Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Employee Not Giving Me P45


leeward30
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, All

 

I have not received my P45 from my employee from over a year ago. I asked again yesterday and they said go through a solicitor and they do not want to talk to me.

 

It states on the HMRC website that your employee must give you your P45 by law. I do not think it is fair to go through a solicitor and pay out money to get it.

 

Is there another option for me to get my P45 because the amount I earned is different from what they submitted to HMRC.

 

They said they paid me a wage that works out almost double my original wage and two payments in month.

 

No money went into my bank account.

 

This situation has made HMRC stop all our tax credits and they have instructed us to get our P45 from our employer, but they will not give it to me.

 

Any help will be appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi leeward30

 

You should only communicate with them in writing. Don't speak to them over the phone. Send a letters, Recorded Delivery.

 

You don't need a solicitor, you can take them to the Small Claims Court. Start getting all the evidence together if you are sure of about your claim. The court can order them to provide you with documents once you lodge a claim.

 

You missed an opportunity to go to an Employment Tribunal.

 

There's a letter in post 10, just remove the line regarding 'The Employment Tribunal'.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?286291-Sample-letter-to-employer-demanding-wages-Help-please!

 

Some of the guys here have legal knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean your employer rather than employee?

 

Did you not receive any payslips?

 

If not paid by BACS, how were you paid? Cash? Cheque?

 

What year are you referring to?

 

Sorry I mean employer.

 

I had two final wage slips a year ago for the same date and never received the money into my bank account. I am always paid by BACS payments.

 

I was not allowed to have contact with the company because of a court case going on. They said in writing they withheld my final salary, which a solicitor & barrister had seen.

 

Now the court case is over after a year I have tried to get my P45 because they submitted the wrong figures to tax credits and I have paid tax and NI on money I have not received.

 

ACAS said I will not get the money because it has been too long, but I need my P45 to prove to HMRC the company were wrong in figures they submitted.

 

I cannot get my P45 because they have refused to talk to me and said go through a solicitor that I cannot afford.

 

in the meantime HMRC think I earned this extra money when I have not.

 

Thanks in advance for any help1

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's clearly a backstory here we don't know the details of. One thought crosses my mind though, does ther reason your salary was withheld have an important impact on this? I don't know the answer, just asking the question.

 

An example. Suppose my gross pay is £12,000 a year, £1,000 a month. I leave and in my final month my employer says 'yes I owe you £1,000 gross but also you owe me money for "something" so I'm offsetting that against what I owe you so the net payment I'm making to you for your final month is Nil' (the "something" could be all sorts of things - for example my employer gave me a season ticket loan and recovers full outstanding amount from my final salary). What does HMRC consider is my anual earnings for the last 12 months for CTC purposes etc, £12,000 or £11,000? My guess is that they'd say £12,000. ie, as far as HMRC are concerned the fact your employer withheld all of your final salary is a separate issue, the amount witheld is part of your outgoings as far as HMRC is concerned. HMRC will treat your gross salary for the final month as part of your earnings for HMRC purposes even if in fact not a penny of it reached your bank account.

 

I'm not saying that is what's happening here, just a hypothesis that maybe an expert can comment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's clearly a backstory here we don't know the details of. One thought crosses my mind though, does ther reason your salary was withheld have an important impact on this? I don't know the answer, just asking the question.

 

An example. Suppose my gross pay is £12,000 a year, £1,000 a month. I leave and in my final month my employer says 'yes I owe you £1,000 gross but also you owe me money for "something" so I'm offsetting that against what I owe you so the net payment I'm making to you for your final month is Nil' (the "something" could be all sorts of things - for example my employer gave me a season ticket loan and recovers full outstanding amount from my final salary). What does HMRC consider is my anual earnings for the last 12 months for CTC purposes etc, £12,000 or £11,000? My guess is that they'd say £12,000. ie, as far as HMRC are concerned the fact your employer withheld all of your final salary is a separate issue, the amount witheld is part of your outgoings as far as HMRC is concerned. HMRC will treat your gross salary for the final month as part of your earnings for HMRC purposes even if in fact not a penny of it reached your bank account.

 

I'm not saying that is what's happening here, just a hypothesis that maybe an expert can comment?

 

 

I could not challenge them for holding my wages because the on-going court case that I got I cleared off after a year.

 

I now understand from what you have said they have submitted the correct amount I earned, so the P45 will not mater to HMRC.

 

What can I do about them keeping my wages after being proved I owe them nothing and I paid tax & NI on my earnings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I now understand from what you have said they have submitted the correct amount I earned, so the P45 will not mater to HMRC.

 

Just to be clear leeward30, I'm not saying that is definitely the case. I don't know enough about it. I'm just raising the possibility, hoping someone much more expert than I am can comment.

 

 

What can I do about them keeping my wages after being proved I owe them nothing and I paid tax & NI on my earnings.

 

Did you have a solicitor representing you in the original court case? Can they advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...