Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx It's with Step Change. Yes that is the balance outstanding plus interest.
    • Hi All, I don't want to keep asking unnecessary and daft questions but as I read up on on stuff to prepare my defence and tthink about my witness statement, I am perusing the following: The BPA Code of practice states under 13. Consideration and Grace Periods: 13.1 The driver must have the chance to consider the Terms and Conditions before entering into the ‘parking contract’ with you. If, having had that opportunity, the driver decides not to park but chooses to leave the car park, you must provide them with a reasonable consideration period to leave, before the driver can be bound by your parking contract. The amount of time in these instances will vary dependant on site size and type but it must be a minimum of 5 minutes. 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place.   Let's say a motorist spends a minimum of 5 minutes to decide, then decides to park, that 5 minutes now doesn't apply? That doesn't make sense to me. So now that a motorist has parked after consideration, thus commencing the parking period, the decision time doesn't apply and parking time commenced when? .... on entry to the car park? This, as far as I can see is not stated in the [Withdrawn] Government document which says: The Code also makes clear that the consideration period ends at the point when the driver has parked and is therefore considered to have accepted the terms and conditions, which could be within the five-minute allowance. Doesn't say anything about it not applying if a parking event takes place.   [Withdrawn] Private Parking Code of Practice: explanatory document – how was it developed and what will it change? - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK So, according to the BPA, if a motorist inadvertently overstayed by 12 minutes for example, they have the 10 minute grace period but because they decided to park, they don't have the 5 minute consideration period because they decided to park and have overstayed by 2 minutes? Sorry if there's something I'm missing here.  
    • there are several threads here already whereby the judge in such cases only made an order to pay the required sum, the registering of a criminal record is at their discretion or not. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Care levels and the elderly by the nhs


tommy456
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I write this because a friend who is nearly 70yrs old has received poor quality of care following him falling and injuring his wrist (open fracture requiring it to be pinned) he was admitted to hospital and sent to a rehabilitation home for the elderly, from what he tells me the care levels he received whilst there weren't good as they ecpected him to sit in a chair at the table following breakfast for hours afterwards, he was in pain,as he had a fractured vertebra a few years ago, he informed staff about it, they also gave him morphine for the pain (fractured wrist ) which led to him being admitted to hospital less an than 2 days following him discharging himself from this so called rehab centre, with a blocked bowel, he had to undergo emergency surgery as a result of being given morphine as it turns out he is allergic to it, he was recently discharged from hospital and is recovering well,

recently he rolled out of bed, no injuries but was taken to hospital as a precaution, he tells me that in the ambulance on route to the hospital the paramedic asked him if he would like to see a priest (for his last rights) i asked was it said as a joke, he says not, he was kept in for several hrs for obs,then discharged

 

My questions are staff at the rehab centre guilty of neglect or malpractice ? and should a paramedic by scaring the life out of OAP's like this ,is this considered normal

It seems to me that they don't like or want to care to those who are old and frail , maybe they should seek a change in career ASAP ?

Who would he or i on his behalf complain to, just that i don't see getting anywhere by complaining to the rehab centre

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two routes of complaint that you can try:

lodge a formal complaint with the Care Quality Commission about the care home, they may also be able to advise regarding the comments of the paramedic.

Contact the Adult Social Services from your local council. Ask to speak to the vulnerable adults team and voice your concerns.

 

Neglect of the elderly in a care home environment is a form of abuse, so you could also try contacting Action on Elder Abuse to see if they can advise or assist in getting a satisfactory outcome to your complaints.

 

One question that springs to mind: Who prescribed the morphine and/or administered it ?

Being a controlled drug, there are strict rules as to the use and storage of morphine.

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on Mr P. I believe the morphine was prescribed for the gentleman's wrist but this is still out of order.

 

Unfortunately many care workers are not only poorly paid, but poorly trained too.

 

I wonder if your friend might benefit from a visit from age uk to see if he may be able to get help of any kind going forward if he needs it Tommy.

Edited by caro
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if it had been prescribed or by whom, The rehab centre is run by the same hospital trust as the A&E he was taken to for the open fracture of his wrist, according to the web site it's staffed by nurses , thing is he told them that that type of pain killer wasn't good for him, he maybe old but still has good mental abilities IMO they just ignored him like they most probably ignore all those who they are supposed to be caring for and that paramedic should be sacked the poor man was stressed enough without an idiot like him/her,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry. My misunderstanding. Trained professionals should know better!!

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately many care workers are not only poorly paid, but poorly trained too.

 

Whilst some are also incompetent to the point of being criminal and being supported by their managers.

 

Currently have a personal interest in a case where a "carer" attempted to administer an overdose in excess of fifty times the prescribed amount to a vulnerable patient. The matter is being investigated by the CQC and Social Services and I'm hoping criminal prosecutions will follow.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy,

 

Complain directly to the NHS Trust involved, have a quick look on their website and you'll find details of the concerns team, they'll co-ordinate the complaint as a whole rather than having to direct different letters to different departments.

 

Independant organisations like CAB or PALS might be worth involving too.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

When it comes to the prescribing of morphine, it's normally done together with a laxative to prevent the constipation that inevitably follows. However, to end up with a blockage is very extreme in the circumstances. As for being left in a chair, could he mobilise himself at all or was he totally reliant on being hoisted to/from where he needed to be? There's certainly scope to question the rehab unit's procedures for working with people with limited mobility and spinal injuries (especially if the pain was prevalent through the morphine!).

 

As for the paramedic, I'd want to get some answers. It may have been a poor attempt at humour, it might also have been a genuine question if the gentleman in question was very ill indeed.

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth adding that as a controlled drug, the morphine will have to have been prescribed by a doctor and in the circumstances most likely by the operating surgeon or his team for post operative pain relief.

 

If I was looking into this I'd be checking for parallel prescribing of some form of laxative. The obstruction in the gentlemans bowel is a worrying turn. Part of this complaint needs to look at whether any constipation was reported and what monitoring took place prior to discharge, were his bowel movements recorded I wonder? Was there any sign of impending issues prior to discharge?

 

Lots of questions to come I think to all involved.

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he was admitted to hospital for an open fracture of the wrist , he stayed in hospital only a short time , his bowels where working at that point , it was during the short time he spent in this rehabilitation centre where he was given morphine for the pain, as far as i'm aware, & no mention of laxatives being given , He told them that it would cause him problems but he was ignored, i'm not sure if he had reported being constipated at the rehab centre in the few days he was there, but within 24-36hrs following discharging himself (due to how he was treated) he was constipated and was vomiting it wasn't until he was re admitted to hospital and treated for a blocked bowel, due to the morphine ,and it was found that he is allergic to it, so whilst in hospital his pain relief was paracetamol from a drip along with i presume electrolytes and food supplements

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy, I think this really merits some proper investigation and by all accounts the health board concerns team are best placed to help with this. Getting details of exactly what was given and when, what was written in notes - it might also be worth contacting the gentleman's GP (you'll need his permission, of course) to see what info is on his file with regards to his adverse reaction to Morphine.

 

Allergies such as these may (and should) be held on the gentleman's GP record but of course, as the initial admission was an emergency these notes may not have been available to the teams working with him.

 

In all accounts it's difficult to comment much further without having the facts in front of us. I hope he makes a speedy recovery and that you get the answers you're looking for,

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found out that it wasn't the staff at the hospital who treated him for the fractured wrist, or his GP, but the resident gp at the so called rehabilitation unit who prescribed morphine, He was re admitted to hospital the other day due to the wound from surgery opening , a short time(several days) after the staples had been removed by the SRN who came to his home , Not sure what caused this ,but he is back in the hospital whilst it heals and he has re-gained his mobility and his home adapted ,bed & toilet raised to make it easier for him to get out of bed ect

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy, can't think why you'd go directly to the CQC. Start with Health Board if you don't wish to write to each place and then if you're unhappy with the response escalate to the PHSO.

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/complaint/

 

I don't think there is a health board in England ,they have one in Wales though , the info seems to be pointing to complaining to the hospital trust where he was admitted they also own/run the rehab unit, From what i can gather someone another friend has already or is going to complain to them , so i'll have to wait and see what transpires from that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...