Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

landlord asking for another months rent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

Just looking for some advice really

Rented a property for four years

Me and the missus decided to move

We no longer had any contact details for the landlord so we contacted the estate agents through email

The said just email over a months notice that were leaving and they would forward it to the landlord

We moved out on Friday not hearing anything from the landlord

Having not heard anything from them in the four years we lived there I assumed they had retired abroad

This evening my parents receive a ****ty phone call from the landlord saying we had left the property without giving notice and that we owe them a months rent

(My parents where guarantors)

The landlord left a contact number so I text saying I had given notice with the estate agents and they said they would contact them as I no longer had contact details for them

The landlord has come back with that because I didn't give a months notice I will need to pay rent for another month until January fifth.

My response has been that I used all reasonable means to give notice and would be happy to provide all email correspondants with the estate agents.

She is insisting that I owe another month.

 

So where do I stand please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Treat it as if you never got it, or write to him and demand it in writing. Keep off the phone so you have a clear financial trail. You also want a FULL breakdown of all rent paid. Get one in writing from him, and one from the agents.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers

Should i also contact the estate agents tomorrow to make sure they forwarded my notice?

I knew the landlord would be dodgy

When I first was gonna move in she tried to demand two months deposit because I have a young son

It was only when I refused and was gonna back out that she changed her mind

 

She is also demanding that the garden needs attention and that the place is in such a state that she will be unable to rent it to anyone else

Apart from maybe a bit of weeding we left the place in pretty good shape. We gave it a good deep clean and I made sure to take dated photographs of every room when we left on Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly what date did you email LA with your NTQ?

What did it say exactly?

What day of month is rent due? (Assuming it is same date as Periodic T commenced).

Email is not the correct method for serving NTQ, written NTQ to 'address for service of Notices' in your AST, with evidence of posting, is preferable.

Having said that LL sounds a pain, though it can be a shock to find a T has left, without app giving due notice.

I wouldn't bother about LA if you have a copy of the email sent, that is a matter between LL & LA IMO

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

So what do I do in regards to the nasty phone calls to my parents saying there liable?

Monthly rent commences on the fifth of each month

I contacted the estate agent saying I had lost contact details for the landlord and he said email it to me and I will forward it to relevant person

This is my first time handing back a rented property so thought nothing more of it

So if its a matter between la and ll should I just forward relevant emails to ll?

Thank you very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly what date did you email LA with your NTQ?

What did it say exactly?

Did you receive acknowledgement of receipt from LA?

 

Please answer above Qs

 

 

Your parents (G's) can request future communication is by written letter only, but they should be informed of their on-going liability, poss without your knowledge.

LL&T law is confusing for both LLs & Ts

 

 

Certainly provide LL copies of communications between you and LA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed on the 1/11/14

I received an email confirmation from the estate agent stating they would forward it to the appropriate person.

It was a simple email giving all my details and giving the date I wished to end my time of occupation of the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who did you pay the rent to; LL or agent? did the agent manage the property on behalf of the LL? It sounds as though they did.

Are the agents on the AST as LL's agent? Did they arrange any Gas safe Certs annually for LL.

If so, it sounds as though you have taken the correct steps, IMHO.

Just forward your correspondence with LA to LL and let them sort it out between them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's your problem in a nutshell (based on the information and dates you provided in your posts):

 

1. Rent is due on 5th

2. You moved out on 5th December

3. Rent was due on 5th December

4. If you wanted tenancy to end with one month's notice, you should have moved out on Thursday 4th December.

4. LL is correct, incorrect notice given and rent is due to 4th January.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's your problem in a nutshell (based on the information and dates you provided in your posts):

 

1. Rent is due on 5th

2. You moved out on 5th December

3. Rent was due on 5th December

4. If you wanted tenancy to end with one month's notice, you should have moved out on Thursday 4th December.

4. LL is correct, incorrect notice given and rent is due to 4th January.

 

Unless the Agency agreed with the timings, and if the tenant's agreement is with the agency rather than the landlord.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's your problem in a nutshell (based on the information and dates you provided in your posts):

 

1. Rent is due on 5th

2. You moved out on 5th December

3. Rent was due on 5th December

4. If you wanted tenancy to end with one month's notice, you should have moved out on Thursday 4th December.

4. LL is correct, incorrect notice given and rent is due to 4th January.

 

I don't see where point 3. was stated by James. James said:

 

The landlord has come back with that because I didn't give a months notice I will need to pay rent for another month until January fifth.

 

which suggests rent is paid on 6th of month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know whether valid notice was given in this case.

 

If a tenant gives valid notice which is accepted, and then stays for an extra day, is a full month's rent due or just a day?

 

Various internet lore suggests that a tenant would be regarded as a trespasser and charged rent on a daily basis - possibly double the rent:

 

http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2009/11/22/tenants-notices-to-quit-holding-over-and-double-rent/

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know whether valid notice was given in this case.

 

If a tenant gives valid notice which is accepted, and then stays for an extra day, is a full month's rent due or just a day?

 

Various internet lore suggests that a tenant would be regarded as a trespasser and charged rent on a daily basis - possibly double the rent:

 

http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2009/11/22/tenants-notices-to-quit-holding-over-and-double-rent/

 

It wasn't valid if the intention was to leave on 5th December...OP said he gave notice beginning of November (1st), and if he'd left on 4th, such notice would be valid (if tenancy is periodic). He didn't leave on 4th, he left on 5th, which is the day rent is due on.

 

Legally, rent is payable in advance, and staying even one minute into the 5th (i.e. 00:01) would make the OP liable for that month's rent. Staying on does not make him a 'trespasser' - trespassing is illegal, and if a tenant who overstayed their notice and became a trespasser, they would also become a criminal on that day and be liable to arrest and eviction by the police. That clearly was not the intention of the change in law on trespassers, and if the LL wanted to get a tenant who had overstayed their notice out, the LL would have to go to court on the basis that he relied on the notice he was given and perhaps even had other tenants lined up and make a claim for any losses - so even logically it makes no sense to think that a tenant overstaying for one day could just pay one day's rent in order to do so. That would make a mockery of tenancy agreements. If a tenant only wants to stay one day extra, they should negotiate that, otherwise they leave themselves open to having to negotiate with the LL after event, which leaves them in a weaker position.

 

Incidentally, the blog you linked to was posted in 2009 - the law has changed significantly since then in relation to tenancies and trespassers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi thanks everyone

Having spoken to shelter they have told me because I didn't end the contract with the landlord I would have to pay another months rent and I should make a complaint about the estate agents.

 

The landlord is now being a nightmare again. They viewed the property today and have sent me several text messages about how disgusting the property is and they will be taking me to court.

 

They claim the flat needs a professional cleaning company to come in and clean the property. I said I was happy for the cost of that to come out of my deposit but she wants me to pay for the property to be recarpeted and decorated. Also replacement of the cooker and a new toilet cistern.

I contacted the landlord around a year ago that the handle of the toilet cistern was broke and the main oven on the cooker had stopped working. They would not do anything about them so I replaced both my self and have left the cooker in the property. The woman is sending constant threatening texts and has even started ringing my parents saying she would sue them.

When I first rented the property I thought I might need my parents as guarantor but I passed the credit check so did not need them but she still has my contact details.

I freely admitted that my son damaged one of the doors putting stickers on it and it would need a revarnish but she is insisting the door needs replacing.

 

So long story short she has got an extra month out of me. She wants to keep my complete deposit and wants even more money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading some of the previous threads that cover similar ground I have begun drafting a letter to be sent to the landlord.

I have requested information on when the property was last redecorated and when the carpet was last relayed.

The age of the cooker when we first moved in four years ago give and I have given details and dates on when the cooker and toilet cistern broke and how they ignored our calls to replace them. They are unhappy that I replaced the broken cistern with a black cistern.

I'm going back to the property tonight to revarnish the doors and to give the cooker another clean.

This was my first rental property so I made the classic mistake of not photographing when I moved in.

They are also saying I need to replace the old acrylic bath.

This woman is a total nightmare.

Any other advice would be really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like she;s pulling a fast one. WHile there are a few things that need sorting, by your own admission, she seems to want to take it a step further and have you replac everything with no cost to her, as she knows she should have sorted it, but didnt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This woman is a nightmare.

I have gone to the property. Done a final deep clean. Had the carpets shampooed and cleaned (they still look knackered) and changed the toilet cistern to a white one.

I have filmed the property when I walked out and took a meter reading and dated it with the days paper.

So anyway. I have now gone away with my family for new years. My tenancy on the property ends on Sunday. She is demanding that I be in attendance for Sunday. I have explained to her that I'm on holiday but she says she wants me there and throws in the threat of in case it goes to "court"

She has keys to property and I have put my copy of the keys into the key vault at the front door.

I'm over a hundred miles away from home at the moment and she has been sending me stupid texts all morning.

What should my response be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is always best to do a joint inspection, but as this is not possible and does not have to be done jointly, you will have to agree/disagree on the condition and come to some terms if you can.

However this is not always possible even if you are there together!

So be prepared for this to go to arbitration or court, and evidence is the key. Which it seems you have.

Any claim she may have, will have to be reasonable and take into account fair wear and tear.

she cannot claim new for old carpets say, only a percentage of the original cost, if she wants to replace them. ( carpets only last about six to eight years depending on quality ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1

 

I totally agree with Raydentinu above.

 

Could you not rearrange another date with the LL for just after you return?

 

As that way, you can verify what you did/didn't do in the property, regards cleaning etc & you will also be able to sort out your deposit money, being returned back to yourself. (minus any repairs/deductions etc that you agree upon with the LL, If any).

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...