Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ban on smoking in cars by October 2015


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Smoking in cars carrying children is set to become illegal in England late next year in the biggest crackdown on lighting up since the ban on smoking in public places in 2007.

 

On Wednesday the government will lay the regulations in parliament needed to pave the way for the new restriction on smoking, which is likely to come into force on 1 October 2015.

 

The measure will criminalise smoking by parents, carers or other adults in a car carrying anyone under 18.

 

Enforcement officers would be able to issue a £50 fixed penalty notice both for smoking in the vehicle and failure to prevent smoking in the vehicle.

 

If the case goes to court, the maximum fine will soar to £800 for someone caught smoking in a car carrying a child and £10,000 for a driver who fails to prevent someone else smoking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not before time.

 

I hope that they ban smoking in queues next - and bus shelters

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree that you should not smoke in a car with a child in it I have a vague memory that when the law concerning wearing of seat belts came in it had to be amended from fining the driver if someone was not wearing a seat belt in the car you were driving to fining the person who should have worn the seat belt after a case concerning a chauffer who was fined when his passenger was not wearing a seat belt and would have been sacked if he had insisted on the passenger wearing one.

 

 

 

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

dpick.. Perhaps your reasoning is right. If I'm driving and someone else lights up I'd ask them to stop and if they refuse would that be an excuse for stopping on the M6 and kicking someone out? The government can't police what they have so introducing more legislation is just like trying to ice a cake you can't reach.

 

 

Will they ban, 'fat people' from KFC? Will they ban people from aisles of cleaning products that are obsessive cleaners?

 

We are being dictated to. It's not the role of government to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dpick.. Perhaps your reasoning is right. If I'm driving and someone else lights up I'd ask them to stop and if they refuse would that be an excuse for stopping on the M6 and kicking someone out? The government can't police what they have so introducing more legislation is just like trying to ice a cake you can't reach.

 

Will they ban, 'fat people' from KFC? Will they ban people from aisles of cleaning products that are obsessive cleaners?

 

We are being dictated to. It's not the role of government to do this.

 

 

Totally agree with you!

 

The Police are stretched so thin these days, that when you ring to report a crime/or in need of them, unless it's a dire emergency you have to wait hours & even days for them to come see you!(That's even if they turn up at all!)

 

Yet they are now also expected to watch out for & to fine those who smoke in a vehicle with kids in?

 

So yes while in theory it sounds good, I feel it's going to be a bit of a nightmare to police.

 

I also feel it's just another money making scheme our Government has come up with under the guise of what's best for the under 18s!!

 

George Orwell got it "oh so right" back then, when he wrote his books Animal Farm & 1984.

 

As Big Brother most defiantly is watching us esp with the amount of CCTV & Cameras everywhere & now we face being ruled by a Dictatorship!

 

Who decide what we can/can't do!

 

Where does it all end?

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, they have technology in place, the US has satellites that can read 'The Readers Digest' cover to cover from space. The government will use security cameras already installed to generate automatic fines. Infrastructure already in place. The result, millions in fines to councils.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a brilliant idea and will safeguard many children's health.

 

However it is almost impossible to enforce.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might sound silly, but if people smoke in an enclosed space with small children around that have no choice but to be there and suffer, then child abuse comes to mind.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Aside from the WHO report outlining that children of smokers were 17% less likely to contract smoking related disease in later life due to their immune systems being exposed to and becoming 'aware' of the toxins, who are the government to tell anyone what they can and can't do on private property so long as it harms no-one?

Ridiculous law from a desperate government.

So, after selling Dartford bridge/tunnel to bring cash in they are attempting to crimilise as many as possible in an effort to raise funds?

 

How much does that stink of desperation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobodies stopping others quietly killing themselves by smoking. What needs to stop is letting smokers smoke around children or non smokers and stopping the NHS dealing with smoking related illness's and diseases.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobodies stopping others quietly killing themselves by smoking. What needs to stop is letting smokers smoke around children or non smokers and stopping the NHS dealing with smoking related illness's and diseases.

 

...and as such, making them 17% MORE likely to contract smoking related diseases in later life...according to WHO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People can get overweight for a myriad of reasons. Not just by eating food. Smokers cause their own problems by inhaling many drugs, and then boast about it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a brilliant idea and will safeguard many children's health.

 

However it is almost impossible to enforce.

 

It is supposedly illegal to smoke in bus shelters and there are signs up. Doesn't stop people though.

 

How exactly is this going to be enforced?

 

 

They manage to catch a lot on the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop pussyfooting around.. make smoking anything a criminal offence.. oh, and by the way, whilst we are at it.. criminalise anyone found drinking alcohol... That will stop the run on organ kidneys, livers and hearts from alcohol abuse !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...