Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3394 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Need some help here to know my rights.

 

I recently received a letter from a Ross&Roberts company saying that I had to pay council tax of £280.

 

Didn't give any other details about how the debt came about.

 

I called the council and they said it was a debt due on a former property, since 2004.

 

I asked if I could see how to set up a standing order with them, they said no; I had to talk to Ross&Roberts.

 

What bothers me is that,

after moving (2011) I did receive a council tax letter,

informing me that the account was closed and a new account was opened at the new address.

They never mentioned anything about the debt.

 

Does anyone know any rights I have about the issue?

 

They said this was a 14 days notice under which I should pay the full amount otherwise

the 'Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 will be instigated'

 

Any help will be appreciated.

 

I certainly cannot pay the full amount right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old is the liability order

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter form Ross & Roberts is for £280 and this will include the statutory Compliance Fee of £75. Accordingly, the debt passed by the council will have been £205.

 

To advise whether or not you have grounds to complain it will be necessary for you to make some enquiries with the council in the morning. You need to ask the following:

 

What was the amount of the COUNCIL TAX debt owed to the council.

 

What date was the Liability Order granted.

 

The amount of the Liability Order (including summons costs etc)

 

Whether any previous bailiff enforcement has been taken since the council obtained the Liability Order

 

The amount of any previous bailiff fees.

 

PS: I appreciate that there are quite a few questions but they are important. Please post back as soon as you have called the council. They MUST provide the information to you on request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes just to reiterate it is v important to know when the liability order was first granted

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old is the liability order

they don't last 'forever'

 

 

dx

 

I don't know. I never received any and it was not in the letter.

 

The letter form Ross & Roberts is for £280 and this will include the statutory Compliance Fee of £75. Accordingly, the debt passed by the council will have been £205.

 

To advise whether or not you have grounds to complain it will be necessary for you to make some enquiries with the council in the morning. You need to ask the following:

 

What was the amount of the COUNCIL TAX debt owed to the council.

 

What date was the Liability Order granted.

 

The amount of the Liability Order (including summons costs etc)

 

Whether any previous bailiff enforcement has been taken since the council obtained the Liability Order

 

The amount of any previous bailiff fees.

 

PS: I appreciate that there are quite a few questions but they are important. Please post back as soon as you have called the council. They MUST provide the information to you on request.

 

Yes just to reiterate it is v important to know when the liability order was first granted

 

-

Thanks for your replies.

There's actually something fishy about the whole thing.

 

Before my posting, I did contact the council, and the amount they actually said that I owed was £290,... an amount higher than the amount in the R&R letter.

 

I said the letter mentioned the lower amount of £280 and they said because your last payment was £22, that's why it's £280.

How can that be?: £290-£22=£280?

 

the lady was feeling uncomfortable talking to me and wanted to cut the conversation short.

 

As I asked if they could allow a payment plan by standing order, she refused and said that they can't take it back, I should speak to R&R.

 

if you tell me that the real amount should be in fact £205, then it all doesn't add up at all.

 

What I do remember is that many years back,

I had council tax arrears,

was unable to pay,

went to court and told them I couldn't pay,

because after the work ended,

I was on benefit.

 

I can't remember the exact year.

 

After that, some bailiff came and I told him the same thing.

They came again 2 or 3 times and left notices, as I never opened the door.

 

I never heard from them again until now.

 

How long is a liability order valid?

 

If you still live in the same area why has it taken them this long to try & sort it out? May pay to involve your local Councillor(s).

 

-

I have been asking myself the same question.

There should be a law limiting the time during which councils can pursue people about council tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now you are beginning to tell the wkole story which does alter the situation.

 

Last year the fees for bailiffs altered and now when the bailiffs write to you , a £75 charge is automatically added.

As you have already been to Court and bailffs have called on you then you should be treated under the old regulations.

So the most they can charge initially is for two visits which were probably £24 and £18.50 if those were the charges that were in force back in 2004/5 before the increase.

 

Bailiff Advice asked if you would contact the Council and ask the questions posed in that post and I would think that much of the debt would be

bailiff fees and can be challenged.

 

In light of the length of time outstanding I can understand why the Council are refusing to take staggered payments.

If therefore you are not in a position to settle the whole amount in one go after having confirmed that the bailiff fees to date are correct then you may be best talking to your local Councillor to help you deal with the Council.

 

The Law is that Council tax is payable til the ends of time.

But the Council still has to prove that you do still owe them.

There has to be some sort of paper trail which they probably have if they quoted a payment of £22 to you, unless that was a recent payment.

 

In the meantime the bailiffs will keep calling so do not let them into your property for any reason and keep cars and anything of value in the garden or shed well

away from them as they will clamp/remove them.

 

In addition you should treat this as urgent as now they have found you bailiff fees and Council actions could escalate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well go ask the council for a list of LO's then....!

 

 

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

 

 

if they got an LO within 6yrs of the 'debt' its not SB'd

 

 

if they held off 6yrs before they got the LO it can be SB'd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed the statute of limitations apply to the period between the cause of action and the issuance of the liability order i believe

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX didn't see your post

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

no bother

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is just a little update.

I have found some information about the issue in my council tax saved documents.

 

I've found the court Summons For Non-Payment issued in 2003 (Blue Paper).

It contains a fee of £30.

 

I've also found receipts of payments I made after being in court. It all brings the balance to what's included in the R&R letter.

 

Can this help to know if the debt is still enforceable?

 

I haven't contacted the council because I wanted first to look through my papers and see if I had some records.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they got a liability order within 6yrs of the CTAX debt, then sadly its still live

 

 

LO's do not expire

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just a little update.

I have found some information about the issue in my council tax saved documents.

 

I've found the court Summons For Non-Payment issued in 2003 (Blue Paper).

It contains a fee of £30.

 

I've also found receipts of payments I made after being in court. It all brings the balance to what's included in the R&R letter.

 

Can this help to know if the debt is still enforceable?

 

I haven't contacted the council because I wanted first to look through my papers and see if I had some records.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Your above response answers some of the questions that I asked in my post number 6 but it is vitally important to get answers to the other questions concerning whether any previous bailiff enforcement had been involved and most importantly.....what previous fees had been applied.

 

The matter of the previous fees is crucial as it will almost certainly be the case that this account come under the 'transitional' regulations. The local authority must provide this information to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your above response answers some of the questions that I asked in my post number 6 but it is vitally important to get answers to the other questions concerning whether any previous bailiff enforcement had been involved and most importantly.....what previous fees had been applied.

 

The matter of the previous fees is crucial as it will almost certainly be the case that this account come under the 'transitional' regulations. The local authority must provide this information to you.

-

Hi Bailiff Advice,

 

Sorry for asking this:

 

The amount requested in the R&R letter is exactly the same as the one due after discounting the payments I had made towards the bill after being in court.

So, as far as I can see, the only fee included in the requested amount is that of £30, which was already on the Summons.

 

If they did ask a LO, would they have added a fee to the balance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...