Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Croydon leasehold and conveyance cover-up fraud


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The purpose of exposing the truth about this story will contribute to finding the truth so that justice can finally achieved for us and for other people in the similar situations. I do not have a big group of leaseholders behind me and hence I am completely isolated and silenced.

 

My home has been flooded for 10 years. I was deprived of any dignity in my own home. I experienced that silence to which I was constrained after a decade-long attack on my dignity as a human being before I was removed from my home with my evidence being ignored.

 

The only objective of any exposure is the search for truth. There is no place for the “politically correct.” in a system that privileges parasitic opportunists at the expenses of families and people that cannot defend themselves on equal grounds.

 

Anyone should be given the right to expose their side of the story according to the evidence available. I hope that consumeractiongroup will concede me this opportunity always with respect for the law and, of course, to relevant enquiries.

 

I am looking for urgent expertise and help by consumers who are knowledgeable about planning issues and conveyancing.

 

Some details of my story are available here: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/conversion_in_eight_flats_at_34

 

if anyone bothers to follow the link and read up to the bottom I will then ask few urgent questions,

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Homeless Gullyver

 

An isolated and silenced leaseholder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a question you would like answered or any advice you seek ?

 

Your post appears to be a bit of a rant, and the phrase "if any bothers to follow the link" is hardly friendly, the linked post was very long and I think many like me wont have time to read to the bottom as you suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for making me notice the not-so-much-friendly wording I use. Please forgive me. I am under strong distress because I became homeless at the beginning of January 2015. In brief I lost my home and I am homeless now after a decade of living in my home constantly affected by flooding from defective roof and pipes. Here a short video

of the sort of leaks I lived constantly for 10 years.

 

When I bought this leasehold flat the structural survey I had arranged suggested to double check with the conveyance solicitor that the building had full building regulation approval. But when I had the conveyance report from my conveyance solicitor in 2005 he recommended we purchased the property and he found nothing wrong with the planning situation of the building.

 

In 2014, after 9 years of ongoing leaks and service charges robbery (£26,000.00 in the last two years alone for major roof repairs and other major repairs) I went desperate to the planning dep. of the local council to print a copy of the completion certificate to sell the flat.

 

This is when I discovered that 50% of the conversion flats in our building do not have the required Building Control approval and only three flats were signed off with completion certificates issued Building Control holds no design or construction information of any of these properties including the roof structure and any structural engineer’s letter or calculations. Council records do not indicate which flats these certificates relate to.

 

I had confirmation that 1) my flat does not have a completion certificate 2) the title is defective 3) there was a defective title indemnity insurance of which my conveyance solicitor was informed but he did not mention anything to me. 4) there are two of these 9 conversions which appear nowhere in the any planning or building notice application of the local council which means that 2 of these conversion have been registered at the Land Registry with leases created out of nowhere. The Land Registry has also confirmed that the lease of my flat has a missing page, the same that is missing in my lease (strange coincidence).

 

The lenders refused to provide a full copy of the lease and to comment the situation. This makes me believe that they also do not have a full copy of the lease and that they were informed about the defective title and indemnity insurance of which I was not told. Finally, the flat was sold as a converted flat but I found out that in reality it is registered as an HMO multiple dwelling occupancy property because it does not comply with the building regulations.

 

Basically, the freeholder converted (or acquired) the building from two houses in 9 converted flats and not only did not regularise the situation with the council but also did not declare the true material facts in my conveyance. In actual fact, no one of those whom bought their flats in this building was told about the true situation of the building. No one would have been crazy to buy if they had known.

 

After six years living with home flooded heavily I lost my jobs for the distress of my appalling housing situation and legal abuse endured to ask for the repairs to the point that I lost the home and became homeless. I incurred in substantive financial loss and costs.

 

Who is now responsible for this situation?

 

I am grateful for any advise.

Edited by Gullyver
Grammar correction
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your isues are beyond my experience but ill add:-

 

1. The original conveyance would be responsible for any false information given to you, it maybe possible to sue him.

 

2. The freeholder is responsible for the maintenance of the building, whether this includes the flooding problems is hard to say, it depends where the flooding came from, in either way there should be insurance in place to cover this (normally the lease states that the FH is responsible for arranging this).

 

Id suggest getting some professional help from a solicitor (legal aid ?), or CAB or visit LEASE site (http://www.lease-advice.org/).

 

YOU should have a copy of the lease, not the lender, that is your contract between you and the FH, if you don't, you should get one ASAP, ask the FH for a copy or you can buy it from the land Registry Website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...