Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arc Europe representing Arrow global for EGG - help please


hitchy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Think youll find thats "document" and the prescribed terms are on page 1. They just would have to show page1 links to page2 in some way.

 

Anyhow if we want to pick holes with the "agreement" then I would say 1) the Title of the agreement is wrong, it should be under "Fixed Sum Loan Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974" not "credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974" Also there appears to be no notice that this agreement is uncancellable so where is the right to cancel box.

 

And basically its a mess, although the prescribed terms appear to be there theyre not setup in the proper format as described in the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983

 

S.

 

Are you saying that the agreement is unenforceable, or is it a case that there is enough in the format to cover them?

I guess if i go to account in dispute i would have to clearly describe the reasons why, and i am still unsure what they are.

 

Is there a total charge for credit

 

lilly

 

Cant see anywhere total charge for credit, just monthly payment and APR and total loan.

Also some of the small print refers to T and C's but there are no t and c's attached.

Additionally there is no mention of cancellation rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a fixed sum (Loan) credit agreement the following are the prescribed terms:-

 

A Amount of credit

A term stating the amount of credit

 

B Repayments

A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following-

(a) Number of repayments;

(b) Amount of repayments;

© Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d) Dates of repayments;

(e) The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

As per 42Mans enforceable agreements thread here

 

I would read around some of the other EGG loan agreements section to see what has been suggested.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that the agreement is unenforceable, or is it a case that there is enough in the format to cover them?

I guess if i go to account in dispute i would have to clearly describe the reasons why, and i am still unsure what they are.

 

the items I've listed may be important but there not the prescribed terms, I think you need to look at similar agreements by other people with egg loans and see what has happened and how they recommend to proceed.

 

Follow this link to the EGG section ->> HERE I'm sure there will be others with the same loan documentation as you and probably further down the line so you can see what has happened if they put the account into dispute.

 

Oh and as crapstones comment suggests the dates on signatures? I assume document was drawn up with their signature already on it for you to counter-sign?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received agreement from Capquest on an Egg loan from 2002.

 

Can someone advise on legality of this, i am confused as to different regulations depending on the year. No T and C's included, my signature later than theirs. Not quite sure what should be included.

 

Will post docs when i work out how to remove personal details

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently cca'd capquest and got a copy of my agreement back with a letter asking how i intend to pay.

 

I have actually been paying them on a debt management plan.

 

Dont think they like the fact that i cca'd them and they have now added interest which is more than my last 12 months payments.

 

Be grateful for any advice on how to deal with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, the agreement seems to be enforceable.

 

You should write and remind tham that you are on a DMP and ask them to remove the interest they have added. THey probably won't but you need to ask

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I currently have a debt management program with the CCCS which i pay regularly and do not miss.

 

Seems like ARC have purchased one of the debts from EGG and have sent me the following letter.

 

Any advice on how to respond would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next thing you'll get is a letter from Trevor Munn threatening the legal action ARC make mention of, ARC and Trevor Munter are one and the same but both tend to be toothless.

 

In my experience I would write to egg direct informing them of ARC's somewhat dodgy tactics ( particularly if you're using the CCCS) and

see what next transpires.

 

There is plenty about Egg in the egg forum found here

 

Egg - The Consumer Forums

 

At the same time as this I would send ARC a cca request...egg generally tend to produce them but as to their enforceabilty..well that remains to be seen as I believe there is a case currently pending with egg that may set a precedent...see the egg forum.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick bit of info

It's against OFT Guidelines to request a payment by Credit Card

They should not encourage you to take out another debt to pay theirs

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick bit of info

 

It's against OFT Guidelines to request a payment by Credit Card

 

They should not encourage you to take out another debt to pay theirs

 

I never knew that!!

 

Every letter I or my wife receives generally has a list of credit cards which you can pay by..

 

Thanks for the tip - something I will remember when the next letter comes through.. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris

 

FYI

 

OFT Guidelines

 

Physical/Pyscological Harassment

 

2.5 Putting pressure on debtors or third parties is considered to be oppressive

 

2.6 Examples of unfair trading are as follows

 

b/ Pressurising debtors to sell property, to raise funds by further borrowing or to extend their borrowing

 

Hope that helps in the future but please don't forget that Debit Cards often have the same logos as Credit Cards so make sure the letter you receive actually mentions payment by credit card as the one in this post does

Edited by Revenant
Can't spell

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the responses. They have started leaving messages on my phone telling me it is most urgent that i call them. Think i will just pass to CCCS and ignore them.

Strictly speaking does buying a debt suddenly give them the right to chase for it? I dont have any contract with them, wont i create one if i start paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had a notice of assignment from Egg. If ARC has bought the debt then Egg should have sent you one. But I bet they haven't. They have about as much power as I have in demanding money from you.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think think this debt HAS been sold, it states in the letter "has been passed to us for collection".

 

This would seem to indicate EGG are just applying pressure through ARC to up the payments.

 

...and if the debt hasnt been sold then only EGG or ARC+EGG can take you to court, not ARC on their own.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had a notice of assignment from Egg. If ARC has bought the debt then Egg should have sent you one. But I bet they haven't. They have about as much power as I have in demanding money from you.

 

No notice of assignment received, think as Shadow says it might just be an attempt to gain more money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just to make you guys aware about ARC they seem to be doing things in thier own way not even following oft dca code or credit assosiation codes my own debt is an interesting example gaz v egg is a casing point.

 

1 had letter from ARC demanding payment

2 letter from trevor Munn

3 another letter from trevor munn saying procedings are being prepered

4 sent CCA request with £1.00 PO

5 this returned day after recived with letter refusing to pass this on to egg and I had to send a cheque guess i know why lifted signiture and debt will continue.... any thourghts folks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have a similar dance with T Munn ARC over egg cards you get a letter from supposedly munn send a rebuttal to him get a letter back from arc get a letter from munn and so on AEC clearly state theyare collecting on behalf of EGG and have not bought the debt, My view is since munn and ARC claim to be different but both are offering payment terms this contitutes being chased for the same debt by two agencies at the same time contrary to oft guidlines Munn wont reply even to resquest askijng if he will accept service .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I have received a letter from Arc which says it is following up on information i have received recently.

 

I have received no other letters so this is the only information.

 

They claim to represent Arrow Global for a loan which was originally with EGG back in 2003.

 

I did have an EGG loan which was part of a DMP with my ex wife and

 

my last recollection of any payment was in June 2013.

 

Im assuming Arrow have passed to Arc for collection and they have traced my new address.

 

They inform me that i am legally responsible.

 

Can someone advise how i should deal with this please?

 

 

By the way the debt is said to be around £5k which is more than i borrowed in 2003.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA REQUEST

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

numerous old threads merged for history.

 

 

is this debt on your credit file?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...