Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thanks ae - yes  I understand the claims are between me and the lender.  But with regards to the order for sale the judge specifically said it is the receiver who is appointed to sell - and he hasn't/ and isn't - which is why I am asking if I can apply to the court v the receiver for an order for sale right now?   The receiver is not part of the current proceedings heading to trial.  But he is responsible for selling the property - and he has consistently rejected offers over >5y.   This is specifically why I would like to understand if I can apply to the court to enforce the sale by the receiver??? As above - The judge has said otherwise the order for sale v the lender has to be dealt with via the trial.  Which they have deliberately delayed via the adjournment. Valuation is an issue. The lender chose the valuer.  I paid but his report basically belongs to and is referred to by the lender.  He did a prof valuation without doing a site visit.  He had done a site visit 5 months earlier for different potential lender.  The 1st valuation he erroneously did as fh.  He just did a re-write 5m later - but kept the same value for lh. I had a great offer on the table from a niche buyer which would have cleared the loan and given me a lot of £s.  But the lender rushed through the repo and the buyer got spooked and ran.  The lender then slashed the price by 30%+ from their valuation (fire sale price?).  As you suggest - they fully expected potential buyers to quickly grab the property at such a discount.  But it turned out they couldn't.  The market had dropped anyway. Then covid hit.  Every potential buyer was questioning the valuation.  The lender and receivers actions have eroded the equity.  This wouldn't make sense to any normal lender.  99.9% would have just sold to the 1st buyer willing to transact.  The lender/ receiver had such a willing buyer on day 1 of marketing.  But they spent 15months trying not to sell to them.  As I said, disclosure shows the ceo wanted (wants?) to keep it for himself - so common sense didn't (doesn't) prevail.   The lender has made a £ Claim v me.  I am disputing it because I maintain it is their actions that has caused the erosion of equity/ a debt to accrue. The lender's problem now is that they have spent so much money and added so much interest over 5y that they cannot sell the property for what they need/ want.  They are trying to blame me for this.  But it is their fault; not mine - because I am not in possession or in charge of selling it. As I also said above - if there is some legal reason why I cannot make an application to the court for an order for the receiver to sell - then can I ask the other entity which has a charging order and threatened to do so. ???    
    • We registered our child with a nursery last year for a June 2024 start date. This was before how the new 15 hours free childcare was going to work. At the time my wife paid a £50 deposit. A few weeks ago they sent out an email about how the new funding was going to work. The nurseries can use it as they wish and they said if the child wants to come for one full day we still have to pay £50 and we can't use all the hours for one day. They also drastically increased their day rate. As a result of this we were looking elsewhere and have found a much cheaper nursery so we are changing.  The original nursery now said you only get the deposit back if she starts because it comes out of the first month of fees. I don't think we filled any any form or anything so there were no terms and conditions. Are we entitled to get the deposit back or is it our fault for not asking what the terms were when we paid. 
    • Hi Baldilocks. Welcome to CAG. I've done some minor formatting edits to your post to make it easier to read for people on mobile. Try to keep to 1 or 2 sentences max before creating a line break in your post. It's the Consumer Rights Act 2015, not the Sale of Goods Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 superseded The Sale Of Goods Act 1979 and the latter does not apply as I imagine this purchase was made after 1st October 2015. Can you confirm the make and model of the vehicle? Some vehicles have their service history stored within the on board computers now or have it available to view online at any point. How did you pay for the vehicle? Finance (what type), Debit/Credit Card etc? I would argue, that should the above points not be correct, you would be right to claim that the goods are not as described under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My husband stood as guarantor for my niece for her rent - query


Fringer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I apologise if this has been covered on another thread, I have tried to scroll through to see.

 

My husband stood as guarantor for my niece for her rent on the promise she would put £100 a week into a savings account we set up for her should she ever falter on the rent.

 

She hasn't been doing this and I am trying to find out if he can be released from the contract. Does anyone have any information on this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the precise details of what your husband signed, but it seems that it is unlikely to be dependent on what your husband and neice separately agreed.

 

Most guarantor forms I have seen do not offer the guarantor any get-out.

 

On the other hand, some guarantor forms I have seen are erroneous in some way. For example, I understand a guarantor agreement should be executed as a deed which means it should say that it is a "deed" and the signatures should be witnessed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the LL another family member?

Husband is bound by terms of G contract, why should LL be doubly penalised by a G who tries to avoid his legal liabilities. I would certainly pursue such G to full extent.

A silly requirement to require neice to pay £100 / wk into savings account if she can't even afford to pay the rent! I assume niece did not sign such an Agreement with your husband, nor did LL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Landlord isn't a family member.

Niece can afford to pay the rent, her boyfriend pays it for her, he's on excellent money but didn't have anything on paper hence the need for a guarantor

 

She's trying to get the landlord to accept a few months rent in advance to let us out the contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

If T is in sole name of niece, boyfriend not a joint T, why would LL cease to require a G?

B/f could walk away at any time, or niece could kick him out.

I now see your thinking about her saving £100/wk for such eventuality, but most people spend, not save for the furure.

Is T still in fixed term, when does FT expire, how long has niece been a T?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it ppear to me that the standing as guarantor and the payment to niece are 2 entirely different things. If she is paying the rent then the guarantor will not be called upon to pay anything . As for giving niece £100pw, you can stop doing that if she is getting rent paid by b/f, it is taking the biscuit to expect money for nothing and will not be part of the tenancy agreement anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not paying her anything, she asked me to be her guarantor and in return she would put £100 a week into an account of mine just in case she falls behind with the rent, sort of a back up for reassurance for me.

My question is can i get out of the guarantor anyway? She hasn't kept up the payments to me so god forbid she doesn't pay the rent or her n the boyfriends split and he stops paying, it's me they'll come after so I need to know if I can get out now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO No. Not until end of fixed term, or LL accepts Ts early surrender on his terms.

If you did not want to risk being a G, why sign up?

Dau may act resp and not get into difficulties. If she does, will she confide in you? Better to hear it from her rather than SCC papers. A sensible LL would keep G apprised of any rent owing >1 month.

Nothing to stop you saving £100/wk for x months in lieu of dau's birthday/xmas/other gifts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my niece not my daughter. I stood guarantor on the provision she would save £100 a week with me as reassurance, it is not for me to put that money away every week to pay her rent.

She hasn't kept her side of the bargain is my point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and maybe beyond if it goes periodic?

The guarantor form ( it may help if you could post it up ) must include the same terms as the original AST, rent etc., dates, length of contract, names of parties, and usually has to be notarised, signatures verified. ( under seal ) as you have no benefit from the contract. Although some judges do not insist on this for it to be valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I stupidly agreed to stand as guarantor for a friends daughter to enable her to rent a house.

 

I received an email from the letting agent on 15th July asking me to sign the agreement they attached for the tenancy which started on 4th July.

In this agreement it stated that ID was to be taken personally into the agents office or witnessed ID was to be sent in, neither of these was requested.

I did not receive a copy of the tenancy agreement and had to email the agent to ask how long the tenancy was for.

 

I have since written to the head office of this company stating these facts and that as there are discrepancies with the agreement I am releasing myself from any such agreement.

I sent 2 letters recorded delivery in October and Nov and have heard nothing.

 

Saturday I received a letter from head office of this company stating that the tenant us in arrears with their rent and they will come after me for the money.

Do I have a leg to stand on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand this line ??

 

In this agreement it stated that ID was to be taken personally into the agents office or witnessed ID was to be sent in, neither of these was requested.

 

Are you saying it was requested but you didn't take anything in to prove who you are ?

 

Have you been on Royal Mail website to check if those letters have been signed for ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They never requested any ID at all even though it states this should happen in the contract.

The letter was signed for yes.

I have just spoken t the office I sent these letters to(this is also where the letter I have received has come from) and have been told they do not deal with anything like that there, I need to speak to the branch.

I am now trying to ring the branch but can't get any answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are saying that you didn't sign anything – then well and good. There is nothing binding you.

 

If on the other hand you are saying that you did sign an agreement – but certain technicalities surrounding the agreement and the establishment of your identity were not carried out, then I'm afraid that you probably are bound by the agreement because they are just technicalities.

 

In that case the only other thing you could say is that what you signed was not what was represented to you and that you sought that you were signing something fundamentally different. This would be a very difficult position for you to argue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement was signed yes.

 

So even if it was signed after the tenant had moved in, copies of their agreement which was supposed to be presented to me weren't, there was no length of term in the agreement I am still legally bound?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are bound by the agreement, the act of you signing and returning the documents shows that you intended to honour and be bound by the agreement. the failure to provide photo id is not a material breech so does not provide an exit from the agreement.

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providing ID is for them to comply with money laundering legislation, you can't use it I'm afraid.

 

 

All you can really do is ask them to send you a copy of the agreement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...