Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefit visit


Craftygirl65
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I had a housing benefit visit asking me questions about how I paid my rent who did I pay my rent to etc, then they asked if I was related to the letting agent which I am not , but then she asked me if I was related to the house owner which yes I am, I told her I went through the letting agent as we all wanted it to be done above board and that we way we were doing nothing wrong. I claim housing benefit because I am disabled and my husband is retired .I receive income related esa and he gets his pension. She was ask me why did I want to move into this house. Well it is a bungalow and were we lived before we could not get a bungalow and this came up at the right time, paid my month upfront as well as my deposit so I did not hide anything and I was open and honest about everything. She was being very personal asking me why I wanted to live in this bungalow which I answered I spent a very happy part of my childhood here and it made me feel safe, don't know if that sound stupid? But it does make me feel safe. I was very estranged from my parents and siblings so it just felt right to live here , I felt close to my auntie . Can you tell me have I done something wrong and will they stop my benefit until it is sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you related to the Landlord please as this will have a bearing on the advice you get

 

 

Also have a read here

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/housing_benefit_and_local_housing_allowance/what_is_housing_benefit/housing_benefit_if_renting_from_a_family_member

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're paying rent, which presumably you can prove, I don't see how you can be doing anything wrong.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The questions were probably intended to establish that the tenancy was not "contrived". A "contrived" tenancy is one that is designed solely to take advantage of the HB system - for example, relatives who would not normally charge each other rent doing so in order to claim benefits. I realise that's not what's happening in your case, but it is a fairly well-known type of fraud so they do tend to ask intrusive questions if you are related to your landlord. However, it seems you have a proper commercial tenancy through a letting agent. Is the rent you pay about what your landlord would charge someone who wasn't related?

 

Your post suggests that your aunt is your landlord. If that's the case, there's no rule that says you can't be her tenant and claim HB. You cannot claim HB if your landlord is your:

 

  • parent or step-parent, father-in-law or mother-in-law
  • child or step-child
  • daughter-in-law, son-in-law
  • sister or sister-in-law, brother or brother-in-law
  • half sisters and half brothers
  • or the partner of any of the above

If you are related to your landlord in any other way you can claim HB subject to the "contrived tenancy" rules I mentioned above.

 

 

So basically, if your aunt is your landlord and the arrangement you have is a genuine commercial one, you have done nothing wrong. They shouldn't stop your HB, I wouldn't think, but you could contact them in a few days to check that all is well if you're worried.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The above post is slightly misleading,

copied from the shelter website

You are not entitled to housing benefit if you pay rent to a close family member who shares all or part of the home with you. For example, if you make a contribution to household costs when living in your parent's home.

 

These people count as close family members:

 

parent or step-parent, father-in-law or mother-in-law

child or step-child

daughter-in-law, son-in-law

sister or sister-in-law, brother or brother-in-law

half sisters and half brothers

Partners of any of the above are also considered close family members.

 

Therefore you may rent off a close family and claim housing benefit if the family member doesnt live in the same house as you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds a bit strange "Crafty".

Do the HB rules mean that my rich uncle who owns 3 properties outright, in London, can let me live in one of his empty properties then charge me the maximum HB allowance rent, then we split the payment 50/50? Surely this can't be right? Lovely deal for us if it is though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds a bit strange "Crafty".

Do the HB rules mean that my rich uncle who owns 3 properties outright, in London, can let me live in one of his empty properties then charge me the maximum HB allowance rent, then we split the payment 50/50? Surely this can't be right? Lovely deal for us if it is though...

 

 

That isn't right as that would be fraud and contrived!

 

Your uncle would have to treat you as he would any other tenant or HB would not be paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The above post is slightly misleading,

copied from the shelter website

You are not entitled to housing benefit if you pay rent to a close family member who shares all or part of the home with you. For example, if you make a contribution to household costs when living in your parent's home.

 

These people count as close family members:

 

parent or step-parent, father-in-law or mother-in-law

child or step-child

daughter-in-law, son-in-law

sister or sister-in-law, brother or brother-in-law

half sisters and half brothers

Partners of any of the above are also considered close family members.

 

Therefore you may rent off a close family and claim housing benefit if the family member doesnt live in the same house as you.

 

Yes - I read your post and thought "I said that already!". Then I re-read my own post and realised that, actually, I didn't. Thanks for pointing that out. :wink:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, but prove it! (that's my point)

 

Anyone could commit fraud in any number of ways. They can't all be ruled out, and after all, you could pull the stunt you described with a friend who was not related. Where landlord and tenant are related there are often some extra checks to ensure the tenancy is not contrived, but sure, yes, fraud is still possible.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The test should be is it a proper tenancy? The answer to that is yes (from what you have said) so nothing to worry about. The HB people might think what they want about you but they sure as hell cant go round accusing commercial landlords of fraud though without being accountable for their words.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

Thanks everyone for your advice, my cousin owns the house and we went through a letting agency as anyone would do. They did all the usual checks and we get treated like all other tenants. No special treatment for us. We do not get full housing benefit we have to pay half of the monthly rent. We have not heard anything from housing benefit since the visit so we do not know what is going on. But we are plodding along paying the rent to the agent and we only deal with the agency,so we are in the clear as we have been honest with the benefits from the start. No news is good news as my dad used to say .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your benefit still being paid?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I moved into my flat a few years ago folloowing a period of depression. The landlord is my brother who lives elsewhere;

 

After a trial period we agreed to create a proper tenancy where I paid rent etc.

 

When claiming Housing benefit the LA did everything they could to claim contrived agreement. Even going as low as saying that the first two week trial made it so.

 

However when I lodged my appeal to the first tier tribunal they decided to review the decision again and award full entitlement. Be prepared for a fight.

 

I did highlight a case where a tenant was disabled and that the LA had said contrived agreement on the basis that the LL relative was doing extra than was expected in order to support their tenant. The judge ruled against the LA and said that this did not make it a contrived tenancy.

 

If i can dig out the case again I will let you know :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds a bit strange "Crafty".

Do the HB rules mean that my rich uncle who owns 3 properties outright, in London, can let me live in one of his empty properties then charge me the maximum HB allowance rent, then we split the payment 50/50? Surely this can't be right? Lovely deal for us if it is though...

It is not strange at all Mcall I have gone down the correct channels by going through the letting agency and paid my deposit and month upfront and kept it at that since moving in. I have been charged the same rent as anyone else who could have rented the property so no it isn't strange.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your benefit still being paid?

Hi, yes my housing benefit is still being paid not heard anything from them since the visit. So I have obviously been through this for nothing, I knew I hadn't done anything wrong but I think I needed reassurance that I had done all the right things. Thanks everyone it is appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes my housing benefit is still being paid not heard anything from them since the visit. So I have obviously been through this for nothing, I knew I hadn't done anything wrong but I think I needed reassurance that I had done all the right things. Thanks everyone it is appreciated

 

I suspect that if there was any doubt that they wouldn't be paying but you could do with confirmation. Give them a ring and check they're satisfied.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...