Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft Halifax CCA not signed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I currently have 3 credit card debts which have been defaulted and are now with DCA's

and have been paying them off to varying degrees for 5 ish years.

 

I'm in the position where I can offer reasonable Full and final settlements,

so decided to send CCA requests to them all to hopefully help me with the negotiation.

 

Moorcroft initially wrote back saying that they had suspended the account whist they found the terms and that I didn't need to pay.

 

This is a Halifax card that was taken out in 2004 and defaulted in April 2010.

MY CRA shows it as settled with Halifax in June 2014 and now shows as Cabot with the same default date.

 

Now I've had a response back from Moorcroft who have sent 2 reconstituted(?) CCA's,

one for my previous and one for my current address.

Neither are signed or dated or have anywhere to sign or date.

They also both state that "we will decide your credit limit and tell you what it is". i.e. no credit limit

 

They've also included the letter from Halifax which states that "a copy of their signed application form will be sent under separate cover".

 

Now they are saying that they've complied with my request and I need to pay.

 

My query is,

am I right in thinking that because it's pre 2007,

I can go back to them and say that it's unenforceable until such time as they produce a signed

and dated CCA and also because there's no credit limit?

 

 

Or do nothing on the same basis?

 

 

The plan being to hold out and then start the f&f process.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

recons are no good

yes they 'comply' but not for court purposes.

 

 

no need to tell them anything

 

 

cabot will write you now antway

 

 

Moorcroft were chasing for the OC

 

 

they can be ignored now cabot has it [they are not linked]

 

 

await cabots new move

 

 

all very well trying to pay the debt off by F&F

 

 

but it will do bugger all for your credit rating.

 

 

waste of money

 

 

the default is there for 6yrs paid or not.

 

 

have you lookedat PPI and penalty charges reclaiming?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a copy of my original signed terms back from Moorcroft. On my CRA this debt shows as Cabot.

 

I've attached the signed terms plus the single page that was attached (not dated but signed in 2004, a copy of terms in my current address and a copy of terms in my previous address (where I lived where I applied).

 

Any advice as to whether the signed form plus single page of terms changes anything re enforcability please?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see how page 2 T&C's are the reverse of the application form

and even if they were its an application form!

 

 

await the sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Quick update. I've had a reply to the SAR, stating that they don't hold any information other than my details and amount owed. Therefore, they've returned my postal order on that basis that I need to SAR Cabot.

 

So no more contact with Moorcroft then! I'll SAR Cabot and see what comes back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot rarely ever have the correct CCA. Food for thought ;)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick update - I've had a letter from Moorcroft saying that they've been asked by Cabot to stop collecting on this account on their behalf and to refer to Cabot if I have any future queries.

 

No response to the Halifax SAR yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot wont have the paperwork. What cabot will do ( instead of admitting the debt is uncollectable), is pass it around every DCA they can, hoping they break you down and you pay.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore till statute barred.

 

Not wise advice at all. Cabot will go to court if they think they can get judgement by default. If they dont, then they will sell it to someone who will. Ignoring a debt until SB is not a good idea.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...