Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Karish v Abbey


Karish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Karish,

 

It doesnt matter if you put Without Prejudice on your claim as if their letter already had it, it extends to your reply, you are doing very well, so keep up the good work :D

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can Anyone help me. I am in the process of trying to fill out my allocation questionnaire I have read the thread about allocation questionnaires. My question is What is the difference between standard disclosure and the draft order for allocation questionnaires? Also I want to use the draft order for allocation questionnaires because it sets some shorter deadlines for response from Abbey. Where on my AQ do i put the sentence that refers them to this draft order? Sorry to sound vague but I am a bit confused about this. :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

 

Thanks in advance for your help guys.

 

Karish

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi not ignoring you will be back in a while with an answer for you. I understand about the draft order just need to know more about standard disclosure so i can explain it better. back soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi. i've had a bit of a read and as far as i can understand, you only really get standard disclosure in fast/multi tracks if your claim is allocated to small claims track then the only person who can request disclosure is the judged. Standard disclosure means that the defendant will have to supply documents with which they wish to rely on such as their charges calculations and since we know the charges are disproportionate, the banks are not going to do this.

 

The draft order is something you can pass to the judged who will then decide to take it on, it speeds up things as it asks for all parties to provide all their documents within 14days it saves on a lot of time both for the claimant and the courts. I suppose in a way, its just about what the courts can do since they can't force the banks to turn up in court!

 

does that help? would you like the link on disclosures?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I understand what I have to do now. But before I send my AQ off can I just check one more thing?

 

On the draft order there are four things that I will have to provide within fourteen days.

 

A and B are self explanatory.

 

Where do I find.

 

C. A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalities or otherwise.

 

D. Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

 

I prefer to know where this information is before I commit myself to saying that I will provide it in 14 days. Any help will be greatly appreciated:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed my allocation questionnaire yesterday. It feels good to know that I am nearer to getting my money back. I sent a copy to James Arrandale as well with a little note giving him the opportunity to settle in full. I will let you all know how I get on.

 

Byeeeee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

:( Hi everyone. I still have not heard anything about a court date yet. Also I am feeling a little fed up. When it goes quiet doubts start to set in. I am really at a point of no return but as it stands now Abbey have written to me to say that they will be reducing my overdraft by £900 on 1st June. This means that they will be putting me back in a position whereby I will be incurring charges. I have been really pleased lately as since I have opened my parachute account I have not had one single charge. Does anyone have any suggestions?

 

karish:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Karish, it's almost certainly a disconnect - the Debt Management people don't know there's a pending claim. I had similar (threat to remove overdraft if I didn't restart regular payment in). So I wrote to the Debt Management people (assume that's who wrote to you too) saying I'd restart regular payment (didn't even tell them how much, but it was about 3% of the overdraft per month) and stating claim number and mentioning the Triton Sq legal people by name, and suggesting they took into account that the balance is in dispute before taking any action on my overdraft. I copied the letter to the legal people. That was around Xmas and I never heard another dicky-bird. And the beauty of it is that you can still draw on the regular payment you make - you just need to avoid your account showing up as an unserviced "bad debt" on their computer. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. I still have not heard anything about a court date yet. Also I am feeling a little fed up. When it goes quiet doubts start to set in. I am really at a point of no return

 

Hang in there I am sure you will hear soon from the court, they are snowed under so things are taking longer.

 

Just think the longer it takes the more you get as the interest is growing daily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone. I have received a court date for 17th July. I am also pleased that the district judge has taken on board my request for a draft order for directions. Following is what my order states.

 

The claim has been allocated to the small claims track and should take no longre than 30 minutes.

 

The claimant shall within 14 days of the service of the order to the defendent nd the court.

a. a schedule of charges setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount and reasn given (if any) for that charge being made.

 

b. Copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made.

 

I am being cautious but I am sure that this means that my case should be settled within the next 28 days. I m going to prepare the information to post after the bank holiday. I really could do with a little re-assurance on a couple of things.

 

1. Is it ok to use the template statement of evidence in Gary H post and just adjust it to suit my claim with Abbey?

 

2. Is it ok to use the template witness statement in Gary H post and adjust it to suit my claim?

 

3. Is this information more or less the same as the court bundle?

 

4. With regards to the bbc commission conclusion and australian default charges report is it sufficient to put he links in my pack or do I have to print out the whole document.

 

I await a response from someone who can help. Thanks

 

Karish

c. A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalities or therwise

 

d. Copies of decided cases and other legal materials relied upon.

 

e. A witness statement.

 

 

The defendent shall within 14 days therefater file and serve a response to the claimants schedule stating in respect of each item claimed.

 

a. Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon.

 

b Whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty, and if not why not.

 

c. If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the defendents loss incurred by the claimants actions (whether or not such action is treated as a breach of contract between parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such was a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the trus cost of dealing with the matter was;

 

d. If such charge is not alleged to be pre-estimate of the defendents loss incurred by the claimants actions then fact and matters intended to be relied upon showing the basis upon which the chargs was calculated and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to show taht the charge was fair and reasonable.

 

e. Any witness statements.

 

f. Copies of decided cases and legal materials to be relied upon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have completed the collation of my documents for my court bundle. I will take them to the court tomorrow. Abbey now have fourteen days to provide a response to my schedule stating in response of each item claimed.

 

 

a. Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon.

b. Whether such charge is accepted as a penalty. If not why not.

c. If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the defendents loss incurred by the claimants actions(whether such action is treated as breach of contract between the parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such was a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was;

d. If such loss is not alleged to be a pre-estimate of the defendents loss incurred by the claimants actions then fact and matters intended to be relied upon showing the basis upon which the charge was calculated and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to show that the charge was fair and reasonable.

e. Any witess statements

f. copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

 

Some how I think that they will not want to comply:rolleyes:

 

Also I e mailed Inga to see if she wanted to settle. I await her response.

 

Bye for now folks

 

Karish

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...