Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Uk Debts in Namibia


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I left the UK in September 2013 with CC debts and a loan and moved to Namibia, with my Namibian wife, where I had a job lined up.

 

I continued to pay my debts from Namibia when I arrived there until January 2014.

 

The reason I stopped paying, the job never materialised and by January all our savings were gone.

 

I spoke to my UK bank LLoyds TSB at the time, and CC companies, Capital One and Asda Money to tell them what happened and they kept in touch via email with me until around April of 2014, then suddenly nothing.

 

Could it mean they have stopped chasing these debts I owe?

 

My intention is to claim Bankruptcy in the UK, as I have no way of paying these debts off completely, but living in a third world country it's difficult to save the £750 to pay for this. I hate the fact that I have to resort to this as a solution.

 

I have been told by the CAB in the UK there is no reciprocal agreement between the UK and Namibia, but I don't know what this implies.

 

Any advice would be welcome....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No reciprocal agreement means that even if they got a court judgement in the UK against you, they could not enforce this in Namibia. I think they would struggle to even chase the debt in Namibia. All that will happen is that Lloyds TSB, Cap1, Asda etc will continue to apply defaults to your credit record in the UK, they will continue applying charges plus higher interest. They may also be sending letters to your last UK address in the hope these are being forwarded to you.

 

After a period of time, these creditors will sell your debts on to Debt Collection Agencies who will write to your last UK address, to which they won't get a response. I doubt they would be informed of you living in Namibia. They may obtain a UK court judgement in your absence and hope that at some point they trace you in the UK to gain payment.

 

So what can you do. All that you should do at this stage, is to confirm that you are a permanent resident of Namibia and are not in a position to service the accounts. Then say that you hope your position will improve and you will be back in contact when it does.

 

If you are never likely to be able to pay the debts, then yes it does make sense to return to the UK to file for bankruptcy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info unclebulgaria67

 

It would appear a DCA has managed to contact my wife, I guess they saw her Linkedin profile, and they are attempting to set up an agreement with her, they even suggested that our combined wages should have enough funds to be able to set up an agreement. They have no idea what it's like paying N$17.5 to the pound.

 

The DCA is from the UK and when it was mentioned that the plan was to declare Bankruptcy, they paused, and then suggested a re-payment plan. I guess they will be looking to offload this account pretty quickly if they operate like most DCA's appear to.

 

The creditors all know we moved to Namibia, so I guess they sold on the debts.

 

It looks like bankruptcy is the only option for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info unclebulgaria67

 

It would appear a DCA has managed to contact my wife, I guess they saw her Linkedin profile, and they are attempting to set up an agreement with her, they even suggested that our combined wages should have enough funds to be able to set up an agreement. They have no idea what it's like paying N$17.5 to the pound.

 

The DCA is from the UK and when it was mentioned that the plan was to declare Bankruptcy, they paused, and then suggested a re-payment plan. I guess they will be looking to offload this account pretty quickly if they operate like most DCA's appear to.

 

The creditors all know we moved to Namibia, so I guess they sold on the debts.

 

It looks like bankruptcy is the only option for us.

 

If the debts are in your name and not in your wifes name they should not have contacted her. It would be a breach of your Data Protection rights.

 

If you & your wife are resident in Namibia there is nothing that you need to do at this stage, if you have no assets in the UK. Entering into a repayment arrangement when you are struggling financially would not be a sensible thing to do. Any money that you paid would probably not even cover the charges and interest being added to the acccounts.

 

Just wait until you are able to go bankrupt in the UK and come back to the UK to apply for this. If you are not likely to return to the UK to live at any point, you may opt to do nothing.

 

If these debts are fairly recent, the debt collection agency who contacted your wife may be part of the Bank you had the account with.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again for your advice, it is very much appreciated.

 

We have no plans to return to the UK other than for Holidays and Family visits, however, I am not sure what the consequences would be if we simply did nothing.

 

Does a debt such as this ever get 'written off' by the creditor? Would I be looking over my shoulder for the next however many years.....

 

I have read somewhere that debts may be written off after a period of 6 years, or become Statue Barred, but I'm not sure this is enitirely true, if at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell creditors your new permanent address if not done already. Prevents legal action in UK succeeding.

 

Stop writing after that. No more contact at all.

 

After 6 years all default markers disappear from your credit file and debts become statute barred, except mortgages 12 years.

 

Banks sell to debt purchasers when they've given up hope but you simply have to ride out the 6 years as above from date of last written contact to original creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again for your advice, it is very much appreciated.

 

We have no plans to return to the UK other than for Holidays and Family visits, however, I am not sure what the consequences would be if we simply did nothing.

 

Does a debt such as this ever get 'written off' by the creditor? Would I be looking over my shoulder for the next however many years.....

 

I have read somewhere that debts may be written off after a period of 6 years, or become Statue Barred, but I'm not sure this is enitirely true, if at all.

 

They can't do much when you are in Namibia. Would have no impact on you, unless a Bank or employer in Namibia wanted you to provide details of your UK credit record. You can visit the UK without any issues, as debt is purely a civil issue.

 

What tends to happen is that creditors conveniently don't notice that a debtor has moved abroad and then at some point they may apply for a court judgement using your last known UK address. You would obviously not know anything about this. But the important thing is to get your creditors to confirm in writing that they have noted that you are a resident in Namibia. Getting such confirmation is gold dust, as you can use it if necessary in the future, if you needed to get a court judgement set side. Set aside in your situation means to ask a court to remove their judgement because the creditor obtained the judgement knowing you were resident abroad.

 

If a creditor did say obtain a court judgement after 5 years of you not paying the debt, they would then have 6 years from the date of the judgement to collect the debt. So you would have a period of 11 years when the debt could be enforced in the UK. If you never intend to come back to the UK or not for a long time, then you might choose to not bother with bankruptcy. If you are likely to come back to the UK within the next 10 years you might decide that bankruptcy is the best option for a clean start.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would write to each creditor using Registered mail informing them you are now permanently living in Namibia and do not currently have the means to service your debts. Inform them that if you should, at some time in the future, return to the UK you will contact them to negotiate the repayment of your liabilities.

 

After about three to four weeks fill in the forms Namib Post will give you to trace lost/missing Registered mail and you will eventually (after several more weeks) get proof the item was signed for, when and by whom - which is then your proof that they knew you were permanently resident in Namibia. This should prevent any unknown CCJ's being registered in your name - and if they are getting them set aside should not be a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...