Jump to content


Defendant has filed a defence but not signed statement of truth


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have issued a claim on MCOL and the defendant has filed a defence on an additional sheet of paper which has been signed and dated, but he has not signed the statement of truth or given his date of birth or an address.

 

Is the defence a legal document as he has made statements which I have documentary evidence are untrue. Surely they will be in trouble in court for telling blatant lies?

 

Thank you for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wanted you could object to the defence in that it is not properly prepared. However, to a certain extent it's a bit of a technicality.

 

I'm not sure what you mean – is it a legal document – but my suggestion is that if you really do have documented evidence that what he is saying in his defence is untrue – and very importantly that he knows it's untrue, then I would keep quiet about this until the court hearing.

 

I would then raise the issue of his defence and ask him if he is sure about what he's saying in it – and even refer specifically to the points which is making and which you know are untrue. When he confirms in front of the judge that yes what he has said is correct, you can then produce the documents that you have and ask him – why, then do the documents that you have contradict what he is now saying in court.

 

You should have three copies of the document – one for him one for the judge and one for yourself.

 

If he objects to the fact that you haven't disclosed your evidence before the hearing, I think that it would be reasonable to say that as it is clear evidence of his dishonesty you felt that it was better to raise it at the trial and not before

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could have filed separate particulars if there was not enough space...this should be stated within the particulars on MCOL...serving seperate particulars is covered here CPR 3.1 (2):-

 

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part16/pd_part16

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...