Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 😡🤬 Im so annoyed at talktalk i owe £20 payment ,But agen they tryed talking bfor due date & charge £7.50each time 3days bfor due they attempted ,no payment due date i put in but they tryed £26 id put 20 (iv bin told payments cant be taken bfor due date ?id already asked if they wouldt do agen),my bband was suspended Yet only ad 19 days left ,i tryed calling but left it like that i noticed emails going up to 168 i owed them Not a chance ,I got a call from debt agancy  i explained 5mins he told me they shut the line May an extra 6mths nrly ,😡 he sed he'd sort it .I herd nowt then out the blue a call from an angry lady as i didt no if a prank so i wudt give details out i felt bit uneasy as im on my own ,few days later same lady id defo say she tryed intimadating me ,Saying Ttalk ad sold the debt on im very disgusted as its not my debt (i was told write ask for all recorded calls id made iv herd nowt back) i was given a date for payment they tryed & did take bfor it charging me £19.99+ 22.50=£40+ for 1 mth ,I wozt told of a 7.50charge extra they kept breaking the days,the calls will prove everything ,Now im so mad 😡😡 selling it on i get but it did get to me as they cud of bin at my door not a call iv kept all my documents would it be worth reporting as im none the wiser if il get another call or wot ?? Thank you
    • Okay Thanks .. i will find and contact the ceo ..  I will keep updating here ..
    • When you say no correspondence, do you mean no notice to keeper from the authority and notices from TEC?   Or do you mean no notice from the bailiff?
    • So they offered 180 euros out of 768 pounds? That doesn't sound too great... but then I'm not sure if they were obliged to give you anything. Looks like people who bought year passes or "unlimited air fares" and the like have taken a heavy hit...   Does the 768 pounds include the time you spent in January, because at least then you'll have got some mileage out of it.   Otherwise you can "hope" for a 2nd lockdown which will extend your pass further since that's where we seem to be headed at the moment...
    • Ahh no worries at all  happy to help. Let us know how that went for the baggage! On a slightly more ominous note, looks like we're headed for corona hell again, but we can see how things are like Xmas time...
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Ding Ding... Round 5, MKDP/Barclaycard/Goldfish/MSDW v Spam.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1949 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

So what exactly have they supplied in response to your s78 request?

 

It would be helpful to post up with personal details removed

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They have sent pages and pages of Morgan Stanley terms and conditions which states it is a copy of the agreement, and another A4 sheet with my name and address on top and a text box about my right to cancel underneath.

 

I am not able to upload any pictures/scans from my laptop at this stage, but it is general run of the mill T&C's. Nothing outstanding.

 

I have again requested a copy of the original signed properly executed agreement Under CPR 31.14, quoting point 4 of the summary of findings Carey V HSBC, and also copies of the alleged assignment from MSDW to Barclaycard, as they have now decided that Barclaycard were not the original creditor and that MSDW was.

 

They have offered to discuss a settlement figure out of court, but I have politely told them to take a running jump.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to the above.... MKDP have stated that they don"t have a copy of the original agreement and that they don"t need it for court, and that if I want a copy of the assignment between MSDW and Barclaycard I need to ask Barclaycard for it as it has nothing to do with them.

 

Their responses seem a bit baffling to me.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are they on about?

seems like an office junior doing a court claim!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have today sent off a Part 18 request to ruffle their feathers a bit more.

 

PART 18 - REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

To: MKDP LLP (claimant)

Please answer the following questions:

1. On what date was the alleged agreement assigned from MSDW to Barclaycard?

2. What was the amount assigned?

3. Does the amount assigned include charges? If so how much?

4. Was a notice of assignment sent? If so, where to and how? ( e.g. Royal Mail first class, special delivery/ recorded delivery)

5. On what date did Barclaycard issue a card and where did they send it?

5. Does the amount claimed include charges, and if so what amount?

6. When was the alleged account terminated?

7. How was the figure on the Notice of Assignment from Barclaycard to MKDP LLP calculated?

8. How was the Notice of Assignment from Barclaycard delivered?

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE ABOVE REQUEST

WITHIN 7 DAYS OF SERVICE OF THE SAME UPON YOU

 

It may not produce much, but you've got to make them earn their keep and see if they'll hang themselves.

 

Hey to the ho. :-)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 18 is not applicable to Small Claims Track Spam.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah.. right... Cheers Andy.

 

Is there any other way I can get this information?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Subject Access Request?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have already done that with MKDP, and also Barclaycard previously thanks Andy... neither threw up any assignments etc. and I'm pretty sure that what I'm asking for doesn't exist.

 

May have to hope the DJ requests the info at the hearing In June. Should be able to cast enough doubt on their 'legal ownership' and the amount claimed in my witness statement.

 

Fingers crossed!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you challenged them on those points within your defence and put them to strict proof...then the court will insist at disclosure that the relevant paperwork is provided (originals) at disclosure stage...have you got to disclosure stage?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure to be honest!

 

I put in a holding defence online at MCOL which was as follows... (probably one of yours Andy :-D )

 

Defence

In response to the particulars of claim.

1. It is denied that there is a ‘…regulated agreement originally

between the Defendant and Barclaycard and it is denied that any

monies are due as alleged by the claimant MKDP LLP.

2. It is denied that a legal notice of assignment has been served

and the claimant is put to strict proof thereof.

3. It is further denied that any default notice has been served

by either Barclaycard or the Claimant pursuant to the Consumer

Credit Act 1974 and in accordance with the Consumer Credit

(Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983

and the claimant is put to strict proof thereof.

4. It is denied that the claimant has complied with the pre

action conduct practice direction in the following matters:-

a) Failure to send a letter before action, and

b) Failure to provide legal documentation to support their claim.

Documents have been requested under CPR 31.14 for production of

the alleged agreement, default notice and assignment.

Requests were made on 14th and 16th December 2014, but as yet

they have not been produced.

 

As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the

Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the

Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for

© show evidence of Annual Statements and Notices of Sums in

Arrears since the alleged assignment;

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under

statute or equity to issue a claim.

As the Claimant is an alleged assignee of a debt it is denied

that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to

contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and

Section 82A of the Consumer credit Act 1974.

 

I respectfully request that I may amend and particularise my

defence accordingly once the alleged legal documentation has been

received.

 

It is my intention to make a counterclaim against the claimant

MKDP LLP.

This was as an exact response to the PoC.

 

My counterclaim was :

 

MKDP LLP have been unlawfully sharing inaccurate personal details with third Parties and credit reference agencies,(Contrary to Data Protection Act 1998) causing me difficulties in obtaining credit, a regular bank account and employment.

MKDP LLP have persistently harassed me by telephone and post despite being informed that the alleged account was disputed, and them being unable to provide legal documentation proving otherwise.

Having formally complained to MKDP LLP about their harassment and unlawful use of my personal data I received a final response from them informing me that they disagreed with my comments and I could take my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Having advised them that it was my intention to do as much I was issued with a County Court claim preventing me from doing so and thereby also preventing me from resolving this dispute outside of the courts and causing me more distress.

 

Well why not? :roll:

 

 

I've done the DQ and the case has been allocated to Small Claims with witness statements and docs to be exchanged by end of next month and fees paid.

 

Original Docs are to be brought to the hearing.

 

Their reply to my defence and covering letters to the CPR 31.14 response have opened up avenues that need exploring. Particularly the bit about the alleged agreement being assigned to Barclaycard by MSDW as I have proof that it was not. I can honestly say hand on heart that I never received an assignment to Barclaycard and I was also never issued a Barclaycard so I wanted them to hang themselves.

 

:-)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you have put them to strict proof to disclose....

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the

Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for

© show evidence of Annual Statements and Notices of Sums in

Arrears since the alleged assignment;

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under

statute or equity to issue a claim.

.

 

Now take a look at your Notice of Allocation....look for additional directions apart from disclosure and witness statements.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing extra.... it"s just Day date time place of hearing, they say it should take no longer than 90 mins. Date given for delivery of docs to all parties and payment of fees. Original Docs to be brought to hearing.

That's it. No other directions. Very short and sweet.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Silly Question time....

 

If the POC states that the original Lender was Barclaycard and they are now saying that the original lender was MSDW, do they have to apply to vary the POC?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Original Docs to be brought to hearing.

 

So that should cover disclosure....as for the Particulars......well its a further point to add to their errors.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

 

Amazingly I have received a reply to my part 18 request! They are obviously as daft as I am :-)

 

They have basically answered every question with 'don't know, ask Barclaycard' apart from:

'How was the figure on the Notice of assignment calculated'

 

Where the reply was, 'The claimant submits that the balance would be the balance on the account when Barclaycard closed the account. In the event there is a discrepancy between what the Defendant believes the figure to be, this may be due to the fact that interest and charges have been applied to the account, which Barclaycard are able to do under the terms and conditions of the credit agreement.'

 

 

 

Also, they say that the defendant was 'given' notice of the assignment in compliance with s136(1) LPA 1925 rather than 'served' it so the provisions of s96 LPA 1925 for service by registered post do not apply.

 

Slippery little beggars...

 

Now I have all this 'helpful information', I'll start preparing my witness statement....

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Just tidying up my Witness statement exhibits when I noted that the signature on my copy of the alleged NOA from Barclaysharks and the signature on the copy of the NOA sent by MKDP are completely different and therefore obviously been 'invented' by them.

 

Not sure whether to admit receipt of NOA and point out the attempted fraud, or go with not having received one... either way the NOA should be flung out because there's no proof that Barclaysharks were assigned the alleged agreement from MSDW in the first place and the amount includes unlawful charges so is therefore inaccurate .....just wondering which one will be the most damning.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not state that the claimant has disclosed " documents " which contain different signatures to ones already in your possession of the same alleged documents.It is therefore brought to the courts attention that anything disclosed by the claimant can not be relied upon to be the original/legal executed version.Therefore the authenticity of any document disclosed must be questioned under oath?

 

Just a way of phrasing something without accusing anything:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That' s priceless Andy! Thank you :-D :-D

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... and there's more...

 

Have just discovered in my abundance of reconstituted agreements sent by MKDP, a covering letter from Barclaycard to MKDP.... methinks I shouldn't have seen this... :-D ... it was sent in March of this year and states... please find enclosed documentation under s78 of the CCA1974 for our mutual client as requested.

 

a) how am I a mutual client if the one and only account I am supposed to have with them has been 'assigned' in its entirety to MKDP since 2011

b) why are Barclaysharks supplying reconstituted agreements of accounts they no longer own?

 

Also on this particular copy, Barclaysharks have stated my 'current balance' as the figure stated on the County Court Claim form.... how would they have that information if they didn't still have a mucky finger in the pie?

 

The plot gets thicker!

 

My question is.... how do I raise this matter at court?

 

Can I just include this particular copy of the recon agreement in my exhibits, and raise the point as an afterthought, or must I point it out in my witness statement?

 

I ask because I have already emailed my WS to MKDP and would need to send an amendment, but I will be hand delivering the one to court tomorrow so have the opportunity to add the info.

 

Thanks Spam. :-)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the the terms of the assignment Spam.....

 

Absolute Legal or only equitable

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

 

Not sure how I would find that out..

 

NOA says 'Assigned and transferred By Barclaysharks to MKDP' and the 'effective owners of the alleged account are now MKDP'

 

Witness Statement from MKDP states, they are debt purchasers and authorised and regulated by FCA.

 

Nowhere does it say all rights and title to alleged debt belong to MKDP.

 

It all gets rather confusing...

 

If they don't own it absolute do they have the right to enforce at court... if they do own it absolute why are Barclaysharks still holding the paperwork?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'Simples.' ;)

 

Any advice I offer is probably useless but there may be little nuggets of gold in there somewhere......If I have helped in any way, be it with knowledge or by giving your chuckle muscle some exercise please feel free to tip my scales....:-D

 

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a scooby doo...welcome to the murky world of debt assignment....but it is quite normal for DCAs to request from the OC the agreement as they do not hold any paperwork from the portfolio.Some DCAs provide the response ...some OCs send the response.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...