Jump to content


Need Advice please re agreement from solicitors


leilani
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can those who are familiar with legally binding documents please look over this agreement?

 

 

I am meant to sign by 23rd Jan.

 

 

I am uncomfortable with the whole issue,

 

 

but even more with the agreement as it appears to have commas in which I always understood could lead to ambiguity.

 

I have also included previous correspondence on the issue.

 

Would appreciate advice,

 

 

many thanks in advance. :)

Edited by leilani
Seems to be duplicating
Link to post
Share on other sites

The original is a Ltd company and has been up and running since 2010 whereas you registered in 2013. It would appear as if you are trying to use a similar name so you can gain business from the original Ltd company.

 

 

There have been many cases similar to yours go to court and it is very rare for the original owner to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have taken a look at the undertaking for you and it looks clear to me. I can't see a problem if you agree not to use any domain name including the word "trust" in connection with sitting services.

 

The use of commas seems fine - commas can give rise to ambiguity when used carelessly but I don't think there is any ambiguity in this case.

 

Personally I would delete the words "for passing off" in the second paragraph - this should cover all claims, not only passing off claims (to be fair I'm not sure what other claims there could be but better to be comprehensive).

 

I would also replace "High Court of Justice" with "courts of England & Wales" since I don't think that all possible claims would necessarily fall under the jurisdiction of the High Court.

 

I would also add a signature block for the claimant saying "Accepted and Agreed ... Signature ... Name ... Date".

 

To be fair, I don't think these changes are essential and on balance I would probably just sign the damn thing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for Steampowered and Conniff, as 3 of the documents have been removed, not sure your getting the full picture. Only mine left.

 

Beginning to dislike this site, shall not be guiding people to here any more.

 

Please remove my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

leilani, the only person who has removed any documents is yourself - that is evident from the edit comment you made in the first post where you state it "seems to be duplicating".

 

All your documents appear to be in the one pdf and I cant see anything missing.

 

If you wish I can close the thread for you, but I fail to see why you would want this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitors letter seems to lack precision but is clear in its intent. If you sign you would be precluded from appending the word TRUST to any other words (or combination) that refer to sitting services.

 

So you could use trusted-dogwalking, trusted-house-cleaning. But not trusted-house-sitting-uk for instance.

 

The fact that you have selected exactly the same name, but with a .co.uk instead of a .com TLD makes me think that this will end poorly for you if it gets to court.

 

I don't see anything objectionable in the letter. Personally I would sign it and transfer the domain and use the money to purchase a new domain with an imaginative name that avoids the word trust and that nobody else has the .com equivalent for. Anything else risks a fair bit of stress and possibly a hefty costs bill if you lose.

 

Sorry that this may not be what you want to hear, but it may be better to take the compromise at this point and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for Steampowered and Conniff, as 3 of the documents have been removed, not sure your getting the full picture. Only mine left.

 

Beginning to dislike this site, shall not be guiding people to here any more.

 

Please remove my account.

 

 

you posted 4 single page scans of 3.4mb each

they were merged into one 4 page doc of 200kb

 

 

all the pages are there

 

 

large files make downloading very slow

 

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...