Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC & MKDP / Compello Group - threat of CCJ


Spike2014
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

 

Firstly apologies this is my first time posting, have had a good look around the site and am very impressed.

I've been able to kind of answer my question by studying other posts here but would appreciate peoples opinions if they have time.

 

I defaulted on a HSBC current account that was overdrawn in September 2009.

The amount was approx. £4000 and was mostly unfair charges from the bank.

I did attempt reclaiming charges prior to default but in the end just gave up, cowardly I know.

 

Since 2009 I've moved addresses a few times and had letters from Compello Group chasing this matter up.

 

Until now I've just ignored everything (possibly a stupid idea)

 

Lately the letters have been coming from MKDP arm of Compello and the latest one looks a little more serious. Its a fishing letter no mistake

 

"We have undertaken further investigation using Credit Reference Agencies

in addition to other reliable databases and understand you reside at this address"

goes on to say about an instruction to pre-legal department

and if the matter proceeds possible CCJ, Balliffs or Attachment of Earnings.

 

The matter would be Statute Barred by my calculation later this year (September 2015),

but have read on here firms like MKDP go for a CCJ to prevent it becoming SB ?

 

Should I go for it with the SAR, CCA letters do you think ?

Or am I just entering a big next of vipers ?!

 

Thanks folks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant CCA

its a bank account

 

 

I would suspect you have one of MKDP's

many threat-o-grams

that they send out as they know the account in approaching SB or its gone over

 

 

and they need to try and fleece you

but using every other word in the book bar WILL...anywhere.

 

 

read it CAREFULLY.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I would certainly be sending HSBC an sar get all the statements

or atleast get a spreadsheet knocked up using their OD int rate

and see where that leaves the balance.

 

 

if MKDP have only sent one letter so far

then I'd be keeping quiet where they are concerned.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi D

 

 

Have been receiving letters every 5 to 6 weeks from MKDP for approx. 18 months or so now. Have never replied and in the latest letter they still mention they are unsure i'm actually at this address.

 

 

Will definitely do the SAR request to HSBC

 

 

Thanks for your advice ! Not sure where this one will end up

 

 

thanks S

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Freeman of the land rubbish

 

You,be now alerted them and invited letter tennis

 

You should have kept quiet

 

Fotl rubbish is always doomed to fail

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old and new threads merged

 

So did you sar HSBC to get the statements as asked before?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The three letters are consistently a load of balls, I'm sorry to say. I assume you got them elsewhere.

 

They are correct, there is not required to be an executed agreement for a current account. The are legally exempt under s74 CCA1974.

 

Are you denying that the overdrafts in question were yours?

 

If so, then you should put them to proof is a more sensible manner, and perhaps progress things to the FOS if you are not satisfied with the proof.

 

If not, then dispute the validity of any charges that make them up if you think you have grounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, the three letters con!

 

You can completely ignore any FMOTL stuff when it comes to financial matters, believe me, it will only end up one way, and they will win.

 

Much better to play these at their own game.

 

Now depending on exactly what you said in these 3 letters, will depend whether or not you've reset the limitation clock.

 

Where these current accounts?

Overdrafts?

Loans?

 

As they were post 07 then they will more than likely be CCA compliant.

 

How much of these accounts are made up of reclaimable fees/charges?

 

Have you checked your credit files to see what is on there?

 

For the time being, I would stop poking them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were a combination of overdraft on a current account and a loan consolidated into 2 amounts (2 separate accounts) will post what I sent in the letter below

 

OK, have they amalgamated these accounts?

ie. lumped the overdraft in with the current account?

 

And is this two separate loans?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one was purely a current account that got overdrawn, that's the smaller one - £1900

 

 

The other was a current account that got overdrawn + a consolidated loan + a flexiloan in there too - £4700

 

 

thanks for replying on this folks

Link to post
Share on other sites

one was purely a current account that got overdrawn, that's the smaller one - £1900 How much of that is fees/charges? And have you reclaimed them yet?

 

The other was a current account that got overdrawn + a consolidated loan + a flexiloan in there too - £4700 Same applies here, reclaim any fees/charges on the current account. The consolidation loan when did you take that out? And the flexiloan, when did you take that out?

 

They CANNOT lump a current account and loans together, as they will have completely different T&C's interest rates, and charges, so if they have put them all into one, then the first thing to do is to tell them that if they fail to sparate them and treat them as individual debts then you will be reporting them to the FCA to investigate.

 

Was the current accounts planned overdrafts or unplanned?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duplicate threads merged

Again

Please keep to one thread

 

Fotl spiel needs removing in numerous posts

 

I.all do it later

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to look up managed loans. Threads here

 

Looks like HSBC dropped you in it

Then sold it all on

 

CCA is a must

As is an sar to hsbc

 

Their comms log usually trips them up

 

Non CCA and CCA stuff can't be merged

 

Dx

ally be

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...