Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did a hearing take place? Do you mean you just left.. Didn't give notice?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it wasnt a hearing as such, just a meeting with myself and a manager. I was offered a demotion with a 5k pay decrease plus losing commission also. They offered me a demotion or I could leave so I left immediately. Pushed rather than walked

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot withhold accrued statutory holiday under any circumstances - even for summary dismissal. Only contractual holiday over and above statutory entitlement can be forfeited.

 

However I am concerned about the timescale here - you would normally present a claim for Unlawful Deduction of Wages to an Employment Tribunal but have only three months to do so - this leaves you somewhat out of time.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not that worried about going to a tribunal, I think if I go straight to the employer they will pay what I'm owed. I was just unsure if I was due anything. Is there any way I should approach them? Eg - mentioning the possibility of a tribunal etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot withhold accrued statutory holiday under any circumstances - even for summary dismissal.

 

I was just checking if there was any possible "left us in the lurch, we had to pay agency" counter claim :)

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not that worried about going to a tribunal, I think if I go straight to the employer they will pay what I'm owed. I was just unsure if I was due anything. Is there any way I should approach them? Eg - mentioning the possibility of a tribunal etc?

 

The problem is that your time limit for bringing a claim expired around four months ago! So your employer won't pay up on the back of threatening Tribunal proceedings.

 

How much in monetary terms are you owed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are still entitled to use the small claims procedure as it is money owed under an agreement. Check your employment contract to make sure that your claim is for exactly what you are entitled to and not a penny more. The holiday year will determine this in some cases rather than accrued holiday so check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just checked my contract and it does state the holiday year run from 1st April to 31st March and that upon cessation of employment any accrued holiday should be paid.

I do believe then in this case that I should be paid 4 months worth of holiday which

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi All,

Hoping somebody can help me here on what course of action to take?

I work for a particular company where I am paid a flat basic wage and also earn commission on top giving me a good take home pay each month, providing targets are hit.

2 months ago I hit target easily and was expected to take £3k commission but less than 24 hours before payday was told the owner didnt want to pay me £3k and they were deducting £1k off my commission.

Last month, again I hit target and should have taken home £1,600 and basic but due to having 2 weeks off sick (by a doctor with a note) they took all 100% of my commission off me and a manager stated it was 10% for every sick day, and also deducted sick pay etc leaving me with just over £900. I again that month finished top of the stats and feel I should have been paid.

There is a clause in my contract which states commission is paid at the managers discretion but it seems to word it in relation to underpeformance which I clearly didnt. There is also nothing in my contract to state that if off sick you lose commission let alone the 10% for every day off.

It feels as though its been an easy way for the company not to pay me the full salary.

I also had issues with a manager yesterday who spoke to me in front of all my collagues and junior staff and said no wonder people dont like me in relation to my work etc (top of stats/good earner) and I now feel like I cannot carry on working for this company.

 

On top of these issues, I was released by them last year for misconduct and then reemployed, but when I left last year I was also due £750 for accrued holiday which also wasnt paid.

I am now wondering where I stand and what course of action to pursue.

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks :-):???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to recall last time round you also had sickness issues and wanted to claim constructive dismissal.

 

I think you need to find a line of work better suited to your personality and health.

 

There's no claim here that I can see.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we'd need to see the exact contract wording about commissions to comment.

 

How was the 3k calculated? Is there some sort of common practice or written commission policy in place?

 

And one more Q? If i put my notice in tomorrow to say leave on 5th as I have found a new job. If my employer tells me to leave, do they have to pay me considering I requested to leave on 5th Nov?

Presumably you have less than two years' continuous service, in which case your notice period is only one week.

 

Your employer could in theory give you notice immediately after you give your notice, in which case they would only have to pay you for one week. You would obviously be entitled to payment up to the 5th if you were actually working until the 5th.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no common practice mentioning any 10% per day off.

The 3k was worked out of as a percentage of payments taken etc so 40 payments = £40 and then 50 = £50. I ended on 60 so that should have been 60 x the max of £50 = £3k and was told that the owner just didnt want to pay 3k so paid 2k, dont get me wrong its good but only the top 2 took a hit and people who finished on 30 or 40 were paid the full amounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And what would the result be if I put my notice in and they then said I wasnt required to work? Would I then be entitled to the weeks pay? As letting people go seems to be quite common practice

Yes, you'd be entitled to one week's pay. Assuming you have more than one month and less than two years' continous service, they need to give you a minimum of one week's notice to terminate your employment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi All,

 

Hoping someone can help before I potentially waste my time.

 

I have done the early conciliation process to no avail and

 

 

have since submitted my claim to court via Employment Tribunal.

 

I have now been told the company are being liquidated

 

 

yet another company with the same owner is being started in the same building.

 

 

Where does the claim stand?

 

The dispute was with the old company over pay etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

numerous old threads mereged

 

 

please keep to one thread

on all related issues

for sake of history of previous advise given

and your story

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...