have to be careful not to "negotiate" too much, if you go in with too low an offer he may well just walk away! But you also don't just want to hand over £500, if he'll accept £300, if you understand?

 

You basically need to hand over as much as you can afford, whilst considering if it is worthwhile handing over that amount to avoid a conviction. You'll get one shot at it so if you can't really afford to lose £500, don't offer it!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...