Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carphone Warehouse - Faulty Tablet - Help Needed ASAP!


Soo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I brought a tablet computer at the start of Jan 2014 from a large phone shop.

 

 

After only 3.5months (the middle of April 2014) it developed a fault.

 

 

I took it straight back to the seller/shop and they sent it for repair.

(the tablet has a booklet stating a 24month warranty.)

 

 

It's now happened again (middle of Dec 2014) with the same fault.

 

 

I took the device back to the shop and they again sent it for repair but

on returning home the device still isn't working.

 

 

I'd like some advice before I go into the shop on what to say and where I stand legally etc.

-Am I entitled to a refund or replacement as I've already accepted a repair twice and this hasn't fixed the issue?-

 

 

I've heard they're only responsible upto 6months after buying the item,

after that it's down to the owner.

 

 

Does this still apply when the original fault occured only 3.5months after purchase with the same fault recoccuring 7.5months later?-

 

 

This will seem petty, but I've heard of consequential loss, could this be applied to travel expenses?

 

 

So far it's cost £20 in travel fares for a device brought for £80. I have 2 of the receipts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I brought it from Carphone Warehouse. It's only just over 11months old and 3weeks have been wasted with it being taken away for repair.Thanks for anymore help you can offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Soo

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened (purchased tablet), how they have let you down (it's faulty it's been in for repair twice already when you've really needed it) and what you want them to do (replace or refund the tablet - compensation for consequential loss - travel).

 

Send it to:-

 

Mr Graham Stapleton

Chief Executive

Carphone Warehouse UK

[email protected]

 

Let us know what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to go back to the shop now (hense the asap in the title-lol) and see what they say.

 

 

I'm not holding my breath though.

 

 

They said the second time that they'd 'flashed' the device.

 

 

I do have all the receipts including the purchase receipt,

 

 

the April repair recepit and the December receipt and they're all dated.

 

 

If I get no joy then I'll try an email/letter but I

 

 

hate that as you're just left waiting and it's even worse over Christmas and everything takes longer!

 

 

Thanks for your help and info Conniff and Rebel11. I'll let you know how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you still haven't told us what the fault is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Bank Fodder. The tablet won't come on.

 

 

The charger is in two parts, the square block that goes into the wall and the wire which goes from the block to the tablet,

you can then disconnect the wire from the square plug and use it to plug into the usb on your computer.

 

 

when it's plugged into the usb port of the computer or the wall nothing happens,

you don't even get the little battery symbol to show it's plugged in

and when it's connected to the computer there is no response as if nothing is plugged in.

 

 

They gave me a new wire to try but

 

 

I told them I knew it wasn't the wire as I have a Samsung mp3 player (Samsung is the make of tablet aswell)

and it has the same charger so I used the charger on the mp3 player

and that was recognised by the computer and started charged when plugged into the wall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the shop and they wouldn't give me a refund or an exchange.

 

 

They said they'd only send it in for repair again.

 

 

I explained that it's been in twice with the same fault so it's an issue with the machine.

Manager spoke with a woman in head office who said they wouldn't do a refund or replacement.

I then spoke to the woman and said that as I've brought it in twice for repair I think I've been reasonable

and allowed them to try and fix it.

 

 

I read out this thing I found on the net.".

.if you discover a fault then you are entitled to have the item repaired or replaced free of charge

- provided you did not cause the damage.

 

 

If the fault occurs within the first 6 months of owning the item it is accepted that the fault was there when you brought it.

In general, the seller can offer to repair the item first. This should be a permanent repair and the problem should no reoccur.

If the same fault occurs again, then you should be entitled to a replacement or refund.

 

 

If you are not happy with the retailers offer to repair the item, you can say 'no'

but if you do this, you may have to use the small claims procedure"

 

 

To me it's the same fault which has occurs again so it can't have been a permenant fix.

 

 

I also read the SOGA bit which says

"if these remedies take an unreasonable length of timje or cause you significant inconvience or do not resolve the problem,

you are still entitled to a refund"

- but she said that I was getting that wrong.

 

 

I ended up sending it back in for repair but asked if the phone call was recorded as I stated that I wouldn't be happy bring it back again in March

and then June and so on.

 

 

Also asked staff to put additional notes for the repair staff to state that this will be the 3rd time in for repair

so they are aware and there's also a note telling them there's additional info with the woman from head office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you issue a small claim you will find that they will start listening to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi soo

 

You were worried about getting this matter resolved before Christmas,

now this is going to drag on for at least another month,

their workshops will have a backlog.

Now they have got the tablet back,

send the email as suggested to the CEO.

Ask for a refund, see what they offer.

 

I went to the shop and they wouldn't give me a refund or an exchange. They said they'd only send it in for repair again. I explained that it's been in twice with the same fault so it's an issue with the machine. Manager spoke with a woman in head office who said they wouldn't do a refund or replacement.I then spoke to the woman and said that as I've brought it in twice for repair I think I've been reasonable and allowed them to try and fix it. I read out this thing I found on the net."..if you discover a fault then you are entitled to have the item repaired or replaced free of charge - provided you did not cause the damage. If the fault occurs within the first 6 months of owning the item it is accepted that the fault was there when you brought it. In general, the seller can offer to repair the item first. This should be a permanent repair and the problem should no reoccur. If the same fault occurs again, then you should be entitled to a replacement or refund. If you are not happy with the retailers offer to repair the item, you can say 'no' but if you do this, you may have to use the small claims procedure"To me it's the same fault which has occurs again so it can't have been a permenant fixture.I also read the SOGA bit which says "if these remedies take an unreasonable length of timje or cause you significant inconvience or do not resolve the problem, you are still entitled to a refund" - but she said that I was getting that wrong. I ended up sending it back in for repair but asked if the phone call was recorded as I stated that I wouldn't be happy bring it back again in March and then June and so on. Also asked staff to put additional notes for the repair staff to state that this will be the 3rd time in for repair so they are aware and there's also a note telling them there's additional info with the woman from head office.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update

 

 

I got a voicemail to say the tablet was ready to be picked up.

 

 

I went to the shop today and the assistant got the tablet from the storeroom.

 

 

In the past it's been in a fabric zip bag as I have the original box (they didn't take the box from me on any occasion, only the device)

and they take it out the bag to show you and give it you back.

 

 

This time however it was in a clean box... a new box!

 

 

After about 5minutes of the assitant trying to get something printed out on the computer

I asked if it was a new tablet (I wasn't sure, it could've been my old one in the box!) and

 

 

she said "yes".No one had mentioned this in the store or on the voicemail that it was going to a replacement, which I'm glad about.

 

 

Hopefully, touch wood, fingers crossed and all that, that this one will be ok.

 

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

 

P.S. - I've heard of Consequential Loss,

this is what I got "you are entitled to claim damages from the trader to cover your losses if they were caused as a direct result of the goods being faulty..."

 

 

Does anyone think I could have a claim?

As they've replaced the tablet with a new one

could this be proof that the tablet was indeed faulty as I claimed?

 

 

It's cost me in total £24.20 to travel to and from the store by bus (5x£4.00 and 1x£4.20)

these were day travel tickets but that was/is the cheapest way to get there, singles there and back would have been £2.10 each way..

 

 

I have 3 of the bus tickets but obviously not the ones from April 2014 and one from December.

 

 

I've got the replacement which is what I wanted all along so don't know whether to cut my losses,

but £24.20 is a lot of money to me especially when the product was only £79

so the travel is over 20% of the cost of the product!

Plus I had no need to go to the store other than the faulty product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...