Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Redwood/harwoods - school fees. Claimforn received - *** Settled by Tomlin Order* **


Ironic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Received a call from unknown number just before Christmas asking me to ring a number to discuss a matter - I didn't.

 

Today have received a letter from Redwood Collections whose number it turns out was the one I was requested to ring.

 

Letter is below, and is all they have sent to me,

but my request for assistance from CAG (legends!)is what should be my first step with dealing with them,

 

who I have never heard of or dealt with,

as yes I dispute the whole debt for myriad reasons,

 

but I want to be seen to be doing the right thing by replying to them

- without listing all the reasons for disputing it at this point.

 

I am not ringing them it will be a letter but what should I actually say in it - preferably to kill it stone dead asap!

 

thanks for assistance

 

According to the public record you are registered at this address.

 

As we are unaware of any dispute in this matter,

it is our intention to instruct a process server to attend your address

for the purpose of serving you with a Statutory Demand issued

under the Insolvency Act 1986 (Bankruptcy).

 

Should you consider you have valid grounds for non-payment,

we invite you to contact us immediately to discuss the same within seven days from the date of this letter.

 

Should you fail to contact us and subsequently raise a dispute following the service of a Statutory Demand,

acopy of this letter will be produced to demonstrate to the court that every effort has been made to resolve this matter amicably.

 

Please be aware that should you become bankrupt any assets that you may have will be at risk.

 

This may include the sale of your house by the Trustee in bankruptcy to settle this matter where appropriate.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Enforcement Department

 

Our company has the sole control of your account.

 

Payment must be sent to this office.

 

DO NOT PAY A DOORSTEP COLLECTOR,

without first gaining our authority.

Edited by Ironic
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Normally Id ignore. But for purposes, Id ring them and get information. A phone call is much quicker than anything else.

Make sure you withhold your number so you still have some privacy at least...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, want in writing what they actually have, if anything, and phone calls do seem to at times to have things said

but 'conveniently' forgotten down line!

 

So want to respond as per their letter in timeframe but not accept/acknowledge the alleged debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine.

.. The idea of the phone call is for you to get the information

, not for them to "conveniently forget".

 

Only reason i said ring them is because of their demand to issue a Stat Demand...

 

I know redwood from another couple of forums and they are a pain..

. They literally just send a notice they have the account

then a few days later just send a process server round...

 

Send a prove it letter from the library if you can access it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry didn't mean to say wasn't a good idea ringing,

 

 

but thought it would make sense to get in writing their version of events.

 

 

I do like the prove it letter idea and have just looked at the library - nice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much is this alleged debt for?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then my first thought would be that for a low life DCA to buy this debt and for the OC to sell it on without taking court action themselves,

then theres something seriously not right.

 

 

I would hesitate from ringing them though.

 

 

I would send them a prove it letter.

 

 

If they ignore it and try to get a stat dec filed,

 

 

they would be very stupid indeed.

 

Remember, theyve only phoned once in a phishing attempt, and are now trying to scare you.

 

 

Even though they havent even confirmed you are there.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldnt look good for a DCA trying to BR you though. They havent even attempted to tell you what the debt is for. And they are saying there arent aware of any reason for non payment? Silly muppets.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's will try every trick in the book to get you to give them money. Remember, they buy debts in bulk, and maybe pay 10% of the face value for it. If that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a nasty letter and clearly you are dealing with a lowlife DCA. They need a robust response.

 

I would send a prove it letter and strictly stay off the phone. The sharper and more "to the point" the better.

 

Prepare for a SD, beginning now. SAR the original creditor for the info you will need to defend it.

 

You didn't say what sort of debt this is. Please let us know that, so we can better advise you after they respond to your letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a sort through various letters received over Christmas period and have found one from C W Harwood (solicitors)

dated 22nd December (nice) which now I've read

 

 

it says that their agents for this debt,

which is apparently unpaid school fees, is Redwood.

 

 

It goes on to say that if Redwood don't hear from me they will issue County Court proceedings

and they will then seek court fees and solicitors costs and interest at 8% per annum.

 

 

Also says if the court awards a judgement against me then it may adversely affect my credit rating.

 

So if the solicitor is saying County Court

 

 

how come Redwood are screaming SD and Bankruptcy?

 

 

That really doesn't seem right does it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

redwoods and Harwoods are a bunch of fleecers that send scary letters - end of.

 

read the letter CAREFULLY

 

nowhere does it say WILL.?

 

if the school fees are 'owed'

 

then its for the school to issues an SD or CCJ

or 'through' someone. like harwoods

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good

what is the issue wit the school and the fees then?

 

 

might be better to deal directly with them?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When financial crash we were on our a**es,

 

 

had to take kids out of the school,

 

 

unpaid fees were the result and that was some time ago.

 

 

We had various issues with the school but heard nothing else after they said they would pass the paperwork to Veale Wasbrough our debt recovery solicitors.

 

 

That was circa 4 years ago and nothing until letter from C W Harwood pre Christmas

Link to post
Share on other sites

When financial crash we were on our a**es,

 

 

had to take kids out of the school,

 

 

unpaid fees were the result and that was some time ago.

 

 

We had various issues with the school but heard nothing else after they said they would pass the paperwork to Veale Wasbrough our debt recovery solicitors.

 

 

That was circa 4 years ago and nothing until letter from C W Harwood pre Christmas

 

When did you actually default on payment to the school ? Is the debt coming up to being statute barred ?

 

Have the school actually sold the debt ? Any notice of assignment received ?

 

Any reasons to complain to the school ?

 

Are the school fees being asked for correct ? Have you ever received a detailed invoice for the school fees that are owed ?

 

What are the terms of the contract you signed with the school ? Did you have to pay them the whole of the term or year, if your child was taken out of the school ?

 

Suggest that you don't make any contact with anyone chasing this debt until you are absolutely sure what you are doing.

 

If this debt is not statute barred, the amount is correct and there are no reasons to dispute the debt, it might just be a case of coming to some payment arrangement with whoever owns the debt. This will be based on what you can reasonably afford. If you entered into such an arrangement, it should stop any CCJ or bankuptcy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When - I am trying to go through records and find out, which will also determine if statute barred or not, fingers crossed yes!

School sold debt - don't know, or know how to find out if they have. No notice of assignment received.

 

 

Complaints to school - yes but these were shelved as all was quiet

 

 

Amount of fees 'owed' correct - no definitely not and never received a detailed invoice

 

 

Terms were a Term in advance, and generally if child taken out of school they kept payment received.

 

 

So if I don't reply to the Redwoods letter and they do go to SD what options would I then have for course of action?

 

 

I also need to find out dates re statute barred - and also precise definition of when the six years starts

Link to post
Share on other sites

When - I am trying to go through records and find out, which will also determine if statute barred or not, fingers crossed yes!

School sold debt - don't know, or know how to find out if they have. No notice of assignment received.

 

 

Complaints to school - yes but these were shelved as all was quiet

 

 

Amount of fees 'owed' correct - no definitely not and never received a detailed invoice

 

 

Terms were a Term in advance, and generally if child taken out of school they kept payment received.

 

 

So if I don't reply to the Redwoods letter and they do go to SD what options would I then have for course of action?

 

 

I also need to find out dates re statute barred - and also precise definition of when the six years starts

 

You need to know when you went into default on this debt, as that will dictate your approach to this.

 

If not statute barred, if you have no evidence that the school does not own the debt, it is in your interest to start an official complaint with the school. With an ongoing complaint which you can evidence, you can show this to a court that there is an ongoing dispute and they might not want to get involved, as there is no resolution yet to the dispute. *** Important*** Register the complaint with the school before any statutory demand is likely to be served on you. This will be in your favour.

 

Why has the school not sent you a detailed invoice. Again another reason you can use, as to why the court should not be involved, when the school failed to provide a full invoice.

 

Study the terms of your contract with the school about payment in regard to statute barring. Also what rules the school had at the time. What was the schools policy. i.e would they have removed a child from the school when payment had not be made say 1 month after the due date.

 

Even if you receive the SD, you can enter into a dispute and make some token payment based on affordability. You would still need to apply for a set aside of the SD, as if you don't then they can use the SD to petition for your bankruptcy later on.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...