Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rail ticket machines to show passengers how to get cheapest tickets... with a sticky label!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Train companies are being forced to offer commuters the cheapest rail fares possible, following criticism that passengers can pay an excess of £100 when purchasing tickets at self-service machines instead of paying at a ticket counter.

 

The changes, which are expected to be implemented by March, are aimed at ending the anomaly in prices available at the counter, where staff have access to a complex database of fares, discounts and promotions, and the more limited options in a self-service machines.

 

Some machines have been found to promote expensive fares, bury cheaper options and do not apply discounts for groups or families, leading to a difference in train prices of up to £100, according to the Daily Telegraph.

 

As a first step, they must label all self-service machines by March to warn passengers they could save money by using the counter service.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rail-bosses-told-to-show-passengers-how-to-get-cheapest-tickets-9952838.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if there is any better system, – I'd like to know – however, I always use The Train Line http://www.thetrainline.com/ when booking my tickets and I think that I get very good deals

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought all online booking sites, including those of TOCs, used same system, offering same deals as each other - and as station ticket offices. I stand to be corrected if not.

 

Whilst counter staff should offer cheapest deals, I know for a fact that they routinely do not offer wheelchair users concessions they are entitled to. I find that disgraceful, even if down to staff ignorance - which in turn is also a disgrace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trainline is always the most expensive, without exception. They charge booking fees and some card fees for the exact same train tickets obtainable at other sites!

 

Arriva Trains Wales website uses exactly the same "Trainline" software, except there's no fees!

 

East Midlands Trains offer a £1 discount on their own Advance tickets, and again don't charge any extra fees etc.

 

East Coast also offer all the available fares, again with a discount on their own fares, (marked by a * ). No fees either!

 

Virgin Trains use the "Trainline" software too, again, they don't charge booking fees, but Virgin sometimes "filter" out their competitors cheapest fares, (London Midland).

 

There really should be a campaign by this very forum to encourage people to abandon the trainline! Use Arriva Trains Wales, (exactly same fares available, and same trainline software), but no fees!

 

It's only RailEasy and Trainline which charge fees! Booking with any Train Operating Company allows you to get the exact same fares, but without the fees!

 

People should simply go to the National Rail website http://www.nationalrail.co.uk, enter in their journey details and passenger info (railcards etc), and then it will tell you the best prices available and then direct you to the most appropriate company to book through, that don't charge fees!

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually I found [until I was perm in Scotland]

I travelled lon scot 7 times a year

 

 

used trainline to find the route number then put

that in scotrail

 

 

once I found out the trick

I got cheap cheap fares

 

 

I once got [by advanced booking] £32 RETURN Stansted - far ne Scotland

next time did it for £58 3 mts later.

 

 

this was 2012 mind.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually I found [until I was perm in Scotland]

I travelled lon scot 7 times a year

 

 

used trainline to find the route number then put

that in scotrail

 

 

once I found out the trick

I got cheap cheap fares

 

 

I once got [by advanced booking] £32 RETURN Stansted - far ne Scotland

next time did it for £58 3 mts later.

 

 

this was 2012 mind.

 

 

dx

 

The point is that the Trainline doesn't have special access to "cheap" fares. All of the fares displayed on trainline are available no matter which train company you book with, except the train companies (bar Merseyrail) won't charge you any booking/card fees to do so!

 

The Trainline only does so well because of it's advertising campaign, which makes people think they have special access to cheap fares, or that they are somehow the cheapest etc.

 

Whether you book by phone, internet or at the station, the majority of the fares are the same. At stations, you get an even wider range of fares and special offers (ranger/rover tickets etc), which aren't available anywhere else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...