Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to get advice about being refused a replacement camera from Brighthouse after accidental loss on holiday. The company asured me I was covered for a loss of this nature. I was told to wait 2 weeks for the new camera. After 4 weeks they told me I didn't have a crime ref' number and accidental loss was not sufficient for a new one. BEFORE I informed them of said loss I phoned a different branch and asked a hypothetical question re the nature of my own loss. They said I was in a position to make a claim.

The cover I was claiming under was already forced upon me and now it seems that theft would be ok for a replacement but not loss. They told me the opposite first time around. I told them I had slipped on a boating holiday and lost it to the river. Fine they said, wait 2 weeks. I have paid 3/4 payments so far and now they expect me to make many more payments until I have given them around 6oo pounds!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to get advice about being refused a replacement camera from Brighthouse after accidental loss on holiday.

 

 

The company asured me I was covered for a loss of this nature.

I was told to wait 2 weeks for the new camera.

 

 

After 4 weeks they told me I didn't have a crime ref' number and accidental loss was not sufficient for a new one.

 

 

BEFORE I informed them of said loss I phoned a different branch and asked a hypothetical question re the nature of my own loss.

They said I was in a position to make a claim.

 

The cover I was claiming under was already forced upon me and now it seems that theft would be ok for a replacement but not loss.

 

 

They told me the opposite first time around.

I told them I had slipped on a boating holiday and lost it to the river.

Fine they said, wait 2 weeks.

 

 

I have paid 3/4 payments so far and now they expect me to make many more payments until I have given them around 6oo pounds!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't let them mess you around,

they'll try to worm their way out of the claim,

 

 

do everything in writing (try not to call as evidence isn't kept),

 

 

I know when you call in and if they make notes this can be kept on record (you get that via an SAR).

 

But I'd pursue this as far as you are able to,

if they refuse then seek a refund of the insurance as you were mis-led into buying it

(I'm currently taking direct Court action against them for mis-sold insurance).

 

 

Ask them to see the proof of what they're claiming they need.

 

 

Make life just as hard for them.

 

Wait for Jason or one of the others to reply,

but whatever you do, keep everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim all the OSC/DLC you have ever paid

that will pay for a new camera I bet!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Afternoon grayalien,

 

Thank you for getting in touch.

 

I would advise to contact the Customer Relations team on 0800 526069 or email [email protected] and place 'CAG Ref 109556' in the subject heading. Please include your account details and the information regarding the complaint.

 

We can then investigate your complaint and come to a resolution.

 

Many Thanks

 

Jason

Web Relations

Link to post
Share on other sites

most insurance policies demand that you report the loss to the police. Almost all constabularies have a method of recording this and will issue you with a reference number that is similar to a crime ref for insurance purposes. the details needed are minimal so do that and go back to BH and give them the ref no and demand to know what they intend to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...